Advertisement

Pharmacy World & Science

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 96–101 | Cite as

Characteristics of current benzodiazepine users as indicators of differences in physical and mental health

  • Rolf van Hulten
  • K. Bart Teeuw
  • Arnold B. Bakker
  • Albert Bakker
  • Hubert G. Leufkens
Article

Abstract

The relationship between characteristics of benzodiazepine exposure and health-status was examined in order to investigate risk profiles of benzodiazepine users.In the only pharmacy of a Dutch community of 13,500 inhabitants, all current benzodiazepine users that presented with a benzodiazepine prescription in November 1994 were invited to participate. On the basis of the RAND-36 questionnaire, summary scores for both physical and mental health were calculated, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). After dichotomization with a cut-off point indicating seriously impaired health and after the combination of the PCS and MCS, four different categories of health status could be identified. We used logistic regression to study the relation between these four different groups with respect to benzodiazepine exposure.In total a group of 360 current benzodiazepine users was studied. Results showed that almost one-third of the participants had no significant impaired health; this group was further classified as reference group. We classified three other groups: one with physical problems (31%), one with mental problems (18%), and one with a combination of the two (22%). Multivariate analysis showed differences in risk factors for an impaired health status. The group with impaired physical health was associated with self-reported indication for muscle relaxation, hypnotic use, and a high CDS (Chronic Disease Score). The group with impaired mental health was associated with more frequent consulting of a mental health care specialist and with a low sense of self-efficacy. The group with both impaired physical as well as mental health was associated with a higher incidence of widowhood, a lower sense of self-efficacy, a high CDS, using benzodiazepines more than prescribed, and reporting depression as reason for their benzodiazepine use.In particular, two groups need critical examination: a group of apparently healthy users with long-term benzodiazepine use; and a frail group with impaired physical and mental health and using a higher dose than prescribed. Patient counseling and management of these four groups can be tailored to the specific needs of each group.

Benzodiazepines Health Status RAND-36 PCS MCS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Woods JH, Katz JL, Winger G. Benzodiazepines: Use, Abuse, and Consequences. Pharm. Reviews 1992; 44 151-338.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nicholson AN. Hypnotics. Their Place in Therapeutics. Drugs 1986;31:164-76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shader RI, Greenblatt DJ. Use of Benzodiazepines in Anxiety Disorders. N Engl J Med 328;1993:1398-405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mellinger GD, Balter MB, Uhlenhuth EH. Prevalence and Correlates of the Long-term Regular Use of Anxiolytics. JAMA 1984;251:375-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Simpson RJ, Power KG, Wallace LA, Butcher MH, Swanson V, Simpson EC. Controlled comparison of the characteristics of long-term benzodiazepine users in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 1990;40:22-6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rodrigo EK, King MB, Williams P. Health of long term benzodiazepine users. BMJ 1988;296:603-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mant A, Mattick RP, De Burgh S, Donnelly N, Hall W. Benzodiazepine prescribing in general practice: dispelling some myths. Fam Pract 1995;12:37-43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Romach M, Busto U, Somer G, Kaplan HL, Sellers E. Clinical Aspects of Chronic Use of Alprazolam and Lorazepam. Am J Psychiatry 1995;152(8):1161-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salinsky JV, Dore CJ. Characteristics of long term benzodiazepine users in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract 1987; 37:202-4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Olfson M, Pincus HA. Use of Benzodiazepines in the Community. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 1235-40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marino S. Ill-health and Social Predictors of Psychotropic Drug Prescription in General Practice. Int J Soc Psychiatry 1993;39:167-76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heerdink BE, Leufkens HGM, Koppedraijer C, Bakker A. Information on drug use in the elderly: a comparison of pharmacy, general practitioner and patient data. Pharm World Sci 1995;17(1):20-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leufkens HG, Herings RMC, Koll^ffel WJ, Bakker A. Concomitant drug use among patients on cardiac glycosides. Int J Risk Saf Med 1991;2:11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Balter MB, Uhlenhuth EH. New epidemiologic findings about insomnia and its treatment. J Clin Psychiatry 1992;53:Suppl 12:34-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leufkens HG, Urquhart J. Automated record linkage and other approaches to pharmacoepidemiology in the Netherlands. In: Strom BL, ed. Pharmacoepidemiology. 2nd ed. Chisester: John Wiley & Sons, 1994:231-44.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leufkens HG. Patient targeting and outcomes (editorial). Pharm World Sci 1997;19(2): V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leufkens HG, Urquhart J. Variability in Patterns of Drug Usage. J Pharm Pharmacol 1994;46:433-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ware JE, Koskinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 physical and mental summary scales: a user¥s manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, 1994.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ware JE, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, McHorney CA, Rogers WH, Raczek A. Comparison of Methods for the Scoring and Statistical Analysis of SF-36 Health Profile and Summary Measures: Summary of Results from the Medical Outcome Study. Med Care 1995;33:AS264-79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van der Zee KI, Sanderman R. Het meten van de algemene ezondheidstoestand met de RAND-36. Een Handleiding [Measuring general health status with the RAND-36. Users Manual]. Groningen: Northern Center of Health Care Research, 1993Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), I: Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ 1993;2:217-27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Anonymous. Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification index. Oslo: World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, 1993.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hekster YA, Vree TB et al. The defined daily dose per 100 beddays as a unit of comparison and a parameter for studying antimicrobial drug use in a university hospital. J Clin Hosp Pharm 1982;7:251-60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Von Korff M, Wagner EH, Saunders K. A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45: 197-203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Johnson RE, Hornbrook MC, Nichols GA. Replicating the chronic disease score (CDS) from automated pharmacy data. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47(10):1191-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schwarzer R. Measurement of Perceived Self-Efficacy. Psychometric Scales for Cross-Cultural Research. Berlin, Germany: Freie Universitat Berlin, 1993.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Van Hulten R, Heerdink ER, Bakker A, Leufkens HG. Benzodiazepine Pathways in the Chronically Ill. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1999,8:325-30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Swartz M, Landerman R, George LK, Melville ML, Blazer D, Smith K. Benzodiazepine Anti-anxiety Agents: Prevalence and Correlates of Use in a Southern Community. Am J Public Health 1991;81:592-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Badia JG, Blay-Pueyo C, Soler-Vila M. Risk Factors in the Use of Benzodiazepines. Family Practice. 1988; 5, no 4:283-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Uhlenhuth EH, Balter MB, Mellinger GD. Clinical Variables in Pharmacoepidemiology. J Psychiat Res 1993;27:89-95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rodney J, Prior N, Cooper B, Theodorus M, Browning J, Steinberg B, Evans L. The comorbidity of anxiety and depression. Austr New Zeal J Psychiatr 1997,31:700-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rolf van Hulten
    • 1
  • K. Bart Teeuw
    • 1
  • Arnold B. Bakker
    • 2
  • Albert Bakker
    • 1
  • Hubert G. Leufkens
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS)Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Social and Organizational PsychologyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations