Advertisement

Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 195–208 | Cite as

Cookies, web bugs, webcams and cue cats: Patterns of surveillance on the world wide web

  • Colin J. Bennett
Article

Abstract

This article addresses the question of whether personal surveillance on the world wide web is different in nature and intensity from that in the offline world. The article presents a profile of the ways in which privacy problems were framed and addressed in the 1970s and 1990s. Based on an analysis of privacy news stories from 1999–2000, it then presents a typology of the kinds of surveillance practices that have emerged as a result of Internet communications. Five practices are discussed and illustrated: surveillance by glitch, surveillance by default, surveillance by design, surveillance by possession, and surveillance by subject. The article offers some tentative conclusions about the progressive latency of tracking devices, about the complexity created by multi-sourcing, about the robustness of clickstream data, and about the erosion of the distinction between the monitor and the monitored. These trends emphasize the need to reject analysis that frames our understanding of Internet surveillance in terms of its “impact” on society. Rather the Internet should be regarded as a “form of life” whose evolving structure becomes embedded in human consciousness and social practice, and whose architecture embodies an inherent valence that is gradually shifting away from the assumptions of anonymity upon which the Internet was originally designed.

Keywords

Information System User Interface Social Practice Human Computer Interaction Technology Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Colin J. Bennett. Computers, Personal Data and Theories of Technology: Comparative Approaches to Privacy Protection in the 1990s. Science, Technology and Human Values, 16: 51–69, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Tim Berners-Lee. Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web. San Francisco: Harper, 1999.Google Scholar
  3. Ann Cavoukian and Don Tapscott. Who Knows: Safeguarding your Privacy in a Networked World. Toronto: Random House, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. Roger Clarke. Information Technology and Dataveillance. Communications of the ACM, 31 (5): 498–512, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christopher Dandeker. Surveillance, Power and Modernity: Bureaucracy and Discipline from 1700 to the Present Day. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. Michel Foucault. The Subject and Power. In H. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow, editors, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  7. Simson Garfinkel. Database Nation: The Death of Privacy in the 21st Century. Sebastopol Ca: O'Reilly, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. Tim Jordan. Cyberpower: The Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. Lawrence Lessig. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. David Lyon. The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. Gary T. Marx. UnderCover: Police Surveillance in America. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  12. Ithiel de Sola Pool. Technologies of Freedom: On Free Speech in the Electronic Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  13. Joel R. Reidenberg. Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, 52 (5): 1315–1371, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Joel R. Reidenberg. Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules through Technology. Texas Law Review, 76 (3): 552–593, 1998.Google Scholar
  15. Marc Rotenberg. Fair Information Practices and the Architecture of Privacy (What Larry Doesn't Get). Stanford Technology Law Review, 2001.Google Scholar
  16. Paul Schwartz. Privacy and Democracy in Cyberspace. Vanderbilt Law Review, 52 (6): 1610–1702, 1999.Google Scholar
  17. Andrew L. Shapiro. The Control Revolution. New York: Century Foundation, 1999.Google Scholar
  18. Richard Smith. Gadgets that Spy. Presentation to the 2001 Computers, Freedom and Privacy conference, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  19. David J. Todd. Politicizing Privacy: Focussing Events and the Dynamics of Conflict. MA Thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Victoria, 2001.Google Scholar
  20. Malcolm Warner and Michael Stone. The Databank Society: Organizations, Computers, and Social Freedom. London: Allen & Unwin, 1970.Google Scholar
  21. Alan F. Westin and Michael Baker. Databanks in a Free Society: Computers, Record-Keeping, and Privacy. New York: Quadrangle Books, 1972.Google Scholar
  22. Alan F. Westin. Introduction. In Donald A. Marchand, editor, The Politics of Privacy, Computers and Criminal Justice Records. Arlington Va: Information Resources Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  23. Langdon Winner. Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  24. Langdon Winner. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in the Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin J. Bennett
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations