Semiochemicals produced by tomato varieties and their role in parasitism of Corcyra cephalonica (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) by the egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)

  • A. V. N. Paul
  • Madhulika Srivastava
  • Prem Dureja
  • A. K. SinghEmail author


Hexane extracts of 10 different varieties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) obtained in the vegetative and flowering periods were studied for synomonal response of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis Ishii. Gas chromatography of leaf extracts revealed the presence of saturated hydrocarbons ranging from C14 to C29 in varying numbers and concentrations. These hydrocarbons elicited varied synomonal responses from the parasitoid. The quantity of individual hydrocarbons varied from 72 to 34,940 ppm in the vegetative period and from 4 to 46,170 ppm in the flowering period. Hexane extracts obtained during the flowering period showed a greater synomonal response compared with those obtained during the vegetative period. A better response observed for certain varieties of tomato at a particular period could be due to the presence of higher concentrations of favourable hydrocarbons relative to unfavourable ones. Synomonal activity seems to be associated mainly with tricosane, heneicosane, pentacosane and hexacosane during the vegetative period and with heneicosane and hexacosane during the flowering period. In the vegetative period, the tomato variety To-Pant-T4 elicited the highest activity as well as parasitism at the lowest concentration of 25,000 ppm, which was higher than other varieties at all concentrations. Varieties To-BT-116-32, To-BT-20-2-1 and To-Pant-T3 in the vegetative period and To-Selection-15, To-Selection-32 and To-BT-22-2-1 in the flowering period elicited higher responses than the other varieties. To-BT-20-2-1 elicited a maximum response in the flowering period, which may be due to the presence of higher relative quantities of tricosane, heneicosane and hexacosane. In view of these findings, tomato varieties with favourable semiochemicals could be exploited in an integrated pest management programme to enhance the effectiveness of the egg parasitoid T. chilonis against the fruit borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hb).

Key words

tomato synomone Trichogramma chilonis Corcyra cephalonica 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altieri M. A., Annamalai S., Katiyar K. P. and Flath R. A. (1982) Effect of plant extracts on the rate of parasitisation of Anagasta kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) eggs by Trichogramma pretiosum (Hyme-noptera: Trichogrammatidae) under green house conditions. Entomophaga 27, 431–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Annadurai R. S., Murugesan S., Senrayan R., Gurusubramanian G. and Ananthakrishnan T. N. (1992) Tritrophic interactions in Heliothis armigera Hübner (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) and its natural enemy systems: a chemical ecological approach, pp. 83–101. In Emerging Trends in Biological Control of Phytophagous Insects (Edited by T. N. Ananthakrishnan). Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, India. 255 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Dicke M., Sabelis M. W., Takabayashi J., Barun J. and Posthumus M. A. (1990) Plant strategies of manipulating predator-prey interactions through allelo-chemicals: prospects for application in pest control. Journal of Chemical Ecology 16, 3091–3118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gomez K. A. and Gomez A. A. (1986) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 657 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Hendry L. B., Wichmann J. K., Hindenlang D. M., Weaver K. M. and Korzeniowski S. H. (1976) Plants-The origin of kairomones utilized by parasitoids of phytophagous insects. Journal of Chemical Ecology 1, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kashyap R. K., Kennedy G. G. and Farrar R. R. (1991) Behavioral response of Trichogramma pretiosum Riley and Telenomus sphingis (Ashmead) to trichome/methyl ketone mediated resistance in tomato. Journal of Chemical Ecology 17, 543–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. King E. G., Hopper K. R. and Powell J. E. (1985) Biological control in agricultural IPM systems, pp. 201–227. In Analysis of Systems for Biological Control of Arthropod Pests in the USA by Augmentation of Predators and Parasites (Edited by M. A. Hoy and D. C. Herzog). Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
  8. Mani M., Krishnamoorthy A., Gopalakrishnan C. and Rabindra R. J. (2001) Augmentative biocontrol within vegetable IPM - Indian Scenario, pp. 119–140. In Augmentative Biocontrol, Proceedings of the ICAR-CABI Workshop. 29 June-1 July 2000, Project Directorate of Biological Control, Bangalore (Edited by S. P. Singh, S. T. Murphy and C. R. Ballal). CABI Bioscience, UK. 250 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Nagarkatti S. and Nagaraja H. (1979) The status of Trichogramma chilonis Ishii (Hymenoptera: Tricho-grammatidae). Oriental Insects 13, 115–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nordlund D. A., Chalfant R. B. and Lewis W. J. (1985a) Response of Trichogramma pretiosum females to volatile synomones from tomato plants. Journal of Entomological Science 20, 372–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nordlund D. A., Chalfant R. B. and Lewis W. J. (1985b) Response of Trichogramma pretiosum females to extracts of two plants attacked by Heliothis zea. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 12, 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Padmavathi C. and Paul A. V. N. (1998) Saturated hydrocarbons as kairomonal source for the egg parasitoid, Trichogramma chilonis Ishii (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 122, 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Paul A. V. N., Singh S. and Singh A. K. (2002) Kairomonal effect of some saturated hydrocarbons on the egg parasitoids, Trichogramma brasiliensis (Ashmead) and Trichogramma exiguum Pinto & Platner (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 126, 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Paul A. V. N. and Sreekumar K. M. (1998) Improved technology for mass rearing of trichogrammatids and their factitious host Corcyra cephalonica, pp. 99–111. In Technology in Biological Control (Edited by T. N. Ananthakrishnan). Oxford and IBH Pub. Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.Google Scholar
  15. Picard F. and Rabaud E. (1914) External parasitism in the family Braconidae. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of France 8, 266–269.Google Scholar
  16. Powell W. (1991) Tritrophic influence on aphid parasitoids (Hym., Braconidae: Aphidiinae). Redia 74, 3; Appendix 129–133.Google Scholar
  17. Smith S. M. (1996) Biological control with Trichogramma: advances, successes, and their potential use. Annual Review of Entomology 41, 375–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. van Emden H. E (1986) The interaction of plant resistance and natural enemies: effects on populations of sucking insects, pp. 138–150. In Interactions of Plant Resistance and Parasitoids and Predators of Insects (Edited by D. J. Boethel and R. D. Eikenbary). Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Vinson S. B. (1976) Host selection by insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology 21, 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vinson S. B. (1991) Chemical signals used by parasitoids. Redia 74, 15–42.Google Scholar
  21. Wajnberg E. and Hassan S. A. (Eds) (1994) Biological Control with Egg Parasitoids. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. 286 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICIPE 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. N. Paul
    • 1
  • Madhulika Srivastava
    • 1
  • Prem Dureja
    • 2
  • A. K. Singh
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of EntomologyIARINew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Division of Agricultural ChemicalsIARINew DelhiIndia
  3. 3.Department of ZoologyUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations