Advertisement

Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 325–353 | Cite as

Psychosemantics of “One-China” Conception: Fourth-Dimensional Resolution of Taiwan–Mainland Political Deadlock

  • Oliver C. S. Tzeng
Article

Abstract

The political conflicts between Taiwan and the Mainland have progressed, for over 50 years, from the historical “hot civil war” for the “exclusive ownership” of one China's territorial sovereignty to the contemporary “cold rhetoric circularity” around the “geopolitical symbolism” of the one-China principle. In the process, the United States has been intimately entangled in the disputes in terms of 3 alignment stages--from an “unambiguous pro-Taiwan” before the 1970s, the “ambiguous neutrality” in the early 1970s, to the contemporary “pro-Mainland China.” Despite the fact that during the past 3 decades the United States honored the arms sales and the Taiwan Relations Act commitments in Taiwan's favor, and simultaneously conferred the “3 Nos” and 3 communiqués in Mainland China's favor, the cross-Strait tensions have persisted without the prospect of a definitive foreseeable resolution. Further, because of the lack of explicit conception of “one China,” the United States has to constantly resist the opposing persuasions of the 2 sides, and therefore must continue to rely on the “ambiguous dual deterrence strategy” for maintaining the “dynamics balance” over the Taiwan Strait. For such endeavors, the Clinton “4 frameworks” and the Bush “5 Taiwan policies” have proven to be very effective, but mostly to the extent of assuming a “passive” role in preventing military confrontations.

China-Taiwan conflict Sino-American dilemmas fourth-dimensional model permanent resolution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bodeen, C. (1999, July 15). Taiwanese president says nation is not pushing for independence. Indianapolis Star, p. A2.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, S. B. (2002, January 4). Meeting challenges, moving forward New Year message (Presidential address). Taipei Journal, p. 7.Google Scholar
  3. Chiu, Y. W. (2000, September 22). Forging links with the mainland. Taipei Journal, p. 3.Google Scholar
  4. Editorial of World Journal (2002, February 14). New Year's prospective in possible changes of the US-China-Taiwan trilateral relations. World Journal, p. A2.Google Scholar
  5. Editorial of World Journal. (2002, February 23). Accurate reading of the impact of Bush's Beijing Trip on cross-Strait relations. World Journal, p. A2.Google Scholar
  6. Faison, S. (1999, July 23). Taiwan's president reaffirms “state-to-state” stand. Indianapolis Star, p. A2.Google Scholar
  7. Friedman, T. (1999, September 3). What's not happening with China? Indianapolis Star.Google Scholar
  8. Hsu, J. (2000, November 24). Technology to spur relations. Taipei Journal, p. 1.Google Scholar
  9. Jelinek, P. (2000). Taiwan promotes talks with China. AOL, AP-NY–06–15–00 1249EDT. p. 1.Google Scholar
  10. Kraft, V. M. (1991). The U.S. constitution and foreign policy: Termination of the Taiwan treaty. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lee, K. Y. (2000, October 1). Abstract of Kee Kwan-Yeau Memoirs, 1965–2000. World Journal Weekly, p. 14.Google Scholar
  12. Ling, P. C. (1999, May 19). Taiwan security: U.S. Congress' proposal of strengthening act. World Journal.Google Scholar
  13. Meisner, M. (1999). Mao's China and after: A history of the People's Republic. New York: Free Press (pp. 528–532).Google Scholar
  14. Sly, L. (1999, July 13). Taiwan angers China with talk of sovereignty. Indianapolis Star, p. A2.Google Scholar
  15. Sun, J. M. (2002, February 28). Special interview of Henry Harding. World Journal, p. A3.Google Scholar
  16. Tzeng, O. C. S. (1999). Fourth dimensional resolution of triangular entanglements among the U.S., China and Taiwan. Indianapolis, IN: 4th-Dimensional Resolution Strategies.Google Scholar
  17. Watson, R. (1996, March 25). On a gunboat to China: Carriers deploy as the pressure on Taiwan increases. Newsweek, p. 37.Google Scholar
  18. World Journal News. (2000, June 20). Taiwan Strait's three-win condition faces three losses: The US Peace Research Institute proposes to Washington the cross-Strait re-negotiations method. World Journal, p. A2.Google Scholar
  19. World Journal Taipei 29th Telegraph. (2002, January 29). Bush's trip to China will not sacrifice Taiwan. World Journal, p. A1.Google Scholar
  20. World Journal Taipei 1st Telegraph. (2002, February 1). On new premier Yiu See-Kuan's lead of a “combative cabinet.” World Journal, p. A2.Google Scholar
  21. Wu, A. C. (1998, October 31). Relations across the Taiwan Strait: Retrospect and prospect. Paper presented at The 40th Annual Convention of the American Association for Chinese Studies, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Zhao, S. (1999, July 2–5). Military coercion and peaceful offense: Beijing's strategy of national reunification with Taiwan. Proceedings of the 1999 Chinese American Academic and Professional Convention, Washington DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver C. S. Tzeng
    • 1
  1. 1.Osgood Laboratory for Cross-Cultural Research, Department of PsychologyIndiana University–Purdue University at IndianapolisIndianapolis

Personalised recommendations