Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 493–518 | Cite as

Embedding Coordinates for the Well-Dressed Quark

  • John P. Ralston
Article

Abstract

Traditional lore holds that there is only one way to represent local symmetry, leading to practically unique gauge theories. However there is more than one path to local symmetry. Here I discuss expressing the theory of dressed quarks, gluons and other particles using new variables. The gauge sector is expressed with fields eaμ which transform homogeneously like matter fields under the gauge group. Consistency requires further embedding in a larger global group. Many interesting topics of gauge theories, from the elementary nature of the Coulomb field to magnetic monopoles, serve as illustrations. Geometrical invariants forbidden in the standard coordinates become available in the new approach. I argue that these are natural, and useful, in the description of an effective theory. For example, in a covariant derivative expansion, one can express a massively propagating gauge invariant effective theory in four space-time dimensions.

Keywords

Gauge Theory Gauge Group Interesting Topic Gauge Sector Local Symmetry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    James MacCullagh, “An Essay Towards a Dynamical Theory of Crystalline Reflexion,” Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 1, 374(18361840); also published in Philosophical Magazine, Ser. 3, 16 (1840). See also the Collected Works of James MacCullagh, John Jewett and Samuel Haughton, eds. (Trinity College, Dublin, 1881).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    William Thomson (Lord Kelvin), Baltimore Lectures (1884).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. A. M. Dirac, The Physical Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 3rd edn. (Cambridge University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Lavelle and D. McMullan, Physics Reports 279, 1 (1997) and references therein. E. Bagan, M. Lavelle, and D. McMullan, Phys. Rev. D 57, 4521 (1998); Mod. Phys. Lett. A 12, 1815 (1997); Erratum-ibid. A 12, 2317 (1997).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Belloni, L.-S. Chen, and K. Haller, Phys. Lett. B 403, 316 (1997); Phys. Lett. B 373, 185 (1996). K. Haller and L.-S. Chen, in 29th International Conference on High-Energy Physics (ICHEP 98)(Vancouver, Canada, 1998), to be published, hep-th-9808044; see also hep-th/9803250.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. P. Ralston, preprint (1997, 1999); R. Buniy and J. P. Ralston, in preparation.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. E. Haagensen, K. Johnson, and C. S. Lam, Nucl. Phys. B 477, 273 (1996). K. Johnson, in Quantum Infrared Physics (Paris, 1996), H. Fried and B. Muller, eds. (World Scientific, 1997).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    See elementary texts on Differential Geometry. Especially good is the book by D. Stoker, Differential Geometry (Wiley, 1965). See also Differential Geometry by H. W. Guggenheimer (McGraw-Hill, 1963).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Frenkel,The Geometry of Physics (Wiley, 1997).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B 190, 455 (1971). J. Arafune, P. G. O. Freund, and C. Goebel, J. Math. Phys 16, 433 (1975).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Ralston
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of KansasLawrence

Personalised recommendations