Abstract
Purpose : To determine if a soft insemination catheter increases pregnancy rates.
Methods : Seven hundred forty-seven consecutive intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles in 364 women in a reproductive endocrinology office between October 1998 and March 2000. Patients with even birth years were inseminated with the Tomcat catheter, and those with odd birth year with the Wallace IUI catheter. Clinical pregnancy rates were compared.
Results : The Wallace catheter group included 180 women for 372 cycles and an overall pregnancy rate of 16.4%. The Tomcat catheter group included 184 women for 375 cycles and an overall pregnancy rate of 18.1%. This difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.61). Potential confounders were accounted for.
Conclusions : When comparing the softer Wallace catheter to the less pliable Tomcat catheter during IUI cycles, there was no significant difference in pregnancy rate when using a standard gentle technique that includes not touching the top of the fundus with the catheter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Lavie O, Margolioth EJ, et al.: Ultrasonographic endometrial changes after intrauterine insemination: A comparison of two catheters. Fertil Steril 1997;68:731–734
Goudas VT, Hammitt DG, Damario MA, Session DR, Singh AP, Dumesic DA: Blood on the embryo transfer catheter is associated with decreased rates of embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy with the use of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1998;70:878–882
Wood EG, Batzer FR, Go KJ, Gutmann JN, Corson SL: Ultrasound-guided soft catheter embryo transfers will improve pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2000;15:107–112
Wolcott R, Stranger J: Potentially important variables identi-fied by transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1997;12(5):963–966
Egbase PE, al-Sharhan M, al-Othman S, al-Mutawa M, Udo EE, Grudzinskas JG: Incidence of microbial growth from the tip of the embryo transfer catheter after embryo transfer in relation to clinical pregnancy rate following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1996;11(8):1687–1689
Van Voorhis BJ, Barnett M, Sparks AET, Syropp CH, Rosenthal G, Dawson J: Effect of total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2001;75:661–668
Dickey RP, Pyrzak R, Lu PY, Taylor SN, Rye PH: Comparison of sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm. Fertil Steril 1998;71:684–689
Montanaro Gauci M, Kruger TF, Coetzee K, Smith K, Van Der Merwe JP, Lombard CJ: Stepwise regression analysis to study male and female factors impacting on pregnancy rate in an intrauterine insemination programme. Andrologia 2000;33:135–141
Goverde AJ, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JPW, Schats R, Rutten FFH, Shoemaker: Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilization in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: A randomized trial and cost effectiveness analysis. Lancet 2000;355:13–18
Hearns-Stokes RM, Miller BT, et al.: Pregnancy rates after embryo transfer depend on the provider at embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;74(1):80–86
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, K.L., Grow, D.R., Wiczyk, H.P. et al. Does Catheter Type Effect Pregnancy Rate in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles?. J Assist Reprod Genet 19, 49–52 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014414128905
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014414128905