Advertisement

Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 201–213 | Cite as

Soil organic carbon stocks in soil aggregates under different land use systems in Nepal

  • B.M. Shrestha
  • B.K. Sitaula
  • B.R. Singh
  • R.M. Bajracharya
Article

Abstract

We investigated the soil organic carbon (SOC) associated with various aggregate size fractions in soil profiles under different land uses. Bulk soil samples were collected from incremental soil depths (0–10, 10–20, 20–40, 40–60, 60–80 and 80–100 cm) from sites with the four dominant land use types [forest, grazing land, irrigated rice in level terraces (Khet) and upland maize-millet in sloping terraces (Bari)] of the Mardi watershed (area 144 km2), Nepal. The bulk soil was separated into five aggregate size fractions and the associated SOC contents were determined. Soil physical parameters necessary for estimating the soil SOC stock such as bulk density, stone and gravel content, and SOC content, were also measured for each soil depth. The SOC stock (mean ± SE, kg C m–2) in the topsoil (0–10 cm) was higher in grazing land soil (3.4 ± 0.1) compared to forest soil (1.4 ± 0.2) and cultivated soil [Bari (2.0 ± 0.2) and Khet (1.2 ± 0.2)]. Forest and grazing lands had similar SOC contents, but the higher content of gravel and stone in forest soil resulted in a lower estimate of the SOC stock per unit area. The total SOC stock in the soil profile (to 1 m depth) over the entire watershed was estimated to be 721470 TC (tonnes of carbon). Its distribution was 52, 30, 11 and 7% in forestland, Bari, grazing land and Khet, respectively. The estimated depth wise distribution of SOC stock for 1 m soil depth in the entire watershed was 28, 22, 28 and 22% in the 0–10, 10–20, 20–40, and > 40 cm soil depths, respectively. There was a net loss of SOC stock (0–40 cm soil depth) of 29%, due to internal trading of land uses in the period from 1978 to 1996. Macro aggregates (> 1 mm) were found to be the dominant size in Bari and grazing land, whereas in forest and Khet soil micro aggregates (< 1 mm) dominated. Micro aggregates of size < 0.25 mm had a higher SOC concentration than aggregates of 0.25–0.5 mm, regardless of the depth or land uses and they may therefore contribute to soil C sequestration.

