Advertisement

Cytotechnology

, Volume 34, Issue 1–2, pp 111–119 | Cite as

Comparison of cell growth in T-flasks, in micro hollow fiber bioreactors, and in an industrial scale hollow fiber bioreactor system

  • Michael J. Gramer
  • Douglas M. Poeschl
Article

Abstract

In this article, cell growth in a novel micro hollow fiberbioreactor was compared to that in a T-flask and theAcuSyst-Maximizer®, a large scale industrial hollowfiber bioreactor system. In T-flasks, there was relativelylittle difference in the growth rates of one murine hybridomacultured in three different media and for three other murinehybridomas cultured in one medium. However, substantialdifferences were seen in the growth rates of cells in themicro bioreactor under these same conditions. These differencecorrelated well with the corresponding rates of initial cellexpansion in the Maximizer. Quantitative prediction of thesteady-state antibody production rate in the Maximizer was moreproblematic. However, conditions which lead to faster initialcell growth and higher viable cell densities in the microbioreactor correlated with better performance of a cell line inthe Maximizer. These results demonstrate that the microbioreactor is more useful than a T-flask for determining optimalconditions for cell growth in a large scale hollow fiberbioreactor system.

cell culture hollow fiber bioreactor hybridoma micro bioreactor optimization T-flask 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ala-Uotila S, Marjamaki A, Matikainen M-T and Jalkanen M (1994) Use of a hollow fiber bioreactor for large scale production of α2-adrenoceptors in mammalian cells. J Biotechnol 37: 179–184.Google Scholar
  2. Banik GG and Heath CA (1996) High density hybridoma perfusion culture: Limitation vs. inhibition. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 61: 211–229.Google Scholar
  3. Brotherton JD and Chau PC (1996) Modeling of axial flow hollow fiber cell culture bioreactors. Biotechnol Prog 12: 575–590.Google Scholar
  4. Chuppa S, Tsai Y-S, Yoon S, Shakelford S, Rozales C, Bhat R, Tsay G, Matanguihan C, Konstantinov K and Naveh D (1997) Fermentor temperature as a tool for control of high density perfusion cultures of mammalian cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 55: 328–338.Google Scholar
  5. Gramer MJ, Poeschl DM, Conroy MJ and Hammer BE (1999) Effect of harvesting protocol on performance of a hollow fiber bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 65: 334–340.Google Scholar
  6. Gramer MJ and Poeschl DM (1998) Screening tool for hollow fiber bioreactor process development. Biotechnol Prog 14: 203–209.Google Scholar
  7. Hirschel MD and Gruenberg ML (1988) An automated hollow fiber system for the large scale manufacture of mammalian cell secreted product. In: BK Lydersen (ed) Large Scale Cell Culture Technology. Macmillan, pp. 113–144.Google Scholar
  8. Kidwell WR (1989) Filtering out inhibition. Bio/Technology 7: 462–463.Google Scholar
  9. Knazek RA, Wu Y-W, Aebersold PM and Rosenberg SA (1990) Culture of human tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in hollow fiber bioreactors. J Immunol Methods 127: 29–37.Google Scholar
  10. Liu JJ, Chen B-S, Tsai T-F, Wu Y-J, Pang VF, Hseih A, Hsieh JH and Chang TH (1991) Long term and large scale cultivation of human hepatoma Hep G2 cells in hollow fiber bioreactor. Cytotechnology 5: 129–139.Google Scholar
  11. Ozturk SS and Palsson BO (1991) Growth, metabolic, and antibody production kinetics of hybridoma cell culture. Biotechnol Prog 7: 481–494.Google Scholar
  12. Ozturk SS, Riley MR and Palsson BO (1992) Effects of ammonia and lactate on hybridoma growth, metabolism, and antibody production. Biotechnol Bioeng 39: 418–431.Google Scholar
  13. Palsson BO, Paek S-H, Schwartz RM, Palsson M, Lee G-M, Silver S and Emerson SG (1993) Expansion of human bone marrow progenitor cells in a high density continuous perfusion system. Bio/Technology 11: 368–371.Google Scholar
  14. Patkar AY, Koska J, Taylor DG, Bowen BD and Piret JM(1995) Protein transport in ultrafiltration hollow fiber bioreactors. AIChE J 41: 415–425.Google Scholar
  15. Piret JM and Cooney CL (1991) Model of oxygen transport limitations in hollow fiber bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 37: 80–92.Google Scholar
  16. Ratner PL, Cleary ML and James E (1978) Production of rapid harvest Moloney murine leukemia virus by continuous cell culture on synthetic capillaries. J Virol 26: 536–539.Google Scholar
  17. Richards SM, Garman RD, Keyes L, Kavanagh B and McPherson JM (1998) Prolactin is an antagonist of TGF-β activity and promotes proliferation of murine B cell hybridomas. Cell Immunol 184: 85–91.Google Scholar
  18. Schlapfer BS, Scheibler M, Holtorf A-P, Nguyen HV and Pluschke G (1995) Development of optimized transfectoma cell lines for production of chimeric antibodies in hollow fiber cell culture systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 45: 310–319.Google Scholar
  19. Stronek DF, Hubel A, Shankar RA, Burger SR, Pan D, McCullough J and Whitley CB (1999) Retroviral transduction and expansion of peripheral blood lymphocytes for the treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis type II, Hunter's syndrome. Transfusion 39: 343–350.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Gramer
    • 1
  • Douglas M. Poeschl
    • 1
  1. 1.Cellex Biosciences, Inc.Coon RapidsU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations