Advertisement

Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 140–146 | Cite as

Sex differences in the medication choice for hypertension in general practice. A study with written case simulations

  • Olaf H. Klungel
  • Arsenio H.P. Paes
  • Anthonius de Boer
  • Marijke M. Kuyvenhoven
  • Jacob C. Seidell
  • Albert Bakker
Article

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore explanations for the preference of physicians to prescribe β‐blockers to hypertensive men and diuretics to hypertensive women.A qualitative study among 12 family physicians was conducted with a combination of written case simulations, semi‐structured interviews and statements on attitudes of physicians towards antihypertensive drug choice.Among the male hypertensive cases the most frequently prescribed drugs were β‐blockers, whereas among the female hypertensive cases diuretics were more often prescribed. Physician characteristics associated with a preferred prescribing of β‐blockers to hypertensive men and diuretics to hypertensive women were: older age (no residency in family medicine), the believe that β‐blockers are more effective in men with regard to lowering blood pressure and that diuretics are more effective in women, a non‐evidence based attitude and a sex‐related attitude towards the choice of β‐blockers and diuretics in general, and in particular towards the prescribing of β‐blockers to hypertensive men because men have a higher absolute risk of coronary heart disease than women. An additional explanation for these findings may be the higher prevalence of ankle oedema among women. Patient characteristics associated with more prescribing of β‐blockers to hypertensive men and diuretics to hypertensive women were: current employment and a "high‐risk" profile in terms of blood pressure level and additional cardiovascular risk factors.Although, most considerations underlying a preferred prescribing of β‐blockers to hypertensive men and diuretics to hypertensive women were not evidence‐based, the actual choice of antihypertensive drug (diuretic or β‐blocker) was evidence‐based. These considerations may also play a role in the sex difference in the choice of calcium antagonists and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and require further investigation.

