Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 83–89 | Cite as

Efficiency of different systems for medication distribution in an academic children's hospital in the Netherlands

  • Marten J. Poley
  • Clazien A.M. Bouwmans
  • Lidwien M. Hanff
  • Peter J. Roos
  • B. Martin van Ineveld


Background: In the Sophia Children's Hospital, both a ward stock system and a decentralized, patient-orientated, ready-to-use drug distribution system (a ‘satellite pharmacy system’) exist. Hospital management considered expanding the concept of the satellite pharmacies. Little was known, however, about the efficiency of this drug distribution system, whereas there is increasing pressure to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of pharmacy services.

Objective: To analyze the efficiency of satellite pharmacies compared with other medication distribution systems.

Methods: All medication orders and prepared doses were counted. The workload of the two current distribution systems was calculated using the direct time study method. Furthermore, the consequences of altering the distribution system were calculated by formulating nine variants in which certain activities surrounding the medication distribution were moved between nurses and pharmacy technicians. Moreover, we varied the degree of computerization of the medication order registration.

Results: The required working hours are the largest in the variants in which nurses do the preparation of the drugs. Moving the distribution of some drug categories, such as ready-to-use drugs, prepared oral drugs, and prepared inhalation drugs, from pharmacy technicians to nurses appeared not to produce noticeable benefits compared with the current distribution system. Expanding the concept of the satellite pharmacies involves a small rise in total working hours compared with the current situation, but does not raise personnel costs. The largest cost savings can be achieved by introducing an on-line computerized physician order-entry system.

Conclusions: The concept of satellite pharmacies offers an efficient distribution system for the Sophia Children's Hospital.

Costs and cost analysis Drug distribution processes Efficiency Hospital pharmacy Patient-orientated pharmacy Pharmacy organization Satellite pharmacy The Netherlands Workload 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    George B, Silcock J. Economic evaluation of pharmacy services-fact or fiction? Pharm World Sci 1999; 21: 147-51.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walley T, Haycox A. Pharmacoeconomics: basic concepts and terminology. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 43: 343-8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poley MJ, Bouwmans CAM, van Ineveld BM. Revision of the medication distribution in the Sophia Children's Hospital (Academic Hospital Rotterdam). Rotterdam: Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, 2000. Report No.: 00.54 [in Dutch].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rascati KL, Kimberlin CL, McCormick WC. Work measurement in pharmacy research. Am J Hosp Pharm 1986; 43: 2445-52.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caamaño F, Ruano A, Figueiras A, Gestal-Otero JJ. Data collection methods for analyzing the quality of the dispensing in pharmacies. Pharm World Sci 2002; 24: 217-23.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Opoien D. Establishment of surgery satellite pharmacy services in a large community hospital. Hosp Pharm 1984; 19: 485-90.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sateren LA, Streit RJ. Decentralization of pharmaceutical services in a large hospital complex. Am J Hosp Pharm 1986; 43: 2785-9.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sittig DF, Stead WW. Computer-based physician order entry: the state of the art. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 108-23.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roberts AW. Effect on drug costs of implementing decentralized drug distribution. Am J Hosp Pharm 1983; 40: 604-6.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hawkins VA, Powell MF. Justification for a pediatric satellite pharmacy at a tertiary-care institution. Am J Hosp Pharm 1992; 49: 2192-7.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miyagawa CI, Rivera JO. Effect of pharmacist interventions on drug therapy costs in a surgical intensive-care unit. Am J Hosp Pharm 1986; 43: 3008-13.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Torchinsky A, Landry D. An analysis of pharmacist interventions. Can J Hosp Pharm 1991; 44: 245-8.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Allan EL, Barker KN. Fundamentals of medication error research. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990; 47: 555-71.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Teich JM et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA 1998; 280: 1311-6.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Payne TH. Computer decision support systems. Chest 2000; 118: 47S-52S.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee F, Teich JM, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Implementation of physician order entry: user satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996; 3: 42-55.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schiff GD, Rucker TD. Computerized prescribing: building the electronic infrastructure for better medication usage. JAMA 1998; 279: 1024-9.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bates DW, Cohen M, Leape LL, Overhage JM, Shabot MM, Sheridan T. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 8: 299-308.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marten J. Poley
    • 1
  • Clazien A.M. Bouwmans
    • 1
  • Lidwien M. Hanff
    • 2
  • Peter J. Roos
    • 2
  • B. Martin van Ineveld
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA)Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.The Hospital PharmacySophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations