Skip to main content
Log in

Wavelet Compression and the Automatic Classification of Urban Environments Using High Resolution Multispectral Imagery and Laser Scanning Data

  • Published:
GeoInformatica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The field of wavelets has opened up new opportunities for the compression of satellite data. This paper examines the influence of data compression on the automatic classification of urban environments. Data from Daedalus airborne scanner imagery is used. Laser scanning altitude data is introduced as an additional channel alongside the spectral channels thus effectively integrating the local height and multispectral information sources. In order to incorporate context information, the feature base is expanded to include both spectral and non-spectral features. A maximum likelihood classification is then applied. It is demonstrated that the classification of urban scenes is considerably improved by fusing multispectral and geometric data sets. The fused imagery is then systematically compressed (channel by channel) at compression rates ranging from 5 to 100 using a wavelet-based compression algorithm. The compressed imagery is then classified using the approach described hereabove. Analysis of the results obtained indicates that a compression rate of up to 20 can conveniently be employed without adversely affecting the segmentation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Aplin, P.M. Atkinson, and P.J. Curran. “Fine spatial resolution satellite sensors for the next decade,” International Journal for Remote Sensing, Vol. 18:3873-3881, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H.-P. Bähr. “Erderkundungssatelliten und ihre Produkte,” in H.-P. Bähr and T. Vögtle (Eds.), Digitale Bildverarbeitung. 29-43. Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe, third edition, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H.-P. Bähr. “GIS introduction,” in H.-P. Bähr and T. Vögtle (Eds.), GIS for Environmental Monitoring. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L.W. Fritz. “Status of new commercial earth observation satellite systems,” Photogrammetrie. Fernerkundung. Geoinformation: 369-382, 1997.

  5. A.L. Graps. “An Introduction to Wavelets,” IEEE Computational Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 2(2):50-61, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Haala and C. Brenner. “Extraction of buildings and trees in urban environments,” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 54:130-137, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. Haala and V. Walter. “Automatic classification of urban environments for database revision using lidar and color aerial imagery,” in International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. 32, 7-4-3: W6, Valladholid, Spain, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.M. Haralick and L.G. Shapiro. Computer and Robot Vision, Volume 1, Addison-Wesley: Reading Massachusetts, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.J. Kramer. Observation of the Earth and its Environment. Survey of Missions and Sensors. Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, third edition, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Lillesand and R. Kiefer. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. U. Lohr. “Digital elevation models by laserscanning: Principle and applications,” in Third International Airborne Remote Sensing Conference and Exhibition, 174-180, 1997.

  12. LuRaTech. http://www.luratech.com. 1998.

  13. R. Nishii and S. Tanaka. “Accuracy and inaccuracy assessments in land-cover classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 37(1):491-498, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Okabe, B. Boots, and K. Sugihara. Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Application of Voronoi Diagrams. John Wiley Press: Chichester, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Sayood. Introduction to Data Compression. Morgan Kaufmann Inc.: USA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Schiewe. “Effect of lossy data compression techniques on geometry and information content of satellite imagery,” in International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, ISPRS: GIS-Between Visions and Applications. Vol. 32(4), 540-544, Commission IV, Stuttgart, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. J. Schilling and T. Vögtle. “Satellite image analysis using integrated knowledge procesing,” in International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, XVII Congress of the ISPRS, 752-757, Part B3, Commission III, 1996.

  18. J. Serra. “An introduction to mathematical morphology,” Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, Vol. 35:283-305, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. Wald. “A European proposal for terms of reference in data fusion,” in International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 32(7), 651-654, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. Walter. “Automatic classification of remote sensing data for GIS database revision,” in International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, ISPRS: GIS-Between Visions and Applications, Vol. 32(4), 641-648, Commission IV, Stuttgart, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kiema, J., Bähr, HP. Wavelet Compression and the Automatic Classification of Urban Environments Using High Resolution Multispectral Imagery and Laser Scanning Data. GeoInformatica 5, 165–179 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011442332063

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011442332063

Navigation