Advertisement

Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 112–117 | Cite as

Medication errors in hospital: computerized unit dose drug dispensing system versus ward stock distribution system

  • J. E. Fontan
  • V. Maneglier
  • V.X. Nguyen
  • F. Brion
  • C. Loirat
Article

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rates and types of drug prescription and administration errors in one pediatric nephrology ward, comparing two dispensing schemes : the first one defined as handwritten prescription plus ward stock distribution system (WSDS), and the second one as computerized prescription plus unit dose drug dispensing system (UDDDS). Method: Data were collected over an 8‐week period, from 1 February to 31 March 1999. Two fifth‐year pharmacy students photocopied prescription and administration documents on the ward each day, under the supervision of a senior pharmacist. The medical record analysis was used to compare the prescription with the administration report. Prescribing and administration medication errors were classified according to the American Society of Health‐System Pharmacists.Results: Prescribing errors: overall, for both dispensing schemes, a total of 511 prescriptions, resulting in 4532 prescribed drugs (an average of 9 drugs per prescription) were prescribed. The total prescription error rate was 20.7% (937 of 4532), resulting in 1.9 errors per patient per day. The computerized prescription error rate was 10.6% (419 of 3943), the handwritten prescription error rate was 87.9% (518 of 589). This difference was very significant (P < 0.0001).Administration errors: the total opportunity of administration errors was 4589 (sum of administered and omitted drugs). The total administration error rate was 23.5% (1077 of 4589) including wrong administration time, and 11.7% (538 of 4589) excluding administration time. The administration error rate, including administration associated with time errors, was only 22.5% (888 of 3943) for computerized prescription + UDDDS, compared with 29.3% (189 of 646) for handwritten prescriptions plus WSDS (P < 0.001). Excluding administration associated with time errors, the administration error rates were 9.7% and 24.3%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: The drug prescription and administration error rates were significantly decreased using computerized prescription plus UDDDS as compared with handwritten prescription plus WSDS in a pediatric unit (even with potential biases taken into account).

Administration error Computer France Hospital pharmacy Medication error Pediatrics, Nurse Prescription error 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ASHP Reports. Draft guidelines on preventable medication errors. Am J Pharm 1992; 49: 640–8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASHP Reports. Draft guidelines on preventable medication errors in hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm 1993; 50: 305–14.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barker KN, Allan EL. Research on drug-use-system errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1995; 52: 400–3.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schmitt E. Le risque médicamenteux nosocomial. Paris: Masson, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barker KN, McConnwell WE. The problem of detecting errors in hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm 1962; 19: 361–9.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hynniman CE, Conrad WF, Urch WA, Rudnick BR, Parker PF. A comparison of the medication errors under the unit-dose and traditional drug distribution system in four hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm 1970; 27: 802–14.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fontan JE, Arnaud P, Aujard Y, Boisson A, Léglise J, Brion F. De la prescription à la gestion: apports de l'informatique hospitalière à l'assurance qualité pharmaceutique. J Pharm Clin 1995; 14: 280–8.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barker KN, Kimbrough WW, Heller WM. The medication error problem in hospitals: I - the detection and the use of errors as a measurement of medication system. Hosp Formulary 1966; 1: 29–34.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Allan EL, Barker KN. Fundamentals of medication error research. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990; 47: 555–71.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ASHP Reports. Suggested definitions and relationships among medication misadventures, medication errors, adverse drug events, and adverse drug reactions. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1998; 55: 165–6.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McNally KM, Page MA, Sunderland BV. Failure-mode and effects analysis in improving a drug distribution system. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1997; 54: 171–7.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Flynn E, Barker KN, Pepper GA, Bates DW, Mikeal R. Comparison of methods for detecting medication errors in 36 hospitals and skilled-nursing facilities. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2002; 59: 436–45.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bontemps H, Fauconnier J, Bosson JL, Brilloit C, François P, Calop J. Evaluation de la qualité de la prescription des médicaments dans un CHU. J Pharm Clin 1997; 16: 49–53.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bates DW, Leape LC, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Teich JM et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. J Am Med Assoc 1998; 2080: 1311–6.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schneider MP, Cotting J, Pannatier A. Evaluation of nurses' errors associated with the preparation and administration of medication in a pediatric intensive care unit. Pharm World Sci 1998; 20(4): 178–82.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tisdale JE. Justifying a pediatric critical-care satellite pharmacy by medication error reporting. Am J Hosp Pharm 1986; 43: 368–71.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perlstein PH, Callison C, White M, Barnes B, Edwards NK. Errors in drug computations during newborn intensive care. Am J Dis Child 1979; 133: 376–9.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ross LM, Wallace J, Paton JY. Medication errors in a paediatric teaching hospital in the UK: five years operational experience. BMJ 2000; 83: 492–7.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaushal R, Bates DW, Landrigan C, Mc Kenna K, Clapp MD, Frederico F, Goldman DA. Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatrics. J Am Med Assoc 2001; 2085: 2114–20.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dean BS, Barber ND. A validated, reliable method of scoring the severity of medication errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1999; 56: 57–62.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bates DW, Boyle DL, Van Der Vliet MB. Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events. J Gen Int Med 1995; 10: 199–205.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    ASHP Reports. Guidelines for providing pediatric pharmaceutical services in organized health care systems. Am J Hosp Pharm 1994; 51: 1690–2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. E. Fontan
    • 1
  • V. Maneglier
    • 1
  • V.X. Nguyen
    • 1
  • F. Brion
    • 1
  • C. Loirat
    • 2
  1. 1.Pharmacie et Laboratoire de Toxico‐pharmacologieHôpital Robert Debré AP‐HPParisFrance
  2. 2.Service de Néphrologie PédiatriqueHôpital Robert Debré AP‐HPParisFrance

Personalised recommendations