The Glossina proteolytic lectin (Gpl) gene is expressed only in members of Glossina species
Differentiation of bloodstream-form trypanosomes into procyclics in tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) is a crucial step in the establishment of midgut infections. A number of factors have been implicated in the transformation process, including enzymes and lectins or lectin-like molecules. Recently, Glossina proteolytic lectin (Gpl) gene, which encodes a protein with both lectin and trypsin activities has been shown to stimulate transformation of bloodstream-form trypanosomes into procyclics in vitro. Using RT-PCR, we show that the induction of Gpl gene expression by blood meal occurs only in Glossina fuscipes fuscipes Newstead, Glossina austeni Newstead, Glossina pallidipes Austen, and not in the Anopheles gambiae Giles sensu stricto, Phlebotomus duboscqi Neveu-Lemaire, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus Neumann and Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus). The expression means of Gpl mRNA in G. f. fuscipes following a blood meal were significant (P < 0.05) with low expression in teneral flies and reaching a maximum between 48 and 72h (P < 0.05), suggesting time-dependent regulation of the transcription. The expression of the Gpl gene was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in G. f. fuscipes fed on blood meal infected with Trypanosoma brucei brucei as compared with G. f. fuscipes fed on uninfected blood meal. This suggests some form of interaction of T. b. brucei or the parasite products with Gpl within the tsetse midgut leading to down-regulation of the Gpl gene. Additionally, refractory G. f. fuscipes expressed higher (P < 0.05) transcript abundance than the susceptible G. pallidipes.
Key wordsGlossina proteolytic lectin gene midgut bloodmeal Glossina species trypanosome
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abubakar L. U., Zimba G., Wells C., Mulaa F. and Osir E. O. (2003) Evidence for the involvement of a tsetse midgut lectin-trypsin complex in differentiation of bloodstream-form trypanosomes. Insect Science and Its Application 23, 197–205.Google Scholar
- Acosta-Serrano A., Vassella E., Liniger M., Renggli C. K., Brun R., Roditi I. and Englund P. T. (2001) The surface coat of procyclic Trypanosoma brucei: Programmed expression and proteolytic cleavage of procyclin in the tsetse fly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 1513–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hao Z., Kasumba I., Lehane M. J., Gibson W. C, Kwon J. and Aksoy S. (2001) Tsetse immune responses and trypanosome transmission: Implications for the development of tsetse-based strategies to reduce trypanosomiasis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 12648–12653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ibrahim E. A. R., Ingram G. A. and Moulyneux D. H. (1984) Haemagglutinins and parasite agglutinins in haemolymph and gut of Glossina. Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 35, 151–156.Google Scholar
- Kephart D. (1998) Quantitative RT-PCR: Rapid construction of templates for competitive amplification. Promega Notes 68, 6–7.Google Scholar
- Kongoro J. A., Osir E. O., Imbuga M. O. and Oguge N. O. (2002) Comparison of midgut trypsin/lectin activities and trypanosome infection rates in three Glossina species. Insect Science and Its Application 22, 295–301.Google Scholar
- Lehane M. J., Aksoy S., Gibson W., Kerhornou A., Berriman M., Halmiton J., Soares M. B., Bonaldo M. F., Lehane S. and Hall N. (2003) Adult midgut expressed sequence tags from the midgut of tsetse fly Glossina morsitans morsitans and expression analysis of putative immune response genes. Genome Biology 4, R63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- SAS (1999) SAS/STAT Software. Changes and Enhancement through Release 8.02. Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
- Van den Abbelle J. and Decleir W. (1992) Study of the vectorial capacity of Glossina sp. related to its digestive physiology and rearing conditions, tsetse control diagnosis and chemotherapy using nuclear techniques, IAEA-TECDOC-634. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna.Google Scholar