Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of the number of RAPD markers on the evaluation of genotypic distances in Vitis vinifera

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of the number of RAPD fragments on the estimation of genetic distances has been studied on 10 genotypes (Vitis vinifera) using 320 primers. A total number of 1683 scorable bands was obtained but only polymorphic bands (932) were considered in this work. The variation of the genetic distances, in relation to an increasing number of bands, was evaluated through a bootstrap sampling procedure. The mean coefficient of variation (CV) of the genetic distances decreased as the number of bands increased. A CV of 10% was obtained with about 100–150 bands while a CV of 5% with a large number of bands (400–500 and over). To reduce the cost and the time of the analyses, primers with different levels of polymorphism were compared. Genetic distance matrices, based on different numbers of bands and primer polymorphism, were highly correlated with the genetic distance matrix of the whole data set when they were determined with a large number of RAPD fragments, either from high or low polymorphic primers. The effect of the number of bands on the estimation of genetic distances was evaluated also through the variation of the pattern of aggregation among genotypes (cluster analysis). Stable clusterings were detected when a large number of polymorphic bands (400 and over) was used. Some rearrangements of the genotypes in the dendrograms was observed as the number of bands decreased; below 100–150 bands the clusterings were completely rearranged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Botta, R., N.S. Scott, I. Eynard & M.R. Thomas, 1995. Evaluation of microsatellite sequence-tagged site markers for characterizing Vitis vinifera cultivars. Vitis 34(2): 99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourquin, J.C., A. Sonko, L. Otten & B. Walter, 1993. Restriction fragment length polymorphism and molecular taxonomy in Vitis vinifera L. Theor Appl Genet 87: 431–438.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J.E., E.B. Bandman & C.P. Meredith, 1993. DNA fingerprint characterization of some wine grape cultivars. Amer J Enol Viticult 44: 266–274.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J.E., G.S. Dangl, R. Vignani & C.P. Meredith, 1996. Isolation and characterization of new polymorphic simple sequence repeat loci in grape (Vitis vinifera). Genome 39: 628–633.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buscher, N., E. Zyprian, O. Bachmann, & R. Blaich, 1994. On the origin of the grapevine variety Muller-Thurgau as investigated by the inheritance of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Vitis 33: 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipriani, G., G. Frazza, E. Peterlunger & R. Testolin, 1994. Grapevine fingerprinting using microsatellite repeats. Vitis 33: 211–215.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. & R. Tibshirani, 1991. Statistical analysis with computer age. Science 253: 390–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogorcena, Y., S. Arulsekar, A.M. Dandekar & D.E. Parfitt, 1993. Molecular markers for grape characterization. Vitis 32: 183–185.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grando, S.M., L. De Micheli, L. Biasetto & A. Scienza, 1995. RAPD markers in wild and cultivated Vitis vinifera. Vitis 34: 37–39.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, B. & C.P. Meredith, 1995. Comparison of Vitis berlandieri × Vitis riparia rootstock cultivars by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Vitis 34: 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean-Jaques, I., A. Defontaine & J.N. Hallet, 1993. Characterization of Vitis vinifera cultivars by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA markers. Vitis 32: 189–190.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, M.C., M. Strefeler, N.F. Weeden & B.I. Reisch, 1992. Genetic analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphisms in Vitis. J Hered 83: 18–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, S., Y. Gogorcena & J.M. Ortiz, 1995. The use of RAPD markers for identification of cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Sci Hort 62: 237–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, D.L., M. Cresti, H.P. Liskens, L. Intrieri, O. Silvestroni, R. Vignani & M. Pancaldi, 1995. DNA fingerprinting of italian grape varieties: a test of reliability in RAPDs. Adv Hort Sci 9: 185–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nienhuis, J., J. Tivang, P. Skroch & J.B. dos Santos, 1995. Genetic relationship among cultivars and landraces of lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L) as measured by RAPD markers. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 120(2): 300–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resta, P, G. Fanizza & B. Zhuang, 1995. Polymorphisms among grape cultivars (V. vinifera L.) revealed by replicated RAPD profiles. In: Shejbal J. (Ed), Atti del Convegno Biotecnologie avanzate e agricoltura, pp. 320–329.

  • Rohlf, F.J., 1992. NTSYS-pc-Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Exeter Software, Setauket, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skroch, P.W. & J. Nienhuis, 1995. Impact of scoring error and reproducibility of RAPD data on RAPD based estimates of genetic distance. Theor Appl Genet 91: 1086–1091.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.J., J.S. Scott-Craig, J.R. Leadbetter, G.L. Busch, D.L. Roberts & D.W. Fulbright, 1994. Characterization of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) products from Xanthonomas campestris and some comments on the use of RAPD products in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Phylo Evol 3: 135–145.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P.H.A. & R.R. Sokal, 1973. Numerical taxonomy. WH Freeman and Company. San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Striem, M.J., P. Spiegel-Roy, E. Ben-Hayyim, J. Beckmann & D. Gidoni, 1990. Genomic DNA fingerprinting of Vitis vinifera by the use of multiloci probes. Vitis 29: 223–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M.S. & N.S. Scott, 1993. Microsatellite repeats in grapevine reveal DNA polymorphisms when analysed as sequence tagged sites (STSs). Theor Appl Genet 86: 985–990.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M.S., P. Cain & N.S. Scott, 1994. DNA typing of grapevines: a universal methodology and database for describing cultivars and evaluating genetic relatedness. Plant Mol Biol 25: 937–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thormann, C.E., M.E. Ferriera, L.E.A. Camargo, J.G. Tivang & T.C. Osborne, 1994. Comparison of RFLP and RAPD genetic relationships within and among cruciferous species. Theor Appl Genet 88: 973–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tivang, J.G., J. Nienhuis & O.S. Smith, 1994. Estimation of sampling variance of molecular marker data sites using the bootstrap procedure. Theor Appl Genet 89: 259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeden, N.F., G.M. Timmerman, M. Hemmat, B.E. Kneen & M.A. Lodhi, 1992. Inheritance and reliability of RAPD markers pp. 12–17. In: Applications of RAPD technology to plant breeding. Crop Sci Soc Amer, Madison Wis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xianping, Q., J. Lu & O Lamikanra, 1996. Genetic diversity in Muscadine and American bunch grapes based on random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 121: 1020–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, H. & A.T. Bakalinsky, 1996. Identification of grape (Vitis) rootstocks using sequence characterized amplified region DNA markers. HortScience 3(2): 267–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, N., G. Ono, K. Takashima & A. Totsuka, 1991. Restriction fragment length polymorphism of grapewine DNA with the phenylalamine ammonia-lyase cDNA. Japan J Breed 41: 365–368.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fanizza, G., Colonna, G., Resta, P. et al. The effect of the number of RAPD markers on the evaluation of genotypic distances in Vitis vinifera. Euphytica 107, 45–50 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003535916622

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003535916622

Navigation