Skip to main content
Log in

Chromomycin A3 Staining as a Useful Tool for Evaluation of Male Fertility

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to investigate the associationbetween percentage chromomycin A3 (CMA3) positivity ofspermatozoa with some sperm parameters and in vitrofertilization rate.

Methods: Spermatozoa were collected from 139 men,washed in PBS, fixed in methanol/glacial acetic acid (3:1),and then spread on slides. CMA3 positivity is expressed asthe percentage in 200 spermatozoa.

Results: Percentage of CMA3 positivity showed not only anegative correlation with fertilization rate but also asignificant difference between fertilizing and nonfertilizingpatients. Moreover, percentage of CMA3-positivespermatozoa showed a negative correlation with count and percentagemotility and a positive correlation with percentage ofabnormal morphology. Percentage of CMA3 positivity also had apositive correlation with some abnormalities of head such asamorphous and macrocephaly. Ultrastructural study showedchromatin unpackaging in high CMA3-positive semensamples in comparison with low CMA3-positive semen samples.

Conclusion: There is a close relationship among fertilizationrate, sperm parameters, and CMA3 positivity and CMA3could be considered as a useful tool for evaluation of malefertility prior to infertility treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization: Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 3rd ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

  2. Mahadevan M, Trounson AO: The influence of seminal characteristics on the success rate of human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1984;42:400-405

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kruger TF, Menkueld R, Stander FSH, Lombard CJ, et al.: Sperm morphology features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1986;46:1118-1123.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu DY, Duplessis YP, Nayudu PL, et al.: The use of in vitro fertilization to evaluate putative tests of human sperm function. Fertil Steril 1988;49:272-277

    Google Scholar 

  5. Evenson DP, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed MR: Relation of mammalian sperm chromatin heterogeneity to fertility. Science 1980;240:1131-1133

    Google Scholar 

  6. Monaco PJ, Rasch EM: Differences in staining with DNA-specific fluorochromes during spermiogenesis. J Histochem Cytochem 1982;30,585

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foresta C, Zorzi M, Rossato M, et al.: Sperm nuclear instability and staining with aniline blue: Abnormal persistence of histones in spermatozoa in infertile men. Int J Androl 1992;15:330-337

    Google Scholar 

  8. Terquem A, Dadoune JP: Aniline blue staining of human spermatozoa chromatin: Evaluation of nuclear maturation. In The Sperm Cell, J Andre (ed). cell. London, Martinus Nijhoff, 1983, pp 696-701

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tejada RI, Mitchell JC, Norman A, et al.: A test for the practical evaluation of male infertility by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence. Fertil Steril 1984;42:87-91

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bianchi PG, Manicardi GC, Urner F, et al.: Chromatin packaging and mrophology in ejaculated human spermatozoa: Evidence of hidden anomalies in normal spermatozoa. Mol Hum Repord 1996;2:139-144

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ward WS, Coffey DS: DNA packaging and organization in mammalian spermatozoa: Comparison with somatic cells. Biol Reprod 1991;44:569-574

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lolis D, Georgiou I, Syrrou M, et al.: ChromomycinA3-staining as an indicator of protamine deficiency and fertilization. Int Androl 1996;19:23-27

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sakkas D, Urner F, Bianchi PG, et al.: Sperm chromatin anomalies can influence decondensation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1996;11:837-843

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shoukir Y, Chardonnens D, Compana A, et al.: Blastocyst development from supernumerary embryos after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A paternal influence? Hum Reprod 1998;13:1632-1637

    Google Scholar 

  15. World Health Organization: WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 3rd ed. Cambridge, Cambridge, University Press, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu DY, Baker HWG: Sperm nuclear chromatin normality: Relationship with sperm morphology, sperm-zona pellucida binding and fertilization rates in vitro. Fertil Steril 1992; 58:1178-1184

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sailer BL, Jost LK, Evenson DP: Mammalian sperm DNA susceptibility to in situ denaturation associated with the presence of DNA strand breaks as measured by the terminal deoxy-nucleotidyl transferase assay. J Androl 1995;16:80-87

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pousette A, Akerlof E, Rosenborg L, et al.: Increase in progressive motility and improved morphology of human spermatozoa following their migration through percoll gradient. Int J Androl 1986;9:1-13

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oehninger S, Acosta A, Morshedi M, et al.: Corrective measures and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization in patiants with severe sperm morphology abnormalities. Fertil Steril 1988;50:283-287

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iranpour, F.G., Nasr-Esfahani, M.H., Valojerdi, M.R. et al. Chromomycin A3 Staining as a Useful Tool for Evaluation of Male Fertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 17, 60–66 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009406231811

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009406231811

Navigation