Advertisement

Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 1–4 | Cite as

Pharmaceutical care research: hard or soft? — Part II

  • Mark P. Mobach
Commentary

Abstract

In pharmaceutical care research (PCR) quantitative research methodologies are strongly represented. However, in PCR also other qualities should be included in the tool kit of the researcher. For that purpose, it is argued that social science provides rich frameworks applicable for PCR. It offers both quantitative and qualitative methodological frameworks. In the most challenging and powerful field work the two approaches are combined. The case study design is a framework to synthesise quantitative and qualitative research approaches. For the development of PCR the case study design may be an important addition to the tool kit of its researchers.

Case study research Hard research Methodology Pharmaceutical care Pharmaceutical care research Qualitative research Quantitative research Soft Research 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mobach, MP. From the Laboratory to Pharmaceutical Care Research. Pharm World Sci; In review processGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burrel G, Morgan G. Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. Aldershot: Arena; 1993. ISBN 1-85742-114-0Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Argyris C, Schön DA. Organizational Learning: a Theory of Action Perspective. Reading Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley; 1978. ISBN 0-201-00174-8Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schön DA. The Reflective Practitioner, how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books; 1983. ISBN 1-85742-319-4Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Argyris C. On Organizational Learning. Cambridge Massachusetts: Blackwell; 1993. 1-557-86262-1Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Argyris C, Schön DA. Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice. Reading Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley; 1996. ISBN 0-201-62983-6Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Odedina FT, Segal R. Behavioral pharmaceutical care scale for measuring pharmacists' activities. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 1996;53:855–65Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cipolle RJ, Strand LM, Morley PC. Pharmaceutical Care Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1998. ISBN 0-07-012046-3Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Mil JWF. Pharmaceutical Care the Future of Pharmacy, theory, research and practice [Dissertation]. Zuidlaren: J.W.F. van Mil; 1999. ISBN 90-9013367-4Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Azzopardi LM. Validation Instruments for Community Pharmacy, pharmaceutical care for the third millennium [Dissertation]. New York: Pharmaceutical Products Press; 2000. ISBN 0-7890-1109-3Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. ISBN 0-8039-4679-1Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cambell TD. Quantitative Knowing in Action Research. New Orleans: Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association; August-September 1974.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gherardi S, Turner BA. Real Men Don't Collect Soft Data. Trento: Università di Trento; 1987.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vickers G. Human Systems are Different. London: Harper & Row Publishers; 1983. ISBN 0-06-318262-9Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Romesburg CH. Cluster Analysis for Researchers. Belmont: Lifetime Learning Publications; 1984. ISBN 0-89464-426-2Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anderberg MR. Cluster Analysis for Applications. New York: Academic Press; 1973. ISBN 0-12-057650-3Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Checkland PB. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 1999. ISBN 0-471-98606-2Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis, an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. ISBN 0-8039-4653-8Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wilson JV, Bolland JM. Modeling Anomalies-a case for qualitative research. Athens: Conference on Qualitative Research in Education. January 1992.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cook TD, Reichardt CS. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1979. ISBN 0-8039-3077-1Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bryman A. Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman; 1988. ISBN 0-04-312040-7Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fielding NG, Fielding JL. Linking Data. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1986. ISBN 0-8039-2568-8Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brewer J, Hunter A. Multimethod Research, a synthesis of styles. Newbury Park: Sage; 1989. ISBN 0-8039-3077-1Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mobach MP. Thought and Action, change to the customer in community pharmacy practice [Dissertation]. Capelle a/d IJssel: Labyrint Publication; 1999. ISBN 90-72591-70-4Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yin RK. Case Study Research, design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. ISBN 0-8039-5663-0Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beaumont W. Experiments and Observations on the Gastric Juice and the Physiology of Digestion. New York: Dover Publications; 1959Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    De Leeuw ACJ, Volberda HW. On the Concept of Flexibility: A Dual Perspective. Omega Int J Mgmt Sci 1996;24(2):121–139Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cassell C, Symon G. Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, a practical guide. London: Sage; 1994. ISBN 0-8039-8770-6Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Patton MQ. How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage; 1987. ISBN 0-8039-3129-8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark P. Mobach
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Management and OrganizationGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations