Confucius and the Cultural Revolution: A Study in Collective Memory

  • Tong Zhang
  • Barry Schwartz


Social Psychology Cultural Revolution Political Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alonso, Ana Maria. 1988. “The Effects of Truth: Re-Presentations of the Past and the Imagining of Community.” Journal of Historical Sociology 1:33–57.Google Scholar
  2. Baigell, Matthew. 1993. “On the Margins of American History.” Pp. 201–20 in Picturing History: American Painting, 1770–1930, edited by William Ayres. New York: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
  3. Barthel, Diane. 1996. Historic Preservation: Collective Memory and Historical Identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bellah, Robert N. 1970. “Civil Religion in America.” Pp. 168–92 in Beyond Belief. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  5. Bellah, Robert N., Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton. 1985. Habits of the Heart. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  6. Ben-Yehuda, Nachman. 1996. The Masada Myth: Collective Memory and Myth making in Israel. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bodnar, John. 1992. Remaking America: Public Memory, Commemoration, and Patriotism in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bond, Michael H. and Kwang-kuo Hwang. 1987. “The Social Psychology of Chinese People.” Pp. 213–266 in The Psychology of the Chinese People. Edited by Michael H. Bond. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bordewich, Fergus M. 1991. “Kong.” Conde Nast Traveler 26:122–125.Google Scholar
  10. Boyarin, Jonathan, ed. 1994. Remapping Memory: The Politics of Time Space. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ching, Frank. 1994. “Confucius, The New Saviour.” Far Eastern Economic Review 157 (Nov. 10): 37Google Scholar
  12. Chong, Woei Lien. 1993. “The Tragic Duality of Man: Lin Xiaobo on Western Philosophy.” Pp. 111–162 in China's Modernization: Westernization and Acculturation. Edited by Kurt Werner Radtke and Tony Saich. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Cooley, Charles Horton. 1918. Social Process. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
  14. Coser, Lewis A., ed., 1992. Maurice Halbwachs on Collective Memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Czarnowski, Stefan. [1919] 1975. Le Culte des Heros ef ses Conditions Social. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
  16. de Bary, William Theordore, Wing-tsit Chan, and Burton Watson. 1960. Sources of Chinese Tradition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. de Tocqueville, Alexis. 1945. Democracy in America. Part 1. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  18. Durkheim, Emile. [1893] 1964. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. ____. [1895] 1950. Rules of the Sociological Method. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. ____. [1915] 1965. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  21. Engardio, Pete. 1995. “China: Move Over, Karl Marx—Here Comes Confucius.” Business Week (May 29):53.Google Scholar
  22. Fran, K. T. 1975. “Why China Criticizes Confucius.” Critica Sociologica 35: 89–96.Google Scholar
  23. Fairbank, John King. 1992. China: A New History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Belknap).Google Scholar
  24. Feng Youlan. 1975. On Confucius. Jiangsu Province, People's Publishing House.Google Scholar
  25. ____. 1985. “Confucius, Confucius, How to Study Confucius.” Tuan Je Bao (Solidarity) Jan. 1.Google Scholar
  26. Fine, Gary Alan. 1996. “Reputational Entrepreneurs and the Image of Harding.” American Journal of Sociology 101:1159–193.Google Scholar
  27. Frankel, Oz. 1996. “Whatever Happened to “Red Emma”? Emma Goldman, from Alien Rebel to American Icon.” Journal of American History (December): 903–942.Google Scholar
  28. Freud, Sigmund. 1939. Moses and Monotheism. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  29. Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretations of Culture. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  31. Gillis, John R., ed. 1994. Commemorations: The Politics of National Identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Gregory, Stanford W. and Jerry M. Lewis. 1988. “Symbols of Collective Memory: The Social Process of Memorializing May 4, 1970 at Kent State University.” Symbolic Interaction 11:213–33.Google Scholar
  33. Gu, Mu. 1989. “Speech at the Opening Ceremony Commemorating the 2540th Anniversary of Confucius' Birth and a Symposium on Confucianism.” Study of Confucius, 1989, vol. 4.Google Scholar
  34. Guo, Moruo. 1954. The Book of Ten Criticisms.Google Scholar
  35. Halbwachs, Maurice. 1926. Les Cadres Sociaux de la Memoire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  36. ____. 1941. La Topographie Legendaire Des Evangiles en Sainte Terre. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  37. Hobart, Michael E. 1989. “The Paradox of Historical Constructionism.” History and Theory 28: 43–58.Google Scholar
  38. Hobsbawm, Eric. 1983. “Mass-Producing Traditions, 1870–1914.” Pp. 263–308 in The Invention of Tradition, edited by E. Hobsbawm and T. Ranger. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hongyan, Li. 1997. “Developments in the Study of Confucianism on the Mainland of China in Recent Years.” Social Sciences in China (Spring): 17–30.Google Scholar
  40. Hou, Xianlin. 1987. “Mao Zedong's Criticism and Inheritance of ‘the Doctrine of the Mean’.” Qi Lu Journal, 1987, vol. 4.Google Scholar
  41. Irwin-Zarecka, Iwona. 1994. Frames of Remembrance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  42. Kammen, Michael. 1991. Mystic Chords of Memory. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  43. Kertzer, David. 1988. Ritual, Politics and Power. New Haven: Yale University Press, p. 71.Google Scholar
  44. Lang, Gladys and Kurt Lang. 1990. Etched in Memory: The Building and Survival of Artistic Reputation. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  45. Liao, Fu-tung. 1985. Virtues Reflected in Children's Picture Story Books During the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Masters Thesis. Department of Sociology, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  46. ____. 1989. “Positive Alienation and Its Reflection in Taoist Thought.” International Sociology 4: 5–17.Google Scholar
  47. ____. 1990. “Women in the Taiping Movement in Nineteenth-Century China.” Pp. 120–133 in Guida West and Rhoda Lois Blumberg, eds., Women and Social Protest. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  48. ____. 1993. “Sitting in Oblivian as a Taoist Practice of Positive Alienation: A Response to Negative Alienation in the Tang Dynasty.” International Sociology 8: 479–492.Google Scholar
  49. Lipset, Seymour M. 1996. American Exceptionalism. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  50. Liu, Shaoqi. [1939] 1964. How to Be a Good Communist. Yenan, China: Institute of Marxism-Leninism.Google Scholar
  51. Louie, Kam. 1980. Critiques of Confucius in Contemporary China. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  52. Lyotard, Jean-Francois. [1979] 1984. The Postmodern Condition. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.Google Scholar
  53. Maines, David R., Sugrue, Norean M. and Katovich, Michael A. 1983. “The Sociological Import of G. H. Mead's Theory of the Past.” American Sociological Review 48: 163, 164, 169.Google Scholar
  54. Mannheim, Karl. 1936. Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
  55. Mao, Zedong. 1938. “Role of the Chinese Communist Party.”Google Scholar
  56. ____. 1940. “On the New Democratism.”Google Scholar
  57. ____. 1955. “A Comment on the Article ‘An Agricultural Producers’ Cooperation Which Increased Production by 67% Within Three Years'.”Google Scholar
  58. Mead, George Herbert. 1929. “The Nature of the Past.” Pp. 235–242 in Essays in Honor of John Dewey, edited by John Coss. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  59. Mu, Zhongjian. 1989. “The Destiny and Prospect of Confucianism in Modern China.” Study of Confucius, vol. 2, pp. 16–23.Google Scholar
  60. Nora, Pierre. 1996. Realms of Memory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Olick, Jeffrey K. 1994. “Collective Memory and Discursive Process: The Nazi Past in West German Politics, 1949–1989.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 12, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  62. Olick, Jeffrey K. and Daniel Levy. 1997. “Collective Memory and Cultural Constraint: Holocaust Myth and Rationality in German Politics.” American Sociological Review. In press.Google Scholar
  63. Pelikan, Yaroslav. 1985. Jesus Through the Centuries. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  64. Peterson, Merrill D. 1962. The Jefferson Image in the American Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Schudson, Michael. 1989. “The Present in the Past Versus the Past in the Present.” Communication 1989, vol. 11, pp. 105–113.Google Scholar
  66. ____. 1994. Watergate in American Memory. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  67. Schuman, Howard and Jacqueline Scott. 1989. “Generations and Collective Memories.” American Sociological Review 54:359–81.Google Scholar
  68. Schwartz, Barry. 1991. “Social Change and Collective Memory: The Democratization of George Washington.” American Sociological Review 56:221–236.Google Scholar
  69. ____. 1996. “Introduction: The Expanding Past.” Qualitative Sociology 19:275–282.Google Scholar
  70. ____. 1997. “Collective Memory and History: How Abraham Lincoln Became a Symbol of Racial Equality.” Sociological Quarterly 38: 469–496.Google Scholar
  71. Shils, Edward A. 1981. Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  72. Smith, Arthur H. 1986 [1894]. Chinese Characteristics. Singapore: Graham Brash Ltd.Google Scholar
  73. Spence, Jonathan D. 1993. “Confucius.” The Wilson Quarterly 17:30–38.Google Scholar
  74. Tuchman, Gaye and Nina Fortin. 1989. Edging Women Out: Victorian Novelists, Publishers, and Social Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Wagner-Pacifici, Robin and Barry Schwartz. 1996. “The Vietnam Veterans Memorial: Commemorating a Difficult Past.” American Journal of Sociology 97: 376–420.Google Scholar
  76. Weber, Max. 1964 [1916]. Religion in China. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  77. Wei-ming, Tu. 1990. “The Confucian Tradition in Chinese History.” Pp. 112–137 in Heritage of China: Contemporary Perspectives on Chinese Civilization. Edited by Paul S. Ropp. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  78. ____. 1991. “Cultural China: The Periphery as the Center.” Daedalus: 1–32.Google Scholar
  79. Whitehead, Raymond L. 1976. “The New Ethic in China and the Anti-Confucius Campaign.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology 12: 16–21.Google Scholar
  80. Yang, Kuo-shu. 1987. “Chinese Personality and Its Change.” Pp. 106–170 in The Psychology of the Chinese People. Edited by Michael H. Bond. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Yang, Yongguo. 1954. The History of Chinese Ancient Thought, pp. 107–111.Google Scholar
  82. Yang, Yongguo. 1974. Confucius: “Sage” of the Reactionary Classes. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.Google Scholar
  83. Zelinsky, Wilbur. 1988. Nation into State: The Shifting Symbolic Foundations of American Nationalism. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  84. Zelizer, Barbie. 1995. “Reading the Past Against the Grain: The Shape of Memory Studies.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 12: 214–239.Google Scholar
  85. Zhang, Dainian. 1989 “Explore the True Meaning of Confucius' Thinking” Study of Confucius, 1989, vol. 3, pp. 32–34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tong Zhang
  • Barry Schwartz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations