Managing Termites in Maize with the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae

  • N. K. ManianiaEmail author
  • S. Ekesi
  • J. M. Songa
Research Article


Field experiments were conducted for two seasons to assess the efficacy of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae in the control of termites in maize. Application of the fungus at planting was found to significantly reduce maize lodging and increase grain yield in both seasons. However, data from treatment application at tasselling were not consistent. Our results suggest that a granular formulation of M. anisopliae might be a useful option for the management of termites in the maize agroecosystem.

Key Words

termites maize fungal biopesticide Metarhizium anisopliae 


Des expérimentations en plein champs ont été conduites durant deux saisons afin d’évaluer l’efficacité du champignon entomopathogène Metarhizium anisopliae pour la lutte contre les termites sur les cultures de maïs. L’application du champignon au moment de la semis s’est révélée très efficace en réduisant la chute des plants de maïs d’une part, et en augmentant le rendement en grains d’autre part, pendant les deux saisons. Cependant, les résultats issus des traitements pendant l’inflorescence des plants de maïs n’étaient pas consistants. Nos résultats suggèrent donc que la formulation du champignon M. anisopliae en granules serait une option appropriée pour le contrôle des termites dans les cultures de maïs.

Mots Clés

termites maïs biopesticide fongique Metarhizium anisopliae 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abdulrahman A. (1990) Foraging activity and control of termites in western Ethiopia, PhD thesis, University of London, 277 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Booth S. R., Tanigoshi L. and Dewes I. (2000) Potential of a dried mycelium formulation of an indigenous strain of Metarhizium anisopliae against subterranean pests of cranberry. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 10, 659–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cowie R. H. and Wood T. G. (1989) Damage to crops, forestry and range-land by fungus-growing termites (Termitidae: Macrotermitinae) in Ethiopia. Sociobiology 15, 139–153.Google Scholar
  4. Dent D. (1999) Green Muscle® registered in South Africa. Biol. News Inf. 20, 9N.Google Scholar
  5. EcoScience (1997) Bio-Blast™ biological termiticide. Scholar
  6. Fernandes P.M. and Alves S.B. (1991) Control of Cornitermes cumulans (Kollar 1832) (Isoptera: Termitidae) with Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. and Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorok. under field conditions. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Brazil 20, 45–50.Google Scholar
  7. Gethi M., Gitonga W. and Ochiel G. R. S. (1995) Termite damage and control options in eastern Kenya. In Proceedings of 2ndRegional Workshop on Termite Research and Control, 7–9 March 1995, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  8. Gitonga W. (1992) Termicidal screening and assessment of termite damage in agriculture and forestry in Kenya. In Proceedings 1st Regional Workshop on Termite Research and Control, 17–19 August 1990, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  9. Gitonga W. (1996) Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin and Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin as potential biological control agents of Macrotermes michaelseni (Sjostedt) (Isoptera: Termitidae) in Kenya. PhD thesis. Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  10. ICIPE (1997) Annual Scientific Report, 1995–1997, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  11. Ko W. H., Fuji J. K. and Kanegawa K. M. (1982) The nature of soil pernicious to Coptotermes formosanus. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 39, 38–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Krueger S. R., Villani M. G., Martins A. S. and Roberts D. W. (1992) Efficacy of soil application of Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorokin conidia, and standard and lyophilized mycelial particles against scarab grubs. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 59, 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Logan J. W. M., Cowie R. H. and Wood T. G. (1990) Termite (Isoptera) control in agriculture and forestry by nonchemical methods: A review. Bull. Entomol. Res. 80, 309–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Milner R. J. and Staples J. A. (1996) Biological control of termites—results and experiences within a CSIRO project in Australia. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 6, 3–9.Google Scholar
  15. Nkunika O. Y. P. (1999) Potential use of entomopathogenic fungi for the control of termites in cassava fields, pp. 263–268. In Proceedings of the First Scientific Workshop of the Southern African Root Crops Research Network (SARRNET) (Edited by M. O. Akoroda and J. M. Teri), Zambia.Google Scholar
  16. Ochiel G. R. S., Gitonga W. and Kusewa T. M. (1995) Comparison of chemical and cultural treatments against termites (Isoptera: Termitidae) in western Kenya. In Proceedings, 2nd Regional Workshop on Termite Research and Control, 7–9 March 1995, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  17. Polaszek A. (Ed.) (1998) African Cereal Stem Borers: Economic Importance, Taxonomy, Natural Enemies and Control. CAB International, Oxon, 530 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Prior C. (1988) Biological pesticides for low external-input agriculture. Biol. News Info. 10, 17–22.Google Scholar
  19. Rath A. C. (2000) The use of entomopathogenic fungi for termite control. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 10, 563–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sands W. A. (1977) The role of termites in tropical agriculture. Outlook Agric. 9, 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. SAS Institute (1990) SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6, 4th Edition, Vol. 2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  22. Sekamatte M. B. (2000) Options for integrated management of termites (Isoptera: Termitidae) in smallholder maize-based cropping systems in Uganda. PhD thesis submitted to Makerere University, Uganda.Google Scholar
  23. Umeh V. C. and Ivbijaro M. F. (1997) Termite abundance and damage in traditional maize-cassava intercrops in southwestern Nigeria. Insect Sri. Applic. 17, 315–321.Google Scholar
  24. United Nations (1987) Consolidated List of Products Where Consumption and/or Sale Have Been Banned, Withdrawn, Severely Restricted or Not Approved by Governments. New York, United Nations (United Nations Publ. ST/ESA/192).Google Scholar
  25. Wightman J. A. (1991) Soil insect problem in African groundnut crops, pp. 171–176. In Advances in Management and Conservation of Soil Fauna (Edited by G.K. Veeresh, D. Rajagopal and C.A. Viraktamath). Oxford/IBH Publ., New Delhi.Google Scholar
  26. Wood T. G. (1986) Report on a visit to Ethiopia to advise on assessment of termite damage to crops. Report R1347 (R). ODNRI, London.Google Scholar
  27. Wood T. G., Bednarzik M. and Aden H. (1987) Damage to crops by Microtermes najdensis (Isoptera, Macrotermitinae) in irrigated semi-desert areas of the Red Sea coast. 1. The Tihama region of the Yemen Arab Republic. Trop. Pest Manage. 33, 142–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wood T. G., Johnson R. A. and Ohiagu C. E. (1980) Termite damage and crop loss studies in Nigeria—A review of termite damage to maize and estimation of damage, loss of yield and Microtermes abundance at Mokwa. Trop. Pest Manage. 26, 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICIPE 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE)NairobiKenya
  2. 2.Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI)MachakosKenya

Personalised recommendations