Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison Between Two hCG-to-Oocyte Aspiration Intervals on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether there was any difference inthe outcome of in vitro fertilization when retrieval of oocyteswas done 34 hr (group A) or 38 hr (group B) after hCGinjection.

Methods: A total of 170 patients with tubal failure wererandomized into either group A (83 patients) or group B(87 patients). They underwent in vitro fertilization accordingto described protocols and were compared with regard tothe frequency of spontaneous ovulation, number of oocytesretrieved, oocyte cumulus complex quality, embryo quality,and implantation and pregnancy rates.

Results: There was no significant difference for any of theparameters tested for in group A and group B.

Conclusions: HCG can be administered at any time withinthe time interval of 34 to 38 hr before retrieval of oocyteswithout affecting the results of in vitro fertilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG: Laparoscopic recovery of preovulatory human oocytes after priming of ovaries with gonadotropins. Lancet 1970;1:683–689

    Google Scholar 

  2. Flemming R., Coutts JR: Induction of multiple follicular growth in normally menstruating women with endogenous gonadotropin suppression. Fertil Steril 1986;45:226–230

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Mizyen ESS, Balet R, Lower AM, Wilson C, McClure A.F, Al-Shawaf T, Grundzinskas JG: Unexpected successful fertilization in vitro of oocytes retrieved 60 hours after human chorionic gonadotrophin injection. Hum Reprod 1998;4:1020–1021

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Vits A, Gerris J, Joostens M, Aytos A: Comparison between two hCG-to-oocyte aspiration intervals (36 versus 38) on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1994;9 (Suppl 4):12–

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van den Abbeel E, Van der Elst J, Van Waesberghe L, Camus M, Devroey P, Kahn I, Smitz J, Staessen C, Wisanto A, Van Steirteghem A: Hyperstimulation: The need for cryopreservation of embryos. Hum Reprod 1988;3 (Suppl 2):53–57

    Google Scholar 

  6. Åbyholm T, Tanbo T, Dale PO: The first attempt at IVF treatment. Results and requirement for satisfactory success rate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1990;38:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tanbo T, Omland A, Dale PO: In vitro fertilization/embryo transfer in unexplained infertility and minimal peritoneal endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995;74:539–543

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edwards RG, Fishel SB, Cohen J: Factors influencing the success of in vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 1984;1:3–23

    Google Scholar 

  9. Trounson AO, Mohr LR, Wood C, Leeton JF: Effect of delayed insemination on in vitro fertilization, culture and transfer. J Reprod Fertil 1982;64:285–194

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edwards RG, Steptoe P: Indication of follicular growth, ovulation and luteinization in the human ovary. J Reprod Fertil 1975;22:121–163

    Google Scholar 

  11. McIntosh JEA, Matthews CD, Crocker JM, Broom TJ, Cox LW: Predicting the luteinizing hormone surge: Relationship between the duration of the follicular and luteal phases and the length of the human menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 1980;34:125–130

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoff JD, Quigley ME, Yen SSC: Hormonal dynamics in mid-cycle: A reevaluation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1983;57:792–796

    Google Scholar 

  13. Testart J, Frydman R: Minimum time lapse between luteinizing hormone surge or human chorionic gonadotropin administration and follicle rupture. Fertil Steril 1982;37:50–53

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hillier SG, Wickings EJ. Cellular aspects of corpus luteum function. In The Luteal Phase, SL Jeffcoate (ed). Chichester, John Wiley, 1985, pp 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  15. McNatty KP, Moore-Smith D, Makris A, Osathanondh R, Ryan KJ: The microenvironment of the human antral follicle: Interrelationships among the steroid levels in antral fluid, the population of granulosa cells, and the status of the oocyte in vivo and in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1979;49:851–860

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richards JS: Maturation of ovarian follicles: Actions and interactions of pituitary and ovarian hormones on follicular cell differentiation. Physiol Rev 1980;60:51–89

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peters H, McNatty KP: The Ovary. London, Granada Publishing, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  18. Flemming R, Coutts JRT: Induction of multiple follicular development for IVF. In Assisted Human Conception, Vol 46, RG Edwards (ed). pp 596–615

  19. Van Steirteghem AC, Liu J, Joris H: Higher success rate by ICSI than by subzonal insemination. A report of a second series of 300 consecutive treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1055–1060

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gudmundsson J, Fleming R, Jamieson ME: Luteinization oocyte retrieval delay in women in whom multiple follicular growth was induced as part of an in vitro fertilization/gamete intrafallopian transfer program. J Fertil Steril 1990;53:735–737

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bjercke, S., Tanbo, T., Dale, P.O. et al. Comparison Between Two hCG-to-Oocyte Aspiration Intervals on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet 17, 319–322 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009401027251

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009401027251

Navigation