Skip to main content
Log in

Improved Development of Very-Poor-Quality Human Preembryos by Coculture with Human Fallopian Ampullary Cells

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether a confluent culture of fallopian ampullary epithelial cells, taken from women at the end of their reproductive life, is capable of rescuing very-poor-quality preembryos from cleavage arrest and/or degeneration.

Methods: Human preembryos, rejected for transfer or freezing because of very poor quality, and arrested within 24 h of cleavage, were cultured for 5 days in medium alone or over a confluent culture of fallopian ampullary epithelial cells. Morphological criteria were utilized to assess preembryo degeneration and stage of development.

Results: The described coculture rescued preembryos from degeneration, enhancing development to the blastocyst stage 2.2-fold, compared with cultures in medium alone. Furthermore, fully expanded and hatching blastocysts were observed only under coculture conditions.

Conclusions: Very-poor-quality human preembryos may be rescued from degeneration, and their growth and development dramatically improved, when cocultured with a confluent culture of fallopian ampullary epithelial cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Quinn P: Use of co-culture with cumulus cells in insemination medium in human in vitro fertilization (IVF). J Assist Reprod Genet 1994;11:270-277

    Google Scholar 

  2. Plachot M, Antoine JM, Alvarez S, Firmin C, Pfister A, Mandelbaum J, Junca AM, Salat-Baroux J: Granulosa cells improve human embryo development in vitro. Hum Reprod 1993;8:2133-2140

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dirnfeld M, Goldman S, Gonen Y, Koifman M, Calderon I, Abramovic H: A simplified co-culture system with luteinized granulosa cells improves embryo quality and implantation rates: A controlled study. Fertil Steril 1997;67:120-122

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bongso A, Soon-Chye N, Sathananthan H, Lian NP, Rauff M, Ratnam S: Improved quality of human embryos when cocultured with human ampullary cells. HumReprod 1989;4:706-713

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jayot S, Parneix I, Verdaguer S, Discamps G, Audebert A, Emperaire JC: Co-culture of embryos on homologous endometrial cells in patients with repeated failures of implantation. Fertil Steril 1995;63:109-114

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wiemer KE, Cohen J, Amborski GF, Wright G, Wiker S, Munyakazi L, Godke RA: In vitro development and implantation of human embryos following culture on fetal bovine uterine fibroblast cells. Hum Reprod 1989;4:595-600

    Google Scholar 

  7. Menezo YJ, Guerin JF, Czyba JC: Improvement of human early embryo development in vitro by co-culture on monolayers of Vero cells. Biol Reprod 1990;42:301-306

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schillaci R, Ciriminna R, Cefalu E: Vero cell effect on in vitro human blastocyst development: Preliminary results. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1131-1135

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hu Y, Maxson W, Hoffman D, Ory S, Eager S, Dupre J, Worrilow K: Co-culture with assisted hatching of human embryos using Buffalo rat liver cells. Hum Reprod 1998;13:165-168

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van Blerkom J: Development of human embryos to the hatched blastocyst stage in the presence or absence of a monolayer of Vero cells. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1525-1539

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lai YM, Wang HS, Lee CL, Lee JD, Huang HY, Chang FH, Lee JF, Soong YK: Insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins produced byVero cells, human oviductal cells and human endometrial cells, and the role of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 in mouse embryo co-culture systems. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1281-1286

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yeung WS, Lau EY, Chan AY, Ho PC: The production of interleukin-1 alpha immunoreactivity by human oviductal cells in a co-culture system. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996;13:772-775

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fukaya T, Chida S, Murakami T, Yajima A: Is direct cell-to-cell contact needed to improve embryonic development in co-culture? Tohoku J Exp Med, 1996;180:225-232

    Google Scholar 

  14. Simón C, Gimeno MJ, Mercader A, O'Connor JE, Remohí J, Polan ML, Pellicer A: Embryonic regulation of integrins β34, and α1 in human endometrial epithelial cells in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997;82:2607-2616

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bavister BD: Co-culture for embryo development: Is it really necessary? [editorial]. Hum Reprod 1992;7:1339-1341

    Google Scholar 

  16. Watson AJ, Watson PH, Warnes D, Walker SK, Armstrong DT, Seamark RF: Preimplantation development of in vitromatured and in vitro-fertilized ovine zygotes: Comparison between co-culture on oviduct epithelial cell monolayers and culture under low oxygen atmosphere. Biol Reprod 1994;50:715-724

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wiemer KE, Garrisi J, Steuerwald N, Alikani M, Reing AM, Ferrara TA, Noyes N, Cohen J: Beneficial aspects of co-culture with assisted hatching when applied to multiple-failure in vitro fertilization patients. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2429-2433

    Google Scholar 

  18. Menezo Y, Hazout A, Dumont M, Herbaut N, Nicollet B: Co-culture of embryos on Vero cells and transfer of blastocysts in humans. Hum Reprod 1992;7(Suppl 1):101-106

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bongso, A, Fong C-Y, Ng S-C, Ratnam S: Human embryonic behavior in a sequential human oviduct-endometrial co-culture system. Fertil Steril 1994;61:976-978

    Google Scholar 

  20. Janny L, Menezo YJR: Maternal age effect on early human embryonic development and blastocyst formation. Mol Reprod Dev 1996;45:31-37

    Google Scholar 

  21. Balaban B, Urman B, Sertac A, Alatas C, Aksoy S, Nuhoglu A: Progression of excess embryos to the blastocyst stage predicts pregnancy and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998;13:2564-2567

    Google Scholar 

  22. Olivennes F, Hazout A, Lelaidier C, Freitas S, Fanchin R, de Ziegler D, Frydman R: Four indications for embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod 1994;9:2367-2373

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shoukir Y, Chardonnens D, Campana A, Bischof P, Sakkas D: The rate of development and time of transfer play different roles in influencing the viability of human blastocysts. Hum Reprod 1998;13:676-681

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wun WS, Wun CC, Valdes CT, Dunn RC, Grunert GM: Blastocyst formation is a good indicator for attainment of assisted reproduction. Chin J Physiol 1997;40:237-242

    Google Scholar 

  25. Parikh FR, Kamat SA, Nadkarni S, Arawandekar D, Parikh RM: Assisted hatching in an in vitro fertilization programme. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1996;50:121-125

    Google Scholar 

  26. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Fortini D, Aicardi G, Montanaro N: Rescue of implantation potential in embryos with poor prognosis by assisted zona hatching. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1331-1335

    Google Scholar 

  27. Le DR, Lee JE, Yoon HS, Lee HJ, Kim MK, Roh SI: The supplementation of culture medium with protease improves the hatching rate of mouse embryos. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2493-2498

    Google Scholar 

  28. Martin KL, Barlow DH, Sargent IL: Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor significantly improves human blastocyst development and hatching in serum-free medium. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1645-1652

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shalom Bar-Ami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weichselbaum, A., Paltieli, Y., Philosoph, R. et al. Improved Development of Very-Poor-Quality Human Preembryos by Coculture with Human Fallopian Ampullary Cells. J Assist Reprod Genet 19, 7–13 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014002404950

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014002404950

Navigation