Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of presence of abnormal wall motion on echocardiographic determination of left ventricular function with automated boundary detection technique: re-evaluation

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is still unclear whether echocardiography with an automated boundary detection technique (ABD) can accurately determine the left ventricular (LV) volume and function particularly in the presence of LV wall asynergy. We intended to re-evaluate the reliability and application of the ABD, which was based on the acoustic quantification technique (Sonos 2500, Hewlett Packard) for the LV volume measurement in patients without or with LV wall asynergy. A total of 80 patients (mean age 56 years) who underwent left ventriculography (LVG) were divided into two groups. The group A consisted of 29 patients with normal LV wall motion and the group B consisted of 51 patients with generalized or regional LV wall motion abnormality. In group A patients, the LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) was 96 ± 25 ml by ABD and 112 ± 33 ml by LVG and those of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) were 44 ± 14 ml by ABD and 48 ± 17 ml by LVG, thus resulting in the underestimation of LV volume by 12% in average. Under these conditions, the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) by ABD, 54 ± 8%, correlated well with that by LVG, 58 ± 7%. Although underestimation of LV volume by 17% in average also occurred in groups B (N.S.), LVEF was found to correlate well with that by LVG; 27 ± 8% vs 30 ± 11% (r=0.87, SEE=3.1%) for 21 patients with the generalized LV asynergy; 39 ± 10% vs 39 ± 12% (r=0.86. SEE=3.3%) for 30 patients with the regional LV asynergy. These results demonstrate the feasibility of the ABD in determining the LVEF, although underestimation can occur in measuring the absolute LV volume in patients with or without LV asynergy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perez JE, Waggoner AD, Barzilai B, Melton HE, Miller JG, Sobel BE. On-line assessment of ventricular function by automatic boundary detection and ultrasonic backscatter imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 313-320.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Perez JE, Klein SC, Prater DM, Fraser CE, Cardona H, Waggoner AD. Automated, on-line quantification of left ventricular dimensions and function by echocardiography with backscatter imaging and lateral gain compensation. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70: 1200-1205.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yvorchuk KJ, Davies RA, Chan KL. Measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by acoustic quantification and comparison with radionuclide angiography. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74: 1052-1056.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gorcsan J, Gasior TA, Mandarino WA, Deneault LG, Hattler BG, Pinsky MR. On-line estimation of changes in left ventricular stroke volume by transesophageal echocardiographic automated border detection in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72: 721-727.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tardif JC, Cao QL, Pandian NG, Esakof DD, Pollard H. Determination of cardiac output using acoustic quantification in critically ill patients. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74: 810-813.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Katz WE, GAsior TA, Reddy SC, Gorcsan J 3rd. Utility and limitations of biplane transesophageal echocardiographic automated border detection for estimation of left ventricular stroke volume and cardiac output. Am Heart J 1994; 128: 389-396.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Morrissey RL, Siu SC, Guerrero JL, Newell JB, Weyman AE, Picard MH. Automated assessment of ventricular volume and function by echocardiography: validation of automated border detection. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1994; 7: 107-115.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lindower PD, Rath L, Preslar J, Burns TL, Rezai K, Vandenberg BF. Quantification of left ventricular function with an automated border detection system and comparison with radionuclide ventriculography. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 195- 199.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clarkson BM, Wheeldon NM, Lim PO, Pringle SD, MacDonald TM. Left atrial size and function: assessment using echocardiographic automatic boundary detection. Br Heart J 1995; 74: 664-670.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vandenberg BF, Rath LS, Stuhlmuller P, Melton HE, Skorton DJ. Estimation of left ventricular cavity area with an online, semiautomated echocardiographic edge detection system. Circulation 1992; 86: 159-166.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Foley DA, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with a new automated echocardiographic border detection system: Comparison with Doppler (abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 261A.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marcus R, Marcus RH, Bednarz J, Coulden R, Lipton M, Lang RM. Ultrafast CT evaluation of automated endocardial border detection system for assessment of LV function. Circulation 1992; 86: Suppl-263.

  13. Perez JE, Waggoner AD, Barzilai B, Davila-Roman VG, Cardona H, Prater DM et al. Lateral gain compensation: a new method to improve two dimensional echocardiographic imaging and facilitate on-line edge detection and quantification of ventricular function (abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 262A.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cao QL, Azevedo J, Snapper H, Schwartz S, Udelson J, Pandian N. Automated on-line determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by acoustic quantification: (1) in vitro validation, (2) in vivo comparison with radionuclide method in patients, (3) examination of factors Influencing its accuracy, and (4) clinical application (abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 275A.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mor-Avi V, Gillesberg IE, Korcarz C, Sandelski J, Lang RM. Improved quantification of left ventricular function by applying signal averaging to echocardiographic acoustic quantification. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1995; 8: 679-689.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chandra S, Bahl VK, Reddy S. CB, Bhargava B, Malhotra A, Wasir HS. Comparison of echocardiographic acoustic quantification system and radionuclide ventriculography for estimating left ventricular ejection fraction: Validation in patients without regional wall motion abnormalities. Am Heart J 1997; 133: 359-363.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marcus RH, Bednarz J, Coulden R, Shroff S, Lipton M, Lang RM. Ultrasonic backscatter system for automated online endocardial boundary detection: evaluation by ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 839-847.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tomimoto S, Nakatani S, Uematsu M, Beppu S, Nagata S, Hamada S et al. Feasibility of the left ventricular volume measurement by acoustic quantification method: comparison with ultrafast computed tomography. J Cardiol 1995; 25: 37-42.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang L, Morrissey R, Handschumacher MD, Vazquez de Prada JA, He J, Picard MH et al. Quantitative three-dimensional reconstruction of left ventricular volume with complete borders detected by acoustic quantification underestimates volume. Am Heart J 1996; 131: 553-559.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chandra S, Garcia MJ, Morehead A, Thomas JD. Two-dimensional Fourier filtration of acoustic quantification echocardiographic images: improved reproducibility and accuracy of automated measurements of left ventricular performance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997; 10: 310-319.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vered Z, Barzilai B, Mohr GA, Thomas LJ, Genton R, Sobel BE et al. Quantitative ultrasonic tissue characterization with real-time integrated backscatter imaging in normal human subjects and in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1987; 76: 1067-1073.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Van Reet RE, Quinones MA, Poliner LR, Nelson JG, Waggoner AD, Kanon D et al. Comparison of 2-dimensional echocardiography with gated radionuclide ventriculography in the evaluation of global and regional ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 3: 243-252.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jennesseaux C, Metz D, Maillier B, Nazeyrollas P, Maes D, Tassan et al. Estimation of left ventricular volumes and ejection with acoustic quantification in myocardial infarction. Comparison with echocardiographic, angiographic and scintigraphic data. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1996; 89: 843-849.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Teicholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, Gorlin R. Problems in echocardio-graphic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlation in the presence or absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol 1976; 37: 7-11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, G., Nakamura, K., Tsukada, T. et al. Impact of presence of abnormal wall motion on echocardiographic determination of left ventricular function with automated boundary detection technique: re-evaluation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 14, 253–259 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006060105703

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006060105703

Navigation