Skip to main content
Log in

Hypermedia Models

  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This survey deals with questions of the organization and structuring of information. Hypermedia models of three basic categories are considered: (1) models of data structures, in which information is laid; (2) models of processes, which describe the semantics of the linking and browsing; and (3) combinational models that include structural and behavioral aspects of hypermedia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Nelson, T.H., A File Structure for Complex, the Changing and the Interminate, ACM 20th National Conf., Cleveland, 1965, pp. 84–100.

  2. Nelson, T.H., Getting It Out of Our System, in Information Retrieval: A Critical Review, Schelchter, G., Ed., Washington: Tompson Books, 1967, pp. 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conklin, J., Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey, IEEE Comput., 1987, vol. 20, no. 99, pp. 17–41.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fidelio, J., A Grand Vision, BYTE, 1988, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 237-244, 268.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Epshtein, V.L., Hypertext—A New Paradigm of Programming, Avtom. Telemekh., 1991, no. 11, pp. 3–16.

  6. Franklin, C., Hypertext Defined and Applied, Online, 1989, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Epshtein, V.L., Hypertext and Hypertext Systems. Preprint of Inst. of Control Sci., Russ. Acad. Sci., Moscow, 1998, p. 39.

  8. Gruzman, V.A. and Epshtein, V.L., Elements of Knowledge Representation and Cognitive Design of Hyperdocuments, in Sb. Trudov IPU Ross. Akad. Nauk (Transactions of Inst. of Control Sci.), Moscow, 1999, pp. 60–75.

  9. Nanard, J. and Nanard, M., Using Structured Types of Incorporate Knowledge in Hypertext, Hypertext' 91, San Antonio, 1991, pp. 329–344.

  10. Campbell, B. and Goodman, J.M., HAM: A General Purpose Hypertext Abstract Machine, Commun. ACM, 1988, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 836–852.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Halasz, F., Reflections on NoteCards: Seven Issues for the Next Generation of Hypermedia Systems, Commun. ACM, 1988, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 836–852.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yankelovich, N., et al., Intermedia: The Concept and the Construction of a Seamless Information Environment, IEEE Comput., 1988, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Palaniappan, M., Yankelovich, N., and Sawtell, M., Linking Active Anchors: A Stage in the Evolution of Hypermedia, Hypermedia, 1990, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Furuta, R. and Stotts, P.D., Specifying Structured Document Transformations, Electronic Publishing, Document Manipulation and Typography, Cambridge, 1988, pp. 109–120.

  15. Halasz, F. and Schwartz, M., The Dexter Hypertext Reference Model, Hypotext Standardization Workshop, Gaithersburg, 1990, pp. 95–133.

  16. Gronbaek, K. and Randall, H.T., For a Dexter-Based Hypermedia System, Commun. ACM, 1994, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gronbaek, K. et al., Systems: A Dexter-Based Architecture, Commun. ACM, 1994, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Legget, J.J. and Schnase, J.L., Dexter with Open Eyes, Commun. ACM, 1994, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Garzotto, F., Paolini, P., and Schwabe, D., HDM—A Model for the Design of Hypertext Application, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 1993, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Knudsen, J.L. et al., Object-Oriented Software Development Environment?The Mjolner Approach, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Madsen, O.L., Moller-Pederson, B., and Nygaard, K., Object-Oriented Programming in the BETA Programming Language, Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Powers, Sh., Expectations, Netscape Enterprise Developer, 1998.

  23. Bogatyrev, P., The Cycle of a Survey, Mir PK, 1997, no. 10, pp. 122–132.

  24. Senichkin, V.I., The Functional Laguage of Conceptual Modeling of Information Systems, Preprint of Inst. of Control Sci., Russ. Acad. Sci., Moscow, 1990, p. 50.

  25. Albano, A., Cardelli, L., and Orsini, R., Galileo: A Strongly-Typed, Interactive Conceptual Language, ACM Trans. Database Syst., 1985, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 230–260.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mylopoulos, J. et al., Knowledge Representation in the Software Development Process: A Case Study, Lect. Notes Control Inf. Sci., 1986, no. 80, pp. 23–44.

  27. Nixon et al., Implementation of a Compiler for Semantic Data Model: Experience with TAXIS, SIGMOD Record, 1986, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 118–131.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ohori, A., Representing Object Identity in a Pure Functional Language, LNCS, 1990, no. 470, pp. 41–55.

  29. Senichkin, V.I., Informal Introduction to Programming of Problems of Data Processing in the Functional Language, Programmirovanie, 1993, no. 5, pp. 50–69.

  30. Buneman, P. and Nikhil, R., The Functional Data Model and Its Use for Interaction with Databases. On Conceptual Modelling, New York: Springer, 1984, pp. 359–384.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Banchilhon, F. et al., The Design and Implementation of O2, an Object-Oriented Database System, LNCS, 1988, no. 234, pp. 1–22.

  32. Lecluse, C., Richrad, P., and Valez, F.O., An Object-Oriented Data Model, SIGMOD Record, 1988, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 424–433.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Deux et al., The Story of O2, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 1990, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mannino, M.Y., The Object-Oriented Functional Data Language, IEEE Trans. Soft. Eng., 1990, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1258–1272.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gabriel, R.P., White, J.L., and Bobrow, D.G., CLOS: Interacting Object-Oriented and Functional Programming, Commun. ACM, 1991, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dannye v yazykakh programmirovaniya (Data in Programming Languages), Agafonov, V.N., Ed., Moscow: Mir, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kacmar, C.J. and Leggett, J.J., PROXHY: A Process-Oriented Extensible Hypertext Architecture, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 1991, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 399–419.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Haan, D.J., Kahn, P., Riley, V., et al., IRIS Hypermedia Services, Commun. ACM, 1992, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 36–51.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hardman Lynda, Bulterman, D.C.A., and van Rossum, G., The Amsterdam Hypermedia Model: Adding Time and Context to the Dexter Model, Commun. ACM, 1994, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 50–62.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bulterman, D.C.A., Specifying and Support of Adaptable Networked Multimedia, ACM Multimedia Syst., 1993, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fujikawa, K., Shimojo, S., Matsumura, T., and Miyahara, S., Multimedia Presentation System “Harmony” with Temporal and Active Media, Summer 1991 USENIX Conf., Nashville, 1991, pp. 75–93.

  42. Newcomb, S., Kipp, N.A., and Newcomb, V.T. “HyTime:” The Hypermedia/Time-Based Document Structuring Language, Commun. ACM, 1991, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gruzman, V.A., Senichkin, V.I. Hypermedia Models. Automation and Remote Control 62, 677–694 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010213803542

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010213803542

Keywords

Navigation