Advertisement

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 249, Issue 2, pp 519–522 | Cite as

Elemental analysis in cultured cells, tobacco and grape, treated with aluminum

  • K. Tanoi
  • H. Iikura
  • T. M. Nakanishi
Article

Abstract

We discussed the relationship between Al toxicity and the Al, Fe andB amount of element in tobacco and grape cells. Al and Fe were analyzed byneutron activation analysis and B was analyzed by prompt gamma-ray analysis.Callose content was also measured as an indicator of cell damage induced Altoxicity. When tobacco cells were incubated in 1 mM and 300 µM Al solution,the pattern of callose formation was much similar to that of Fe accumulationthan that of Al accumulation in tobacco cells, suggesting that the increaseof Fe content induced toxic effect along with Al incorporated into the cells.However, this tendency was not observed in grape cells. Boron content didnot show any relation to those of Al or Fe throughout the Al treatment inboth tobacco and grape cells.

Keywords

Aluminum Physical Chemistry Toxicity Inorganic Chemistry Boron 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. V. Kochian, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 46 (1995) 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Z. Rengel, New Phytol., 134 (1996) 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Yamamoto,A. Hachiya,H. Matsumoto, Plant Cell Physiol., 38 (1997) 1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. H. Yang,H. Y. Zhang, J. Plant Nutr., 21 (1998) 1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. E. Lenoble,D. G. Blevins,R. J. Miles, Plant Cell Environ., 19 (1996) 1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Stringari,F. Moeller,A. Ceschini,O. FAILLA, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 27 (1996) 1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Iikura,K. Tanoi,T. M. Nakanishi, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 249 (2001) 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. KÖhle,W. Jeblick,F. Poten,W. Blaschek,H. Kauss, Plant Physiol., 77 (1985) 544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Nagata,K. Okada,I. Tabata, Plant Cell Reports, 1 (1982) 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Yamakawa,K. Ishida,S. Kato,T. Kodama,Y. Minoda, Agric. Biol. Chem., 47 (1983) 997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. M. Nakanishi,H. Iikura,T. Kataoka,M. Tamada,J. Furukawa,C. Yonezawa, Boron in Soils and Plants, R. W. Bell andB. Rerkasem (Eds), Proc. of Intern. Symp. on Boron in Soils and Plants, Sep. 1997, Thailand, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997, p. 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. C. Chang,Y. Yamamoto,H. Matsumoto, Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 45 (1999) 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Yonezawa, Anal. Sci., 12 (1996) 605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers/Akadémiai Kiadó 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Tanoi
    • 1
  • H. Iikura
    • 1
  • T. M. Nakanishi
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Agricultural and Life SciencesThe University of TokyoBunkyo-ku, TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations