Skip to main content
Log in

“Co-Flare” Stimulation in the Poor Responder Patient: Predictive Value of the Flare Response

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: In this study we review our experience with a day 2 start, “Co-Flare” protocol analyzing the flare response as a predictor of outcome in patients with a history of a poor response.

Methods: This study was conducted at a university based IVF Center. A total of 564 patient cycles over a 2.5-year time frame in patients that had either elevated FSH levels or a previous poor response to conventional leuprolide acetate down-regulated stimulation were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were treated with our co-flare protocol (1.0 mg of leuprolide acetate administered on day 2 and decreased on day 5 to 0.5 mg; gonadotropins initiated on day 3). We analyzed the initial flare response and the outcome for these patients.

Results: A total of 564 patients attempted to initiate an IVF cycle. The patients mean age was 39.4 ± 3.7 years. Of the 450 cycles that started, the outcomes were as follows: 24% (108/450) cancellation, 20.4% (92/450) clinical pregnancy per initiated cycle, and a 14.0% delivery rate per initiated cycle. Patients with an estradiol flare that doubled were less likely to have cycles cancelled (13.6% vs. 35.6%, P < 0.01), but no differences were noted in pregnancy outcome if the cycle was not cancelled once the patient made it to retrieval.

Conclusions: We have demonstrated an overall 14.0% delivery rate per initiated cycle in these “poor prognosis” patients. While the initial flare response (as indicated by a doubling of the estradiol by the second day of stimulation) was indicative of a better stimulation, no difference in pregnancy outcome was seen if the patient underwent retrieval.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Cameron IT, O'Shea FC, Rolland JM, Hughes EG, de Kretser DM, Jealy DL: Occult ovarian failure: A syndrome of infertility, regular menses, and elevated follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1988;67:1190

    Google Scholar 

  2. Muasher SJ, Oehninger S, Simonetti S, Matta J, Ellis LM, Liu H-C, Jones GS, Rosenwaks Z: The value of basal and/or stimulated serum gonadotropin levels in prediction of stimulation response and in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1988;50:298-307

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scott RT Jr, Hofmann GE, Oehninger S, Muasher SJ: Intercycle variability of day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone levels and its effect on stimulation quality in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1990;54:297-302

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pellicer A, Mari M, de los Santos MJ, Simon C, Remohi J, Rarin JJ: Effects of aging on the human ovary: The secretion of immunoreactive-inhibin and progesterone. Fertil Steril 1994;61:663-668

    Google Scholar 

  5. Seifer D, Masserlian GL, Hogan JW, Gardiner AC, Blazar AS, Berk C: Day 3 serum inhibin-B is predictive of assisted reproductive technologies outcome. Fertil Steril 1997;67:110-114

    Google Scholar 

  6. Winslow KL, Toner JP, Brzyski RG, Oehninger SC, Acosta AA, Muasher SJ: The gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist stimulation test-a sensitive predictor of performance in the flare-up in vitro fertilization cycle. Fertil Steril 1991;56:711-771

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davis OK, Rosenwaks Z: In vitro fertilization. In Reproductive Endocrinology, Surgery, and Technology, E Adashi, JA Rock, Z Rosenwaks (eds), Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, 1996, pp 2319-2334

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cramer DW, Powers DR, Oskowitz SP, et al.: Gn-RH agonist used inART: The influence of lang and short regimens on pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 1999;72:83-89

    Google Scholar 

  9. Borini A, Trevesi MR, Bafaro MG, Cattoli M, Bianchi L, Flamigni C: COH in women..¸40 years undergoing IVF: Midluteal versus early follicular (flare-up) GnRH analog regimens. Acta Eur Fertil 1995;26:59-61

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spandorfer SD, Goldschlag D, Kump LM, Liu H-C, Rosenwaks Z: IVF: The adverse affect of a single failed cycle. In 46th Annual Meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, March 16-20, 1999

  11. Schoolcraft W, Schlenker T, Gee M, Stevens J, Wagley L: Improved controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in poor responder in vitro fertilization patients with a microdose follicle-stimulating hormone flare, growth hormone protocol. Fertil Steril 1997;67(1):93-97

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scott RT, Navot D: Enhancement of ovarian responsiveness with microdoses of gonadotropin-release hormone agonist during ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1994;61(5):880-885

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karande V, Morris R, Rinehart J, Miller C, Rao R, Gleicher N: Limited success using the “flare” protocol in poor responders in cycles with low basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels during in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1997;67(5):900-903

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spandorfer, S., Navarro, J., Kump, L.M. et al. “Co-Flare” Stimulation in the Poor Responder Patient: Predictive Value of the Flare Response. J Assist Reprod Genet 18, 629–633 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013121315272

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013121315272

Navigation