Skip to main content
Log in

Current controversies in the application of meta-analysis (with special reference to oncological treatments)

  • Published:
Pharmacy World and Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Emperical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effect in controlled clinical trials. JAMA 1995;273:408-12.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Delamothe T. Whose data are they anyway? Raw data from research on patients should be available, anonymised, to whoever wants them. BMJ 1996;213:1241-2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleijnen, J. Current controversies in the application of meta-analysis (with special reference to oncological treatments). Pharm World Sci 19, 117–118 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008634223999

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008634223999

Keywords

Navigation