International Journal of Tropical Insect Science

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 249–261 | Cite as

Breeding chickpea (Cicer arietinum [Fabaceae]) for better seed quality inadvertently increased susceptibility to adzuki bean beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis [Coleoptera: Bruchidae])

  • Gemechu KeneniEmail author
  • Endashaw Bekele
  • Muhammad Imtiaz
  • Emana Getu
  • Kifle Dagne
  • Fassil Assefa


Continuous breeding efforts in Ethiopia resulted in the release of 15 improved chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties with improved yield, seed quality, disease resistance and better adaptation to different production zones within Ethiopia. This study was conducted to examine whether breeding for increased yield and other important agronomic traits without direct selection for resistance to the adzuki bean beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.) has inadvertently resulted in a significant level of susceptibility to this seed pest within the new cultivars. Field and laboratory studies were conducted to see whether breeding for better seed quality has increased susceptibility to infestation by the adzuki bean beetle. Seeds of 130 accessions/genotypes were infested with the beetle in 2009 under ambient temperature and relative humidity at Holetta, Ambo and Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. Data were recorded on attributes of infestation level and seed damage. Data on seed size, proportion of seed coat and grain yield were collected from a replicated field trial conducted with the same accessions/genotypes grown under the same conditions in 2009/10 at Ginchi and Ambo, Ethiopia. Differences among the genotypes were significant for most traits with the exception of the number of uninfested seeds. Accessions with partial resistance include 41320, 41289, 41291, 41134, 41315, 207658, 41103, 41168, 41142, 41174, 41029, 41207, 209087, 231327, 41161 and 41008. The improved varieties were more susceptible than germplasm accessions. The results indicate that genetic progress was achieved both in grain yield and seed size, but breeding efforts for these traits had also inadvertently increased seed susceptibility to C. chinensis. Improvements in seed size resulted in higher infestation levels and seed damage. Future breeding to improve seed quality should simultaneously consider corrective measures to incorporate resistance to the adzuki bean beetle.

