Advertisement

Establishment of exotic parasitoids of the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in Colombia through farmer participatory research

  • Luis F. AristizábalEmail author
  • Hugo M. Salazar
  • Carlos G. Mejía
  • Mauricio Jiménez
  • Alex E. Bustillo
  • Steven P. Arthurs
Research Paper

Abstract

A participatory project was conducted with small-scale coffee growers from Quindío Department, Colombia. In 34 coffee lots in three municipalities, growers implemented an integrated management programme against the coffee berry borer (CBB) Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari, based on improved cultural harvesting and sanitation practices (to remove breeding habitats) and releases of exotic parasitoids. Growers released over 10 million Cephalonomia stephanoderis and 5 million Prorops nasuta (both Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) over 2 years. Populations of the CBB declined from a range of 7–14% infested berries (Quimbaya), 10–13% (Montenegro) and 15–48% (Buenavista) prior to the integrated pest management programme, to an average of 2.1 ± 0.2% infested berries in Químbaya, 3.5 ± 0.2% in Montenegro and 2.8 ± 2.1% in Buenavista, over the following 25 months. Damage to parchment coffee similarly declined during this period. Six months after the final release of parasitoids had been made, we found both parasitoid species established in all three municipalities. However, P. nasuta were recovered more frequently (in 71.4% of lots where they were previously released) compared with C. stephanoderis (recovered in 30.8% of release lots). Average parasitism rates remained low, i.e. 3.7% for P. nasuta and 2.9% for C. stephanoderis. This low rate was probably due to the frequent manual removal of mature berries containing developing parasitoid larvae. In addition, the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana was observed on average on 9.5% adult CBB in Montenegro, compared with mean infection rates of 4.3 and 4.4% in Quimbaya and Buenavista, respectively. Cultural harvesting and sanitation is an important component of CBB control, although it may limit the impact of the pest’s parasitoids.

