Abstract
The objective of the consistent-amplitude approach to quantum theory has been to justify the mathematical formalism on the basis of three main assumptions: the first defines the subject matter, the second introduces amplitudes as the tools for quantitative reasoning, and the third is an interpretative rule that provides the link to the prediction of experimental outcomes. In this work we introduce a natural and compelling fourth assumption: if there is no reason to prefer one region of the configuration space over another, then they should be “weighted” equally. This is the last ingredient necessary to introduce a unique inner product in the linear space of wave functions. Thus, a form of the principle of insufficient reason is implicit in the Hilbert inner product. Armed with the inner product we obtain two results. First, we elaborate on an earlier proof of the Born probability rule. The implicit appeal to insufficient reason shows that quantum probabilities are not more objective than classical probabilities. Previously we had argued that the consistent manipulation of amplitudes leads to a linear time evolution; our second result is that time evolution must also be unitary. The argument is straightforward and hinges on the conservation of entropy. The only subtlety consists of defining the correct entropy; it is the array entropy, not von Neumann's. After unitary evolution has been established we proceed to introduce the useful notion of observables and we explore how von Neumann's entropy can be linked to Shannon's information theory. Finally, we discuss how various connections among the postulates of quantum theory are made explicit within this approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
C. E. Shannon, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379, 623 (1948), reprinted in C. E. Shannon and W. Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1949).
E. T. Jaynes, Papers on Probability, Statistics and Statistical Physics, R. D. Rosenkrantz, ed. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983).
S. Kullback, Information Theory and Statistics (Wiley, New York, 1959). J. Shore and R. Johnson, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory IT-26, 26 (1980). J. Skilling, in Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods in Science and Engineering, G. J. Erickson and C. R. Smith, eds. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1988).
J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1955).
See, e.g., D. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 631 (1983). M. H. Partovi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1883 (1983). R. Balian, Eur. J. Phys. 10, 208 (1989). W. H. Zurek, ed., Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990).
R. Blankenbecler and M. H. Partovi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 373 (1985).
A. Caticha, Phys. Lett. A 244, 13 (1998) (quant-ph/9803086).
A. Caticha, Phys. Rev. A 57, 1572 (1998) (quant-ph/9804012).
P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1958).
R. P. Feynman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 20, 267 (1948). R. P. Feynman and A. R. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals (McGraw- Hill, New York, 1965).
H. Stapp, Am. J. Phys. 40, 1098 (1972). M. Jammer, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974), and references therein.
The fact that Born's postulate is actually a theorem has been independently discovered several times: A. M. Gleason, J. Math. Mech. 6, 885 (1957); D. Finkelstein, Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 25, 621 (1963); J. B. Hartle, Am. J. Phys. 36, 704 (1968); N. Graham, in The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, B. S. DeWitt and N. Graham, eds. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1973). The limit N → ∞, where N is the number of replicas of the system is further discussed in Refs. 23 and 28.
T. F. Jordan, Am. J. Phys. 59, 606 (1991), with comments by N. Gisin, Am. J. Phys. 61, 86 (1993).
R. T. Cox, Am. J. Phys. 14, 1 (1946).
E. P. Wigner, Group Theory (Academic, New York, 1959). G. Emch and C. Piron, J. Math. Phys. 4, 469 (1963).
W. Daniel, Helv. Phys. Acta 55, 330 (1982). N. Gisin, J. Math. Phys. 24, 1779 (1983).
E. T. Jaynes, Phys. Rev. 108, 171 (1957), reprinted in Ref. 2.
A. Caticha, The assumptions underlying the consistent-amplitude approach to quantum theory (quant-ph/9809066).
Y. Tikochinsky, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 27, 543 (1988); J. Math. Phys. 29, 398 (1988).
See, for example, L. de Broglie, Non-Linear Wave Mechanics—A Causal Interpretation (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1950); P. Pearle, Phys. Rev. D 13, 857 (1976); I. Bialynicki-Birula and J. Mycielski, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 100, 62 (1976); S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 485 (1989); S. Weinberg, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 194, 336 (1989); N. Gisin, Helv. Phys. Acta 62, 363 (1989).
C. G. Shull, D. K. Atwood, J. Arthur, and M. A. Horne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 765 (1980). R. Gahler, A. G. Klein, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. A 23, 1611 (1981). J. J. Bollinger et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1031 (1989).
E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutman, Ann. Phys. 192, 368 (1989).
E. T. Jaynes, in Statistical Physics, K. W. Ford, ed. (Benjamin, New York, 1963), Vol. 3, p. 182; IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern. SSC-4, 227 (1968); both reprinted in Ref. 2; J. E. Shore and R. W. Johnson [3]; J. Skilling [3].
For a similar view, see A. Peres, Am. J. Phys. 52, 644 (1984).
L. P. Hughston, R. Jozsa, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Lett. A 183, 14 (1993).
See, e.g., D. Finkelstein, J. M. Jauch, S. Schiminovich, and D. Speiser, J. Math. Phys. 3, 207 (1962). S. L. Adler, Commun. Math. Phys. 104, 611 (1986). D. Hestenes, Space-time Algebra (Gordon 6 Breach, New York, 1966); D. Hestenes, New Foundations for Classical Mechanics (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986). W. E. Baylis, ed., Clifford (Geometric) Algebras (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1996).
C. C. Rodríguez, in Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods, W. von der Linden, V. Dose, R. Fischer, and R. Preuss, eds. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999) (quant-ph/9808010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caticha, A. Insufficient Reason and Entropy in Quantum Theory. Foundations of Physics 30, 227–251 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003692916756
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003692916756