Antihypertensive drugs General practice Sex differences Written case simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Klungel OH, de Boer A, Paes AH, Seidell JC, Bakker A. Sex differences in the pharmacological treatment of hypertension: a review of population-based studies. J Hypertens 1997; 15:591-600.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mallick R, Leader S. Demographic differences in antihypertensive drug prescribing and treatment outcomes [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safety 1997; 6 (suppl 2):S4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McAlister FA, Teo KK, Lewanczuk RZ, Wells G, Montague TJ. Contemporary practice patterns in the management of newly diagnosed hypertension. Can Med Assoc J 1997; 157:23-30.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Psaty BM, Savage PJ, Tell GS, Polak JF, Hirsch CH, Gardin JM, et al. Temporal patterns of antihypertensive medication use among elderly patients. The cardiovascular health study. JAMA 1993; 270:1837-41.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Collins R, MacMahon S. Blood pressure, antihypertensive drug treatment and the risks of stroke and of coronary heart disease. Br Med Bull 1994; 50:272-98.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jackson R, Barham P, Bills J, Birch T, McLennan L, MacMahon S, et al. Management of raised blood pressure in New Zealand: a discussion document. BMJ 1993; 307:107-10.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Joint National committee of on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The Sixth Report of the Joint National committee of on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:2413-46.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ramsay LE, Williams B, Johnston GD, MacGregor GA, Poston L, Potter JF, et al. British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 1999: summary. BMJ 1999; 319:630-5.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walma EP, Grundmeijer HGLM, Thomas S, Prins A, Hoogen van den JPH, Laan van der JR. NHG-Standaard hypertensie (-eerste herziening) [in Dutch]. Huisarts Wet 1997; 40:598-617.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siscovick DS, Raghunathan TE, Psaty BM, Koepsell TD, Wicklund KG, Lin X, et al. Diuretic therapy for hypertension and the risk of primary cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 1994; 330:1852-7.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoes AW, Grobbee DE, Lubsen J, Man in ‘t Veld AJ, van der Does E, Hofman A. Diuretics, beta-blockers, and the risk for sudden cardiac death in hypertensive patients. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123:481-7.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoes AW, Grobbee DE, Lubsen J. Sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertension. An association with diuretics and beta-blockers? Drug Saf 1997; 16:233-41.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Psaty BM, Smith NL, Siscovick DS, Koepsell TD, Weiss NS, Heckbert SR, et al. Health outcomes associated with antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents. A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 1997; 277:739-45.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Medical Research Council trial of treatment of hypertension in older adults: principal results. MRC Working Party. BMJ 1992; 304:405-12.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pearce KA, Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Kirk J. Cost-minimization and the number needed to treat in uncomplicated hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1998; 11:618-29.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Klungel OH, De Boer A, Paes AHP, Seidell JC, Bakker A. Sex differences in antihypertensive drug use. Determinants of the choice of medication for hypertension. J Hypertens 1998; 16:1545-53.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Denig P, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM. ‘Thinking aloud’ as a method of analysing the treatment decisions of physicians. Eur J Public Health 1994; 4:55-9.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quik-Van Milligen MLT, Kuyvenhoven MM, Melker RA, Koudstaal PJ, Van Gijn J. Transient Ischaemic Attacks and the General Practitioner: diagnostics and management. Cerebrovasc Dis 1992; 2:102-6.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16:297-334.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ 1997; 314:572.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Walma EP, Hoes AW, Dooren van C, Prins A, Does van der E. Withdrawal of long term diuretic medication in elderly patients: a double blind randomised trial. BMJ 1997; 315:464-8.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    de Jonge JW, Knottnerus JA, van Zutphen WM, de Bruijne GA, Struijker Boudier HA. Short term effect of withdrawal of diuretic drugs prescribed for ankle oedema. BMJ 1994; 308:511-3.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    van Kraaij DJ, Jansen RW, Bruijns E, Gribnau FW, Hoefnagels WH. Diuretic usage and withdrawal patterns in a Dutch geriatric patient population. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45:918-22.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    De Jonge J-W. Diuretic drug cessation in general practice. Withdrawing diuretic drugs prescribed for ankle oedema [Dissertation]. Department of general practice. Maastricht: University of Limburg, 1993:183.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Statistical yearbook 1998. Voorburg: Central Bureau of statistics, 1998.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wingard DL, Suarez L, Barrett-Connor E. The Sex Differential in Mortality from all Causes and Ischemic Heart Disease. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 117:165-72.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wingard DL, Cohn BA, Kaplan GA, Cirillo PM, Cohen RD. Sex differentials in morbidity and mortality risks examined by age and cause in the same cohort. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 130:601-10.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lerner DJ, Kannel WB. Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: A 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J 1986; 111:383-90.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kuyvenhoven M, de Melker R, van der Velden K. Prescription of antibiotics and prescribers’ characteristics. A study into prescription of antibiotics in upper respiratory tract infections in general practice. Fam Pract 1993; 10:366-70.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Evans CE, Haynes RB, Gilbert JR, Taylor DW, Sackett DL, Johnston M. Educational package on hypertension for primary care physicians. Can Med Assoc J 1984; 130:719-22.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Philipp T, Anlauf M, Distler A, Holzgreve H, Michaelis J, Wellek S. Randomised, double blind, multicentre comparison of hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol, nitrendipine, and enalapril in antihypertensive treatment: results of the HANE study. HANE Trial Research Group. BMJ 1997; 315:154-9.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Applegate WB, Phillips HL, Schnaper H, Shepherd AM, Schocken D, Challop J, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of three antihypertensive agents on blood pressure control and quality of life in older women. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151:1817-23.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Materson BJ, Reda DJ, Cushman WC, Massie BM, Freis ED, Kochar MS, et al. Single-drug therapy for hypertension in men. A comparison of six antihypertensive agents with placebo. The Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:914-21.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Neaton JD, Grimm RH, Jr., Prineas RJ, Stamler J, Grandits GA, Elmer PJ, et al. Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study. Final results. Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study Research Group. JAMA 1993; 270:713-24.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Staessen JA, Fagard R, Thijs L, Celis H, Arabidze GG, Birkenhäger WH, et al. Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Lancet 1997;350:757-64.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Niskanen L, Lanke J, Niklason A, et al. Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trial. Lancet 1999;353:611-6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olaf H. Klungel
    • 1
  • Arsenio H.P. Paes
    • 2
  • Anthonius de Boer
    • 2
  • Marijke M. Kuyvenhoven
    • 3
  • Jacob C. Seidell
    • 4
  • Albert Bakker
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of PharmacyUniversiteit UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of PharmacyUniversiteit UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of General PracticeUtrecht Medical Centre Utrecht (UMCU)Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Chronic Diseases EpidemiologyNational Institute of Public Health and the EnvironmentBilthovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations