Skip to main content
Log in

The relative bioavailability of metoprolol following oral and rectal administration to volunteers and patients

  • Published:
Pharmacy World and Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of metoprolol tartrate 25 mg fatty suppositories were studied in 5 healthy volunteers and in 8 patients suffering from instable angina pectoris. Metoprolol 25 mg capsules were used as a control oral dosage form. Metoprolol showed a considerable rectal bioavailability (AUC, C max) and was absorbed quickly from the rectum (T max). In both groups rectal bioavailability was comparable. However, oral bioavailability was much lower in the volunteer group than in the patient group. Furthermore, ratios of metoprolol/a‐OH‐metoprolol concentrations in plasma and urine gave an indication for a partial avoidance of the first pass effect after rectal administration. Further research is necessary to define an exact rectal dosage of metoprolol. In all patients, a substantial drop in heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure was seen after administration of the first suppository. Metoprolol suppositories appear to be an effective, safe and suitable alternative for patients who are in need for beta blocking medication and who are unable to take oral medication for a certain amount of time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Hoogdalem EJ, de Boer AG, Breimer DD. Pharmacokinetics of rectal drug administration, part I. Clin Pharmacokinet 1991;21;11-26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Hoogdalem EJ, de Boer AG, Breimer DD. Pharmacokinetics of rectal drug administration, part II. Clin Pharmacokinet 1991;21;110-28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Plosker GL, Glissold SP. Controlled release metoprolol formulations: a review of their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in hypertension and ischaemic heart disease. Drugs 1992;43:382-414

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McCourty JC, Silas JH, Lennard MS, Tucker GT, Woods HF. Metoprolol metabolism and debrisoquine oxidation polymorphism. Population and family studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1985;20(6):555-66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Boer AG. First pass elimination of some high clearance drugs following rectal administration to humans and rats. Ph D thesis, University of Leiden, 1979

  6. Cid E, Mella F, Lucchini L, Carcamo M, Monasterio J. Plasma concentrations and bio-availability of propranolol by oral, rectal and intravenous administration in man. Biopharm Drug Disp 1986;7:559-66

    Google Scholar 

  7. Groothuysen H, Hoogtanders K, de Stoppelaar F, Stolk L. Determination of metoprolol and alfa-hydroxymetoprolol in plasma. Ziekenhuisfarmacie 1998;14:237-8

    Google Scholar 

  8. Proost JH, Meijer DKF. MW/PHARM, an integrated software package for drug dosage regimen calculation and therapeutic drug monitoring. Comput Biol Med 1992;22:155-63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lennard MS, Silas JH, Freestone S Trevethick J. Defective metabolism of metoprolol in poor hydroxylators of debrisoquine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1982;14:301-3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lennard MS, Silas JH, Lawrence ER, Tucker GT, Woods HF. Oxidation phenotype-a major determinant of metoprolol metabolism and response. New Engl J Med 1982;307(25):1558-60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Laurent-Kenesi MA, Funck-Brentano C, Poirier JM, Decolin D, Jaillon P. Influence of CYP2D6-dependent metabolism on the steady state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metoprolol and nicardipine, alone and in combination. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1993;36:531-8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Otton SV, Crewe HK, Lennard MS, Tucker GT, Woods HF. Use of quinidine inhibition to define the role of the sparteine/ debrisoquine cytochrome P450 in metoprolol oxidation by human liver microsomes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1988;247(1):242-7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jonkers RE, Koopmans RP, Portier EJG, van Boxtel CJ. Debrisoquine phenotype and the pharmacokinetics and beta-2 receptor pharmacodynamics of metoprolol and its enantiomers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1991;256(3):959-66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Everts B, Karlson BW, Herlitz J, Abdon NJ, Hedner T. Effects and pharmacokinetics of high dose metoprolol on chest pain in patients with suspected or definite acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1997;53:23-31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Regardh CG, Jordö L, Ervik M, Lundborg P, Olsson R, Rönn O. Pharmacokinetics of metoprolol in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Clin Pharmacokin 1981;6:375-88

    Google Scholar 

  16. Regardh CG, Landahl S, Larsson M, Lundborg P, Steen B, Hoffmann KJ, Lagerström PO. Pharmacokinetics of metoprolol and its metabolite α-OH-metoprolol in healthy, nonsmoking, elderly individuals. Eur J Clin Parmacol 1983;24:221-6

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sanberg A, Abrahamsson B, Regardh CG, Wieselgren I, Bergstrand R. Pharmacokinetic and biopharmaceutic aspects of once daily treatment with metoprolol CR/ZOK: A review article. J Clin Pharmacol 1990;30:S2-S16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Stoppelaar, F., Stolk, L., Beysens, A. et al. The relative bioavailability of metoprolol following oral and rectal administration to volunteers and patients. Pharm World Sci 21, 233–238 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008792421982

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008792421982

Navigation