Skip to main content
Log in

Phase II Trial of Pyrazoloacridine as Second-Line Therapy for Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma

  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: A phase II trial of pyrazoloacridine(PZA) was conducted to assess its activity andtoxicity in patients with advanced transitional cellcarcinoma (TCC) refractory to or progressing after oneprior cisplatin-, carboplatin- or paclitaxel- basedregimen.

Patients and methods: PZA at a dose of750 mg/m2 was administered to 14 patients as athree-hour intravenous infusion on day 1 every 21days. Premedication consisted of lorazepam 0.5-1.0 mgprior to each cycle to alleviate central nervoussystem toxicity. Reduction of subsequent doses wasmade for hematologic or central nervous systemtoxicity.

Results: Among fourteen patients evaluable forresponse, no responses were observed (0% responserate; 95% confidence interval 0% to 23%). Themedian duration of survival for all patients was 9months with a median follow-up of 8.5 months. Toxicityto PZA included grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 8/14(57%) and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia in 2/14(14%). Non-hematologic toxicity was mild.

Conclusions: PZA at this dose and schedule does nothave significant single-agent acitvity in patientswith TCC who have failed one prior regimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harker WG, Meyers FJ, Freiha FS, et al: Cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine (CMV): an effective chemotherapy regimen for metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract. A Northern California Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 3: 1463–1470, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scher HI, Norton L: Chemotherapy for urothelial tract malignancies: breaking the deadlock. Semin Surg Oncol 8: 316–341, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sternberg CN, Yagoda A, Scher HI, et al: Methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin for advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Cancer 64: 2448–2458, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  4. Loehrer PJ, Sr, Einhorn LH, Elson PJ, et al: A randomized comparison of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study. J Clin Oncol 10: 1066–1073, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  5. Logothetis CJ, Dexeus FH, Finn L, et al: A prospective randomized trial comparing MVAC and CISCA chemotherapy for patients with metastatic urothelial tumors. J Clin Oncol 8: 1050–1055, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saxman SB, Propert KJ, Einhorn LH, et al: Long-term followup of a phase III intergroup study of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study. J Clin Oncol 15: 2564–2569, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  7. LoRusso P, Foster BJ, Poplin E, et al: Phase I clinical trial of pyrazoloacridine NSC366140 (PD115934). Clin Cancer Res 1: 1487–1493, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rowinsky EK, Noe DA, Grochow LB, et al: Phase I and pharmacologic studies of pyrazoloacridine, a novel DNA intercalating agent, on single-dosing and multiple-dosing schedules. J Clin Oncol 13: 1975–1984, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gardner MJ, Altman DG: Estimating with confidence. Brit Med J 296: 1210–1211, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. JASA 53: 457, 1958

  11. Bajorin DF, Dodd PM, McCaffrey JA, et al: M-VAC in transitional cell carcinoma (TCC): prognostic factors and long-term survival in 203 patients (pts). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 17: 311a, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roth BJ, Dreicer R, Einhorn LH, et al: Significant activity of paclitaxel in advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelium: a phase II trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 12: 2264–2270, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  13. Witte RS, Elson P, Bono B, et al: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group phase II trial of ifosfamide in the treatment of previously treated advanced urothelial carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 15: 589–593, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moore MJ, Tannock IF, Ernst DS, et al: Gemcitabine: A Promising New Agent in the treatment of Advanced Urothelial Cancer. J Clin Oncol 15: 3441–3445, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stadler WM, Kuzel T, Roth B, et al: Phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol 15: 3394–3398, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vaughn DJ, Malkowicz SB, Zoltick B, et al: Paclitaxel plus carboplatin in advanced carcinoma of the urothelium: an active and tolerable outpatient regimen. J Clin Oncol 16: 255–260, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  17. Redman B, Hussain M, Smith D, et al: Phase II evaluation of paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced urothelial cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 16: 325a, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dreicer R, Roth B, Lipsitz S, et al: E2895 cisplatin and paclitaxel in advanced carcinoma of the urothelium: a phase II trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncol Group (ECOG). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 17: 320a, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bajorin DF, McCaffrey JA, Hilton S, et al: Treatment of patients with transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract with ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin: a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 16: 2722–2727, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  20. McCaffrey JA, Dodd PM, Hilton S, et al: Ifosfamide + paclitaxel + cisplatin (ITP) chemotherapy for patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 18, 1999

  21. Norton L, Simon R: The Norton-Simon hypothesis revisited. Cancer Treat Rep 70: 163–169, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  22. Norton L: Conceptual basis for advances in the systemic drug therapy of breast cancer. Semin Oncol 24: S11–2-S11–12, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  23. Skipper HE: Analyses of multiarmed trials in which animals bearing different burdens of L1210 leukemia cells were treated with two, three, and four-drug combinations delivered in different ways with varying dose intensities of each drug and varyng average dose intensities. Southern Res Inst Booklet 7: 87–92, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aisner J, Weinberg V, Perloff M, et al: Chemotherapy versus chemoimmunotherapy (CAF v CAFVP v CMF each +/-MER) for metastatic carcinoma of the breast: a CALGB study. Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Clin Oncol 5: 1523–1533, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  25. Buzzoni R, Bonadonna G, Vallagussa P, et al: Adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus cycolphosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in the treatment of resectable breast cancer with mort than three positive axillary nodes. J Clin Oncol 9: 2134–2140, 1991

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dodd, P.M., McCaffrey, J.A., Mazumdar, M. et al. Phase II Trial of Pyrazoloacridine as Second-Line Therapy for Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 18, 247–251 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006477823378

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006477823378

Navigation