Key words

Hypothenemus hampei Cephalonomia stephanoderis Prorops nasuta participatory research 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham Y. J., Moore D. and Godwin G. (1990) Rearing and aspects of biology of Cephalonomia stephanoderis and Prorops nasuta (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) parasitoids of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 30, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arcila J., Jaramillo A., Baldión V. and Bustillo A. E. (1993) La floración del cafeto y su relación con el control de la broca. Avances Técnico No. 193. Cenicafé, Chinchiná, Colombia. 6 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Aristizábal L. F., Bustillo A. E., Jiménez M. and Trujillo H. I. (2004a) Memorias V encuentro de caficultores experimentadores. Manejo integrado de la broca del café a través de investigatión participativa. Convenio Colciencias- Federacafé — Cenicafé. Fundación Manuel Mejía, Chinchiná, 21–22 September 2004. 70 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Aristizábal L. F., Jiménez M., Bustillo A. E. and Arthurs S. P. (2011) Monitoring cultural practices for coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) management in a small coffee farm in Colombia. Florida Entomologist 94, 685–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aristizábal L. F., Salazar H. M. and Mejía C. G. (2002) Changes in the adoption of the components of coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) integrated management, thorough participative methodologies. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 28, 153–160.Google Scholar
  6. Aristizábal L. F., Salaza H. M., Mejía C. G. and Bustillo A. E. (2004b) Introductión y evaluatión de Phymastichus coffea (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) en fincas de pequeños caficultores, a través de investigation participativa. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 30, 219–224.Google Scholar
  7. Aristizábal L. F., Vélez J. C. and León C. A. (2006) Diagnostics of the coffee berry borer integrated management, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) with coffee growers from Caldas. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 32, 117–124.Google Scholar
  8. Baker P. S. (1999) The Coffee Berry Borer in Colombia. Final Report of the DIFI — Cenicafé — CABI Bioscience IPM for Coffee Project. Cenicafé, Chinchiná, Colombia. 154 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Baker P. S., Barrera J. F. and Rivas A. (1992) Life history studies of the coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei, Scolytidae) on coffee trees in southern Mexico. Journal of Applied Ecology 29, 656–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barrera J. F. (2005) Investigaciónes sobre la broca del café en Mexico: logros, retos y perspectivas, pp. 1–13. In Simposio sobre Situatión Actual y Perspectivas de la Investigatión y Manejo de la Broca del Café en Costa Rica, Cuba, Guatemala y México (edited by J. F. Barrera). Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología y El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Tapachula Chiapas.Google Scholar
  11. Barrera J. F., Baker P. S., Schwarz A. and Valenzuela J. (1990) Introducción de dos especies de parasitoides africanos a México para el control biológico del la broca del cafeto Hypothenemus hampei (Ferr.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Folia Entomológica Mexicana 79, 245–247.Google Scholar
  12. Benavides P., Bustillo A. E., Montoya E. C., Cárdenas R. and Mejía C. G. (2002) Participatión del control cultural, químico y biológico en el manejo de la broca del café. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 28, 161–166.Google Scholar
  13. Bentley W. J., Baker S. P., Aristizabal L. F., Campos O., Chilan W., Garcia A., Munoz R., Jarquin A., Larco A., Mejía C. G. and Salazar M. (2002) Manual for Collaborative Research with Smallholder Farmers. ‘What we Learned from the CFC-IPM Coffee Project’, CABI Commodities, Egham, Surrey. 131 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Bustillo A. E. (2005) El papel del control biológico en el manejo integrado de la broca del café, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 29, 55–68.Google Scholar
  15. Bustillo A. E., Bernai M. G., Benavides P. and Chaves B. (1999) Dynamics of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae infecting Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) populations emerging from fallen coffee berries. Florida Entomologist 82, 491–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bustillo A. E., Cárdenas R., Villalba D. A., Benavides P., Orozco J. and Posada F. J. (1998) Manejo integrado de la broca del café Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) en Colombia. Centro Nacional de Investigaciones de Café (Cenicafé) Chinchiná. 134 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Bustillo A. E. and Posada F. J. (1996) El uso de entomopatógenos en el control de la broca del café en Colombia. Manejo Integrado de Plagas (Costa Rica) 42, 1–13.Google Scholar
  18. Campos A. O. G. (2005) Manejo integrado de la broca del café en una finca de productión comercial en Guatemala, pp. 38–45. In Simposio sobre Situación Actual y Perspectivas de la Investigación y Manejo de la Broca del Café en Costa Rica, Cuba, Guatemala y México (edited by J. F. Barrera). Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología y El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Tapachula Chiapas.Google Scholar
  19. Central Coffee Research Institute (CCRI) (2002) Integrated management of coffee berry borer Final Report-India. CFC/ICO/02, Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Research Station, Karnataka. With contributions from CABI Commodities, UK, Cenicafé, Colombia and Jeff Bentley, Bolivia. The Commodities Press, Cali. 85 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Cisneros P. and Tandazo A. (1990) Evidencias sobre el establecimiento del parasitoide Prorops nasuta W. en el suroriente de Ecuador. Sociedad Colombiana de Entomología, Spocolen, Medellín, Miscelánea No. 18, pp. 50–57.Google Scholar
  21. Damon A. (2000) A review of the biology and control of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 90, 453–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De La Rosa W., Altorre R., Barrera J. F. and Torrello C. (2000) Effect of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae (Deuteromycetes) upon the coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) under field conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology 93, 1409–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haraprasad N., Niranjana S. R., Prakash H. S., Shetty H. S. and Wahab S. (2001) Beauveria bassiana, a potential mycopesticide for the efficient control of coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) in India. Biocontrol Science and Technology 11, 25–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Infante F., Mumford J. and Méndez I. (2001) Non-recovery of Prorops nasuta (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae), an imported parasitoid of the coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Mexico. Southwestern Entomologist 26, 159–163.Google Scholar
  25. Irulandi S., Rajendran R., Samuel S. D., Chinniah C., Kumar P. K. and Sreedharan K. (2008) Efficacy of Beauveria bassiana and an exotic parasitoid, Cephalonomia stephanoderis (Betrem) (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) for the management of coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Biological Control 22, 91–97.Google Scholar
  26. Jaramillo J., Borgemeister C. and Baker P. (2006) Coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): searching for sustainable control strategies. Bulletin of Entomological Research 96, 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jaramillo J., Chabi-Olaye A., Borgemeister C., Kamonjo C., Poehling H. M. and Vega F. (2009a) Where to sample? Ecological implications of sampling strata in determining abundance and impact of natural enemies of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei. Biological Control 49, 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jaramillo J., Chapman E. G., Vega F. E. and Harwood J. D. (2009b) Molecular diagnosis of a previously unreported predator — prey association in coffee: the impact of Karnyothrips flavipes predation on the coffee berry borer. Naturwissenschaften 97, 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jervis M. A. and Kidd N. A. C. (1986) Host feeding strategies in hymenopteran parasitoids. Biological Reviews 61, 395–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Le Pelley R. H. (1968) Pests of Coffee. Longmans, Green & Co. Ltd, London. 590 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Maldonado C. E. and Benavides P. (2007) Evaluatión del establecimiento de Cephalonomia stephanoderis y Prorops nasuta, controladores de Hypothenemus hampei, en Colombia. Cenicafé 58, 333–339.Google Scholar
  32. Portilla M. (1999) Mass rearing techniques for Cephalonomia stephanoderis (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) on Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) developed using Cenibroca artificial diet. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 25, 57–66.Google Scholar
  33. Posada F. F. J., Salazar E. H. M., Aristizábal L. F., Mejía M. C. G. and Jiménez Q. M. (2003) Taller con caficultores experimentadores para evaluar Beauveria bassiana en el control de Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Revista Colombiana de Entomología 29, 63–70.Google Scholar
  34. Saldarriaga G. (1994) Evaluatión de prácticas culturales en el control de la broca del café Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari (Coleóptero: Scolytidae). Bachelors thesis, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín. 57 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Vera J. T., Montoya E. C., Benavides P. and Gongora C. E. (2010) Evaluation of Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) as a control of the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) emerging from fallen, infested coffee berries on the ground. Biocontrol Science and Technology 21, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICIPE 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis F. Aristizábal
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hugo M. Salazar
    • 2
  • Carlos G. Mejía
    • 1
  • Mauricio Jiménez
    • 1
  • Alex E. Bustillo
    • 3
  • Steven P. Arthurs
    • 4
  1. 1.Centro Nacional de Investigaciones de CaféManizalesColombia
  2. 2.Comité Departamental de Cafeteros de CaldasManizalesColombia
  3. 3.Cenicaña, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones en Caña de AzúcarCaliColombia
  4. 4.Mid-Florida Research and Education CenterUniversity of Florida/IFASApopkaUSA

Personalised recommendations