Skip to main content
Log in

Cryopreservation of Embryos, Blastocysts, and Pregnancy Rates of Blastocysts Derived from Frozen-Thawed Embryos and Frozen-Thawed Blastocysts

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the development of cryopreserved embryos when thawed and subsequently cultured to the blastocyst stage in comparison to transferring cryopreserved blastocysts.

Methods: In this retrospective clinical study, we have evaluated 170 cycles in patients undergoing IVF treatment for infertility. Cryopreserved embryos were thawed and were subsequently cultured and transferred at the blastocyst stage. Cryopreserved blastocysts (Day 6) were thawed and transferred immediately.

Results: Five hundred and sixty embryos and 444 blastocysts have been thawed. In the embryos group, the survival rate was 89% while in the blastocyst group the survival rate was 56%. In the embryos group the blastocyst development rate was 24.5%. The implantation rate in the embryos group was 20.6% per group blastocyst transferred compared to 5.3% in the blastocyst group.

Conclusions: The ability of cryopreserved embryos to develop to blastocysts and their implantation potential does not seem to be greatly affected by the cryopreservation procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Gardner DK, Vella P, Lane M, Wagley L, Schlenker I, Schoolcraft WB: Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 1998;69:84-88

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mandelbaum J, Belaisch-Allart J, Junca AM, Antoine JM, Plachot M, Alvarez S, Alnot MO, Salat-Baroux J: Cryopreservation in human assisted reproduction is now routine for embryos but remains a research procedure for oocytes. Hum Reprod 1998;139:161-175

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jones GM, Trounson AO, Gardner DK, Kausche A, Lolatgis N, Wood C: Evolution of a culture protocol for successful blastocyst development and pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1998;13:169-177

    Google Scholar 

  4. Testart J, Lassalle B, Belaisch-Allart J, Hazout A, Forman R, Rainhorn JD, Frydman R: High pregnancy rate after early human embryo freezing. Fertil Steril 1986;46:268-272

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fugger EF, Bustillo M, Katz LP, Dorfmann AD, Bender SD, Schulman JD: Embryonic development and pregnancy from fresh and cryopreserved sibling pronacleate human zygotes. Fertil Steril 1998;50:273-278

    Google Scholar 

  6. Veeck LL, Amundson CH, Brothman LJ, DeScisciolo C, Maloney MK, Muasher SJ, Jones HW Jr.: Significantly enhanced pregnancy rates per cycle through cryopreservetion and thaw of pronuclear stage oocytes. Fertil Steril 1993;59:1202-1207

    Google Scholar 

  7. Demoulin A, Jouan C, Gerday C, Dubois M: Pregnancy rates after transfer of embryos obtained from different stimulation protocols and frozen at either pronucleate or multicellular stages. Hum Reprod 1991;6:799-804

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen J, De Vane GW, Elsner CW, Fehilly CB, Kort HI, Massey JB, Turner TG Jr.: Cryopreservation of zygotes and early cleaved human embryos. Fertil Steril 1998;49:283-289

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pantos K, Athanasion V, Stefanidis K, Stavrou D, Vaxevanoglou I, Chronopoulou M: The influence of advanced age on the blastocyst development rate pregnancy rate and implantation rate. Fertil Steril 1999;71:1144-1146

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harout A, Nathan-Abbon C, Chohen-Bacrie, P: Results of replacement cycles in patients with frozen cocultured supernamerary blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet 1995;12,65-68S

    Google Scholar 

  11. Menezo Y, Nicollet B, Herbaut N, Andre D: Freezing cocultured human blastocysts. Fertil Steril 1992;58:977-980

    Google Scholar 

  12. Desai NN: Blastocyst stage transfer: Pitfalls and benefits. The road to blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod 1998;13:3292-3294

    Google Scholar 

  13. Plachot M, Belasch Allart J, Mayenga JM, Chouragui A, Serkine AM, Tesquier L: Blastocyst stage transfer the real benefits compared with early embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2000: 15(Suppl. 6):24-30

    Google Scholar 

  14. Damario MA, Hammit DG, Session DR, Dumesic DA: Embryo cryopreservation at the pronuclear stage and efficient embryo use optimizes the chance for a liveborn from a single oocyte retrieval. Fertil Steril 2000;73:767-773

    Google Scholar 

  15. Behr B, Pool TB, Milk AA, Moore D, Gebbardt J, Dasing D: Preliminary clinical experience with human blastocyst development in vitro without co-colture. Hum Reprod 1999;14:454-457

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scott L, Leondires MP, Alvero RJ, Miller B: Increased clinical pregnancy rates from frozen-thawed human blastocyst using a rapid dilution and transfer protocol. Fertil Steril 2000;74:S51-S52

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marek D, Langley M, McKean C, Weing L, Doody KM, Doody KJ: Frozen embryo transfer of Day 5 blastocyst embryos compared to transfer of Day 6 blastocyst embryos. Fertil Steril 2000;74:S52-S53

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pantos, K., Stefanidis, K., Pappas, K. et al. Cryopreservation of Embryos, Blastocysts, and Pregnancy Rates of Blastocysts Derived from Frozen-Thawed Embryos and Frozen-Thawed Blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet 18, 579–582 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013138703680

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013138703680

Navigation