Skip to main content
Log in

Reasoning about Information Change

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we introduce Dynamic Epistemic Logic, which is alogic for reasoning about information change in a multi-agent system. Theinformation structures we use are based on non-well-founded sets, and canbe conceived as bisimulation classes of Kripke models. On these structures,we define a notion of information change that is inspired by UpdateSemantics (Veltman, 1996). We give a sound and complete axiomatization ofthe resulting logic, and we discuss applications to the puzzle of the dirtychildren, and to knowledge programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aczel, P., 1988, Non-Well-Founded Sets, CSLI Lecture Notes, Stanford.

  • Barwise, J., 1981, "Scenes and other situations," Journal of Philosophy 78(1), 369–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Emde Boas, P., Groenendijk, J., and Stokhof, M., 1980, "The conway paradox: Its solution in an epistemic framework," pp. 159–182 in Proceedings of the Third Amsterdam Montague Symposion.

  • Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y., and Vardi, M., 1995, Reasoning about Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., and Vardi, M.Y., 1991, "A model theoretic analysis of knowledge," Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 39(2), 382–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P., 1988, Knowledge in Flux, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, R., 1987, Logics of Time and Computation, CSLI Lecture Notes.

  • Groeneveld, W., 1995, "Logical investigations into dynamic semantics," Ph.D. Thesis, ILLC Dissertation Series 1995-18, University of Amsterdam.

  • Jaspars, J., 1994, "Calculi for constructive communication. A study of the dynamics of partial states," Ph.D. Thesis, ITK, Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.

  • Katsuno, H. and Mendelzon, A.O., 1992, "On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it", pp. 183–203 in Belief Revision, P. Gärdenfors, ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., 1990, "Formalization of two puzzles involving knowledge," pp. 1–61 in Formalizing Common Sense: Papers by John McCarthy, V. Lifschitz, ed., Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, Y., Dolev, D., and Halpern, J.Y., 1986, "Cheating husbands and other stories: A case study of knowledge, action, and communication," Distributed Computing 1, 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, V.R., 1976, "Semantical considerations on floyd-hoare logic," pp. 109–121 in Proceedings of 17th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

  • de Rijke, M., 1993, "A system of dynamic modal logic," in Extending Modal Logic, Ph.D. Thesis, ILLC Dissertation Series 1993-4, University of Amsterdam.

  • Segerberg, K., 1995, "Belief revision from the point of view of doxastic logic," Bulletin of the IGPL 3(4), 535–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoham, Y., 1993, "Agent oriented programming," Artificial Intelligence 60(1), 51–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veltman, F., 1996, "Defaults in update semantics," Journal of Philosophical Logic 25, 221–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerbrandy, J., Groeneveld, W. Reasoning about Information Change. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6, 147–169 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008222603071

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008222603071

Navigation