Skip to main content
Log in

Validating a core collection of Peruvian quinoa germplasm

  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Peruvian quinoa core collection, containing 103 chosen ecotypes or landraces, was defined on a geographically stratified non-overlapping sampling procedure. The objective was to determine whether this protocol was correct. Hence, a phenotypic distance matrix among 76 accessions from this core collection was created by calculating the difference between each pair of accessions for each characteristic. These 76 accessions were chosen because they had complete data for eight morphological descriptors. The diversity index was calculated by averaging all the differences in the phenotypic value for each quantitative descriptor divided by the respective range, and considering a matching coefficient for the qualitative descriptors, i.e., 0 for characteristics that matched, and 1 if they did not. The total sum of squares from the analyses of variance for the phenotypic diversity index, based on morphological descriptors, was partitioned between and within Peruvian Departments. The between Department cluster variance was smaller (0.0022) than the within Department cluster variance (0.0144), because accessions with the same stem colour or similar inflorescence type and colour were grouped together irrespective of their Department. This was further corroborated by the average linkage cluster analysis, which was performed on the phenotypic diversity matrix to study the pattern of variation and the relationship between the quinoa landraces of this core subset according to their geographical origin. Within each sub-cluster (based on above qualitative descriptors) accessions were ranked by their Department of collection, which indicated that the sampling method was appropriate for choosing accessions for the Peruvian quinoa core collection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous, 1990. SAS procedure guide, version 6, 3rd ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.H.D., 1989. Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31: 818–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwinkel, A. & O. Stølen, 1997. Understanding the quinoa crop: guidelines for growing in temperate regions of N.W. Europe. European Commission (DG VI F.II.3 – Coordination of Agricultural Research), Brussels, 23 pp.

  • Hill, J., H.C. Becker & P.M.A. Tigerstedt, 1998. Quantitative and Ecological Aspects of Plant Breeding. Chapman &Hall, London, 275 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin, T., A.H.D. Brown, Th. J. L. van Hintum & E.A.V. Morales (Eds), 1995. Core collections of plant genetic resources. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 269 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, S.E., 1997. Adaptation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) to Northern European agriculture: studies on developmental pattern. Euphytica 96: 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, S. E. & O. Stølen, 1993. Quinoa –Morphology, phenology and prospects for its production as a new crop in Europe. Eur. J. Agron. 2: 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, S.E., I. Jørgensen & O. Stølen, 1994. Cultivation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) under temperate climatic conditions in Denmark. J. Agric. Sci. (Cambridge) 122: 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, M.A., P.W. Skroch, J. Nienhuis, P. Hinrichsen, G. Bascur & C. Muñoz-Schick, 1997. Gene pool classification of common bean landraces from Chile based on RAPD and morphological data. Crop Sci. 37: 605–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastebroek, H.D. & L.J.M. van Soest, 1994. Gierstmelde blijkt multi-purpose-gewas. Prophyta 1: 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mujica, A., M. Rodriguez, S. Pino, V. Apaza & F. Huapaya, 1991. Catálogo de cultivos andinos: quinua (Chenopodium quinoaWilld.). Universidad Nacional del Altiplano Puno, PerÚ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, R., 1997. Peruvian in situconservation of Andean crops. In: N. Maxted, B.V. Ford-Lloyd & J.G. Hawkes (Eds), Plant genetic conservation: the in situapproach. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 302–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, R., E.N. Ruiz-Tapia & A. Mujica-Sánchez, 1998. Sampling strategy for a core collection of Peruvian quinoa germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 475–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, R. & O. Stølen (Eds), 1997. Spelt and quinoa. Crop Development for the Cool and Wet Regions of Europe. European Commission, Brussels, 129 pp.

  • Ruiz-Tapia, E.N., O. Stølen, J.L. Christiansen & R. Ortiz, 1997. Assessment of quinoa accessions (Chenopodium quinoaWilldenow) for tolerance to salinity. In Ortiz, R. & O. Stølen (Eds), Spelt and quinoa. Crop Development for the Cool and Wet Regions of Europe. European Commission, Brussels, pp. 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stølen, O., K. Bruhn, K. Pitham & J. Hill (Eds), 1997. Small grains cereals and pseudocereals. Crop Development for the Cool and Wet Regions of Europe. European Commission, European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research, Brussels, 183 pp.

  • Wright, S., 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Ann. Eugen. 15: 323–324.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodomiro Ortiz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ortiz, R., Madsen, S., Ruiz-Tapia, E.N. et al. Validating a core collection of Peruvian quinoa germplasm. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46, 285–290 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008636232584

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008636232584

Navigation