Key words

adzuki bean beetle breeding progress Callosobruchus chinensis chickpea Cicer arietinum Ethiopia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acosta-Gallegos J. A., Kelly J. D. and Gepts P. (2008) Prebreeding in common bean and use of genetic diversity from wild germplasm. Crop Science 48, 3–16.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed K., Khalique F., Afzal M., Tahir M. and Malik B. A. (1989) Variability in chickpea (C. arietinum L.) genotypes for resistance to Callosobruchus maculates F. (Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 25, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alemayehu M. (2005) Post harvest losses in chickpea caused by bruchids and management of Callosobruchus chinensis using botanicals in Enemay Woreda. MSc thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  4. Ali K. and Habtewold T. (1994) Research on insect pests of cool-season food legumes, pp. 367–396. In Cool-Season Food Legumes of Ethiopia. Proceedings of the First National Cool-Season Food Legumes Review Conference, 16–20 December 1993, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. ICARDA/IAR. ICARDA, Syria.Google Scholar
  5. Aslam M., Shaheen F. A., Abbas M. A. and Saba A. (2006) Management of Callosobruchus chinensis Linnaeus through use of resistance in stored chickpea varieties. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2, 82–84.Google Scholar
  6. Bejiga G. and van der Maesen L. J. G. (2006) Cicer arietinum L., pp. 42–46. In Plant Resources of Tropical Africa 1: Cereals and Pulses. PROTA Foundation, Wageningen, Netherlands/Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, Netherlands/CTA, Wageningen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  7. Bekele E. (1985) The biology of cereal landrace population I. Problems of gene conservation, plant breeding selection schemes and sample size requirement. Hereditas 103, 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bezawuletaw K. (1999) Genetic gain in grain yield potential and associated agronomic traits in Ethiopian haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgarus L) varieties. MSc thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  9. Central Statistics Agency/CSA (2009) Agricultural Sample Survey 2008/2009 (2001 E.C.), Volume I: Area and Production of Crops, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  10. Chen H. M., Liv C. A., Kuo C. G., Chien C. M., Sun H. C., Huang C. C., Lin Y. C. and Ku H. M. (2007) Development of molecular marker for a bruchid (Callosobruchus chinensis) resistance gene in mungbean. Euphytica 157, 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox T. S., Ben-Huli L. S., Stears R. G. and Martin T. J. (1988) Genetic improvement in agronomic traits of hard red winter wheat cultivars from 1919 to 1987. Crop Science 28, 756–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cubero J. I. (1987) Morphology of chickpea, pp. 35–66. In The Chickpea. C.A.B. International, Wallingford, Oxon.Google Scholar
  13. Damte T. and Dawd M. (2006) Chickpea, lentil and grass pea insect pest research in Ethiopia: a review, pp. 260–273. In Food and Forage Legumes of Ethiopia: Progress and Prospects. Proceedings of a Workshop on Food and Forage Legumes, 22–26 September 2003, Addis, Ababa, Ethiopia. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.Google Scholar
  14. Desroches P., Elshazly E., Mandon N., Duc G. and Huignard J. (1995) Development of Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) and C. maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) L. in seeds of Vicia f aba differing in tannin, convicine and vicine contents. Journal of Stored Products Research 31, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. EARO (Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization) (2000) National Crop Research Strategy. Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization (EARO), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 52 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Egli D. B. (2008) Soybean yield trends from 1972–2003 in mid-western USA. Field Crops Research 106, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Falconer D. S. (1989) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edn. Longman, London.Google Scholar
  18. Fekadu W. (2010) Assessment of genetic improvement in grain yield potential, malting quality and associated traits of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in Ethiopia. MSc thesis, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  19. Gomez K. A. and Gomez A. (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  20. IBPGR, ICRISAT and ICARDA (1993) Descriptor for Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). IBPGR, Rome Italy/ICRISAT, Patancheru, India/ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.Google Scholar
  21. Jarso M., Keneni G. and Wolabu T. (2011) Enhancing the technical relevance of pulses and oilseed crops through target oriented breeding, pp. 45–65. In Oilseeds: Engine for economic development. Proceedings of the Second National Oilseeds Workshop, 24–26 March 2010, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  22. Kassie M., Shiferaw B., Asfaw S., Abate T., Muricho G., Ferede S., Eshete M. and Assefa K. (2009) Current situation and future outlooks of the chickpea sub-sector in Ethiopia. ICRISAT and EIAR Scholar
  23. Keneni G. and Simane B. (2003) Implications of geographic origin and botanical sub-species for parental selection in genetic enhancement of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Genetics and Breeding 57, 93–100.Google Scholar
