Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 32, Issue 15, pp 4109–4116 | Cite as

Acid attack on pore-reduced cements

  • D Israel
  • D. E Macphee
  • E. E Lachowski
Article

Abstract

Because the durability of high-performance cements is as important as their strength, the performance of pore-reduced cement (PRC) in aggressive media such as sulfuric, hydrochloric and ethanoic acids, was studied and compared with that of ordinary Portland cement (OPC). The effects of exposure to these media on these cements were monitored by periodic visual inspection and sample weighing. Specific interactions with regard to interconnected porosity were addressed and the corrosion products characterized. PRC is less susceptible than OPC against hydrochloric and ethanoic acids. However, sulfuric acid damages PRC and OPC to almost the same extent. It is shown by electron microprobe analysis that the hydrochloric and ethanoic acids quickly penetrate the interior of normal cement pastes by acid leaching of the interconnected porosity. The reduced porosity of PRC reduces the susceptibility to attack by this mechanism. Sulfuric acid exposure causes extensive formation of gypsum in the cement surface regions, which results in mechanical stress and ultimately leads to spalling. Thus fresh surfaces are exposed regularly and therefore the relatively closed microstructure of PRC is no hindrance to this kind of attack.

Keywords

Gypsum Corrosion Product Ordinary Portland Cement Ettringite Calcium Silicate Hydrate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. D. BIRCHALL, A. J. HOWARD and K. KENDALL, Nature 289 (1981) 388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. KENDALL, A. J. HOWARD and J. D. BIRCHALL, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. (Lond.) A310 (1983) 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. HJORTH, ibid. A310 (1983) 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. R. GOUDA and D. M. ROY, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 59 (1976) 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. O. OYEFESOBI and D. M. ROY, Cem. Concr. Res. 7 (1977) 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. E. MACPHEE, Adv. Cem. Res. 3 (1990) 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. E. MACPHEE, E. E. LACHOWSKI, A. H. TAYLOR and T. J. BROWN, in “Proceedings of the Materials Research Society Symposium”, edited by F. P. Glasser, G. J. McCarthy, J. F. Young, T. O. Mason and P. L. Pratt (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) Vol. 245, p. 303.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. M. GESLIN, D. ISRAEL, E. E. LACHOWSKI and D. E. MACPHEE, in “Proceedings of the Materials Research Society Symposium”, edited by S. Diamond, F. P. Glasser, L. D. Wakely, S. Mindess, J. Skalny and L. Roberts (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995) Vol. 370, p. 237.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. K. METHA, Cem. Concr. Res. 15 (1985) 969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. PAVLÍK, ibid. 24 (1994) 551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Idem, ibid. 24 (1994) 1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. CHANDRA, ibid. 18 (1988) 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    É. REVERTÉGAT, C. RICHET and P. GÉTOUT, ibid. 22 (1992) 2159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. J. REARDON, ibid. 20 (1990) 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. DELAGRAVE, M. PIGEON and É. REVERTÉGAT, ibid. 24 (1994) 1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. J. GARBOCZI, ibid. 20 (1990) 591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. STRUBLE, E. J. GARBOCZI and J. CLIFTON, in “Proceedings of the Materials Research Society Symposium”, edited by F. P. Glasser, G. J. McCarthy, J. F. Young, T. O. Mason and P. L. Pratt (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) Vol. 245, p. 329.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. P. GLASSER, Adv. Ceram. 3 (3rd Meeting) (1988) 139.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. BYFORDS, Cem. Concr. Res. 17 (1987) 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    N. I. FATTUHI and B. P. HUGHES, ibid. 18 (1988) 545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    K. TORII and M. KAWAMURA, ibid. 24 (1994) 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. NISCHER, Z. Straß enforsch. Nr. 793 B 883/2 Widerstand gegen chemischen Angriff (1993) 1.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. LAWRENCE, Mag. Concr. Res. 42 (1990) 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. G. WANG, Cem. Concr. Res. 24 (1994) 735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. S. GOLLOP and H. F. W. TAYLOR, ibid. 25 (1995) 1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. D. COHEN and B. MATHER, ACI Mater. J. 28 (1991) 62.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    P. K. METHA, Cem. Concr. Res. 3 (1973) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    K. OGAWA and D. M. ROY, ibid. 11 (1981) 741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    F. P. GLASSER, D. DAMIDOT and M. ATKINS, Adv. Cem. Res. 7 (1995) 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. GABRISOVÁ, J. HAVLICA and S. SAHU, Cem. Concr. Res. 21 (1991) 1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    J. J. BEAUDOIN, V. S. RAMACHANDRAN and R. F. FELDMANN, Cem. Concr. Res. 20 (1990) 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    H. G. MIDGLEY and J. M. ILLSTON, ibid. 14 (1984) 546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    O. S. B. AL-AMOUDI, M. RASHEEDUZZAFAR, M. MASLEHUDDIN and S. N. ABDULJAUWAD, Mag. Concr. Res. 46 (1994) 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    L. HELLER and M. BEN-YAIR, J. Appl. Chem. 16 (1966) 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    U. BIRNIN-YAURI, PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen (1993).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    K. BYFORDS, Cem. Concr. Res. 17 (1987) 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    H. GRUBE and W. RECHENBERG, ibid. 19 (1989) 783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • D Israel
    • 1
  • D. E Macphee
    • 1
  • E. E Lachowski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of AberdeenMeston Walk OldUK

Personalised recommendations