Land use Mid-hill watershed Nepal Soil aggregates Soil organic carbon SOC stock 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson J.M. and Ingram J.S.I. (eds) 1993. Total organic carbon in soil: colorimetric method. In: Tropical Soil Biology and fertility: A Handbook of Methods, 2nd edition. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 62–64.Google Scholar
  2. Andrén O., Kätterer T. and Hyvönen R. 2001. Projecting soil fauna influence on long-term soil carbon balances from faunal exclusion experiments. Appl. Soil Ecol. 18: 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Awasthi K.D., Sitaula B.K., Singh B.R. and Bajracharya R.M. 2002. Land use changes and morphometric analysis using GIS for two mountain watersheds of western Nepal. Land Degrad. Develop. 13: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bajracharya R.M. 2001. Land preparation: an integral part of farming system in the mid-hills of Nepal. Nepal J. Sci. Technol. 3: 15–24.Google Scholar
  5. Bajracharya R.M., Lal R. and Kimble J.M. 1998a. Long-term tillage effect on soil organic carbon distribution in aggregates and primary particle fractions of two Ohio soils. In: Lal R., Kimble J.M., Follett R.F. and Stewart B.A. (eds), Management of Carbon Sequestration in Soil. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp. 113–123.Google Scholar
  6. Bajracharya R.M., Lal R. and Kimble J.M. 1998b. Soil organic carbon distribution in aggregates and primary particle fractions as influenced by erosion phases and landscape position. In: Lal R., Kimble J.M., Follett R.F. and Stewart B.A. (eds), Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp. 353–367.Google Scholar
  7. Blake G.R. and Harte K.H. 1986. Bulk density. In: Methods of Soil Analysis part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods-Agronomy Monograph (2 nd edition). American Society of Agronomy–Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 425–442.Google Scholar
  8. Burton S., Shah P.B. and Schreier H. 1989. Soil degradation from converting forest land into agriculture in the Chitawan district of Nepal. Mount Res. Develop. 9: 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Wit H.A. and Kvindesland S. 1999. Carbon stock in Norwegian forest soils and effects of forest management on carbon storage. Report fra skogforskingen-suppelement 14: 1–52.Google Scholar
  10. Fernandes E.C.M., Motavalli P.P., Castilla C. and Mukurumbira L. 1997. Management control of soil organic matter dynamics in tropical land-use systems. Geoderma 79: 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Franzluebber A.J., Haney R.L., Honeycutt C.W., Arshad M.A., Schomberg H.H. and Hons F.M. 2001. Climatic influence on active fractions of soil organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33: 1103–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glaser B., Turrion M.B., Solomon D., Ni A. and Zech W. 2000. Soil organic matter quantity and quality in mountain soils of the Alay Range, Kyrgyzia, affected by land use change. Biol. Fertil. Soils 31: 407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gurung N.R. 2000. Forest degradation/regeneration in the hills of Nepal, a study at watershed level. M.Sc. Thesis. Noragric, Agricultural University of Norway, Ås, Norway.Google Scholar
  14. Hao X., Chang C. and Lindewall C.W. 2001. Tillage and crop sequence effect on organic carbon and total nitrogen content in an irrigated Alberta soil. Soil Till. Res. 62: 167–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. use/ (Date: 01.07.2001)Google Scholar
  16. Islam K.R. and Well R.R. 2000. Land use effect on soil quality in a tropical forest ecosystem of Bangladesh. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 79: 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kanchikerimath M. and Singh D. 2001. Soil organic matter and biological properties after 26 years of maize-wheat-cowpea cropping as affected by manure and fertilization in a Cambisol in semiarid region of India. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 86: 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ketterings Q.M., Blair J.M. and Marinissen J.C.Y. 1997. Effects of earthworms on soil aggregate stability and carbon and nitrogen storage in a legume cover crop agro ecosystem. Soil Biol. Biochem. 29: 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lal R. 2002. Soil carbon dynamics in cropland and rangeland. Environ. Pollut. 116: 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lal R., Kimble J. and Follett R. 1998. Land use and C pools in terrestrial ecosystems. In: Lal R., Kimble J.M., Follett R.F. and Stewart B.A. (eds), Management of Carbon Sequestration in Soil. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  21. Lal R., Kimble J. and Stewart B.A. 1995. World soils as a source or sink for radiatively-active gases. In: Lal R. and Stewart B.A. (eds), Soil Management and Greenhouse Effect. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  22. Manjaiah K.M., Voroney R.P. and Sen U. 2000. Soil organic Carbon stocks, storage profile and microbial biomass under different crop management systems in a tropical agricultural ecosystem. Biol. Fertil. Soils 31: 273–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin A., Mariotti A., Balesdent J., Lavelle P. and Vuattoux R. 1990. Estimates of the organic matter turnover rate in a savanna by the 13 C natural abudance. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 22: 517–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McLean E.O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page A.L. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2nd Ed. American Society of Agronomy Monograph No. 9. ASA-SSSA Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 199–224.Google Scholar
  25. Neupane R.P. and Thapa G.B. 2001. Impact of agroforestry intervention on soil fertility and farm income under the subsistence farming system of the middle hills, Nepal. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 84: 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pilbeam C.J., Tripathi B.P., Sherchan D.P., Gregory P.J. and Gaunt J. 2000. Nitrogen balances for households in the mid-hills of Nepal. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 79: 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Post W.M. and Kwon K.C. 2000. Soil carbon sequestration and land use change: processes and potential. Global Change Biol. 6: 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Poudel G.S. and Thapa G.B. 2001. Changing farmer's land management practices in the hills of Nepal. Environ. Manage. 28: 789–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lal R. 2000. Mulching effects on soil physical quality of an alfisol in western Nigeria. Land Degrad. Dev. 11: 383–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. SAS Institute 2000. SAS/Procedures Guide, Release 8 edition. SAS, Cary, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
  31. Singh B.R. and Lal R. 2004. The potential of soil carbon sequestration through improved management practices in Norway. Environ. Develop. Sustainabil. (in press)Google Scholar
  32. Sombroek W., Nachtergaele F. and Hebel A. 1993. Amounts, dynamics and sequestering of carbon in tropical and subtropical soils. Ambio 22: 417–426.Google Scholar
  33. Thapa G.B. 1996. Land use an land management and environment in a subsistence mountain economy in Nepal. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 57: 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tisdall J.M. and Oades J.M. 1982. Organic matter and water stable aggregates in soils. J. Soil Sci. 33: 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trujilo W., Amezquita E., Fisher M.J. and Lal R. 1997. Soil organic carbon dynamics and land use in the Colombian Savannas I. Aggregate size distribution. In: Lal R., Kimble J.M., Follett R.F. and Stewart B.A. (eds), Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp. 267–280.Google Scholar
  36. Unger P.W. 1997. Aggregate and organic carbon concentration interrelationships of a Torrertic Paleustioll. Soil Till. Res. 42: 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • B.M. Shrestha
    • 1
  • B.K. Sitaula
    • 2
  • B.R. Singh
    • 1
  • R.M. Bajracharya
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant and Environmental SciencesAgricultural University of NorwayNorway
  2. 2.Centre for International Environment and Development Studies (Noragric)Agricultural University of NorwayNorway

Personalised recommendations