  24. Keneni G. and Wakjira A. (2004) Genetic uniformity of crop cultivars: challenges and opportunities, pp. 1–9. In SEBIL. Vol. 10. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Crop Science Society of Ethiopia. 19–21 June 2001, EARO, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  25. Keneni G., Bekele E., Getu E., Imtiaz M., Dagne K. and Asefa F. (2011) Characterization of Ethiopian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm accessions for response to infestation by Adzuki bean beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.). I. Performance evaluation. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 21 (1&2), 41–65.Google Scholar
  26. Keneni G., Jarso M. and Asmamaw B. (2002) The role of drainage and genotype in improving productivity of faba bean on waterlogged Vertisols. Ethiopian Journal of Natural Resources 4, 49–60.Google Scholar
  27. Lale N. E. S. and Kolo A. A. (1998) Susceptibility of eight genetically improved local cultivars of cowpea to Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in Nigeria. International Journal of Pest Management 44, 25–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lemma L. (1990) The biology and control of the adzuki been beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.) on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). MSc thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  29. Lirie E. (2010) Genetic gain and genotype x environment interaction in grain yield, oil content and associated traits of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) in Ethiopia. MSc thesis, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  30. Little T. M. and Hills F. J. (1978) Agricultural Experimentation: Design and Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 350 pp.Google Scholar
  31. MoARD/Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (2009) CROP Variety Register. Issue No. 12. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  32. Muehlbauer F. J. and Tullu A. (1997) Cicer arietinum L. NewCROP FactSHEET: Scholar
  33. Pacheco I. A., Bolonhezi S., Sartori M. R., Turatti J. M., Paula D. C. and de Lourencao A. L. (1994) Resistance to bruchids, fatty acid composition and grain texture in genotypes of chickpea. Bragantia 53, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rubenstein D. K., Heisey P., Shoemaker R., Sullivan J. and Frisvold G. (2005) Crop genetic resources: An economic appraisal. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Economic Information Bulletin No. 2, Scholar
  35. SAS Institute (1996) SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, version 6.12 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC.Google Scholar
  36. Shaheen F. A., Khaliq A. and Aslam M. (2006) Resistance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars against pulse beetle. Pakistan Journal of Botany 38, 1237–1244.Google Scholar
  37. Singh K. B. (1987) Chickpea breeding, pp. 127–162. In M. C. Saxena and K. B. Singh (eds), The Chickpea. C.A.B. International, Wallingford, Oxon.Google Scholar
  38. Somta P., Ammaranan C., Ooi P. A. C. and Srinives P. (2007) Inheritance of seed resistance of bruchids in cultivated mungbean (Vigna radiate L. Wilezek). Euphytica 155, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tarekegn A. (1994) Yield potential of rainfed wheat in the central highlands of Ethiopia. MSc thesis, Alemaya University of Agriculture, Alemaya, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  40. Teklu Y. (1998) Genetic gain in grain yield potential and associated agronomic traits of tef (Eragrosis tef [Zucc.] Trotter). MSc thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  41. Temesgen T. (2008) Genetic gain and morpho-agronomic basis of genetic improvement in grain yield potential achieved by faba bean (Vicia faba L.) breeding in Ethiopia. MSc thesis, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  42. Upadhyaya H. D., Furman B. J., Dwivedi S. L., Udupa S. M., Gowda S. L. L., Baum M., Crouch J. H., Buhariwalla H. K. and Singh S. (2006) Development of a composite collection for mining germplasm possessing allelic variation for beneficial traits in chickpea. Plant Genetic Resources 4, 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ustun A., Allen F. L. and English B. C. (2001) Genetic progress in soybean of the U.S. Midsouth. Crop Science 41, 993–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Waddington S. R., Ransom S. R., Osamanzi M. and Sounders D. A. (1986) Improvement in the yield potential of bread wheat adapted to North West Mexico. Crop Science 26, 699–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams P. C. and Singh U. (1987) Nutritional quality and the evaluation of quality in breeding programs, pp. 329–356. In M. C. Saxena and K. B. Singh (eds), The Chickpea. C.A.B. International, Wallingford, Oxon.Google Scholar
  46. Winter P., Staginnus C., Huettel B., Jungmann R., Pfaff T., Benko-Iseppon A.-M., Rakshit S., Pinkert S., Baum M. and Kahl G. (2004) Architecture and maps of the chickpea genome: a basis for understanding plant-rhizobium interactions, pp. 201–222. In Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation: Prospects for Enhanced Application in Tropical Agriculture. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  47. Worku M. and Zelleke H. (2007) Advances in improving harvest index and grain yield of maize in Ethiopia. East African Journal of Sciences 1, 112–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yadav S. S., Kumar J., Yadav S. K, Singh S., Yadav V. S., Turner N. C. and Redden R. (2006) Evaluation of Helicoverpa and drought resistance in Desi and Kabuli chickpea. Plant Genetic Resources 4, 198–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICIPE 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gemechu Keneni
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Endashaw Bekele
    • 2
  • Muhammad Imtiaz
    • 3
  • Emana Getu
    • 2
  • Kifle Dagne
    • 2
  • Fassil Assefa
    • 2
  1. 1.Holetta Agricultural Research CenterAddis AbabaEthiopia
  2. 2.College of Natural SciencesAddis Ababa UniversityAddis AbabaEthiopia
  3. 3.International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)AleppoSyria

Personalised recommendations