Advertisement

International Journal of Tropical Insect Science

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 325–330 | Cite as

Eggshell Fine Structure of Amata passalis F. (Lepidoptera: Amatidae), A Pest of Mulberry

  • Vineet KumarEmail author
  • S. Rajadurai
  • A. M. Babu
  • B. K. Kariappa
Research Article

Abstract

—The eggshell fine structure of a lepidopteran pest of mulberry, Amata passalis F. (Lepidoptera: Amatidae), was investigated using scanning electron microscopy. The micropylar rosette around the micropyle, shell imprints, aeropyles and regional differentiation were studied. The surface of the amatid eggshell had a highly decorated chorion with structural difference at the anterior and posterior poles. The micropylar structure was at the anterior pole of the spherical eggs (488 ± 0.595 mm in diameter), opposite to its side of attachment to the substratum. The micropylar rosette measured 51.20 ± 0.52 mm in diameter and was formed of 15–19 petal-shaped primary cells. The micropylar opening into the micropylar canal was 3.76 ± 0.52 mm in diameter. The entire surface of the chorion had a reticulate pattern of pentagonal and hexagonal cells, each of which was boarded by 3 to 6 aeropyles of similar size (0.36 ± 0.008 mm in diameter).

Keys Words

Amata passalis fine structure eggshell micropylar rosette SEM 

Résumé

—La structure fine du chorion de l’oeuf du lépidoptère ravageur de la mûre, Amata passalis F. (Lepidoptera: Amatidae), a été étudiée en microscopie électronique à balayage. La rosette micropylaire autour du micropyle, les structures de surface, les aéropyles et les différentiations régionales ont été étudiées. La surface du chorion de l’oeuf est très décorée avec une différence structurale aux pôles antérieur et postérieur. La structure micropylaire est située au pôle antérieur de l’oeuf sphérique (488 ± 0,595 mm de diamètre), à l’opposé de son point de fixation sur le substrat. La rosette micropylaire mesure 51,20 ± 0,52 mm et est formée de 15–19 cellules primaires en forme de pétale. L’ouverture micropylaire dans le canal micropylaire a un diamètre de 3,76 ± 0,52 mm. Toute la surface du chorion présente un dessin réticulé de cellules pentagonales et hexagonales, chacune d’entre elles est bordée par 3 à 6 aéropyles de taille identique (0,36 ± 0,008 mm de diamètre).

Mots Clés

Amata passalis structure fine chorion rosette mycropylaire MET 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arbogast R. T., Brower J. H. and Strong R. G. (1989) External morphology of the eggs of Teinea pallescentella, Tinea occidentella Chambers, and Niditineafuscella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tineidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 18, 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beament J. W. L. (1948) The penetration of insect eggshell. I. Penetration of the chorion of Rhodnius prolixus Stál. Bull Entomol. Res. 39, 359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Downey J. C. and Allyn A. C. (1981) Eggs of Riodinidae. J. Lepid. Soc. 34, 135–145.Google Scholar
  4. Fehrenbach H. (1989) Fine structure of the eggshell of four primitive moths: Hepialus hecta (L.), Wiseana umbraculata (Guenea) (Hepialidae), Mnesarchaea fusilella Walker and M. acuta Philp. (Mnesarchaeidae) (Lepidoptera, Exoporia). Int. J. Insect Morphol Embryol. 18, 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fehrenbach H., Dittrich V. and Zissler D. (1987) Eggshell fine structure of three lepidopteran pests: Cydia pomonella (L.) (Tortricidae), Heliothis virescens (Fabr.) and Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Noctuidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol 16, 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hill L. (1982) Eggs of some Tasmanian Noctuidae (Lepidoptera). Aust. Entomol. Mag. 9, 49–59.Google Scholar
  7. Hinton H. E. (1981) Biology of Insect Eggs. Pergamon Press, Oxford. 1125 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Korschelt E. (1887) Zur Bildung der Eihullen, der Mikropyle und Chorionanhånge bei den Insekten. Nova Acta Ksl. Leop. Carol Dtsch. Akad. Naturforsch. 51, 185–252.Google Scholar
  9. Kumar V., Babu A. M., Kariappa B. K., Jayaswal K. P., Katiyar R. L. and Datta R. K. (1999) Surface ultrastructure of the egg chorion of Spilarctia obliqua Walker (Lepidoptera Arctiidae). Redia 82, 137–143.Google Scholar
  10. Leuckart R. (1855) Ueber die mikropyle und den feineren Bau der Schalenhaut bei den Insekteneiern. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Lehre von der Befruchtung. Arch. Anat. Physiol. Wiss, Mediein. Pp. 90–264.Google Scholar
  11. Matheny E. L. and Heinrichs E. A. (1972) Chorion characteristics of sod webworm eggs. Ann. Entomol Soc. Amer. 65, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Margaritis L. H. (1985) Structure and physiology of the eggshelll, pp. 153–230. In Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology (Edited by G. A. Kerkut and L. I. Gilbert). Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Mazzini M. (1974) Sulla fine struttura del micropila negli insetti. Redia 55, 343–372.Google Scholar
  14. Muller K. (1938) Histologische Untersuchungen uber den entwicklungsbeginn bei einem kleinschmetterlung (Plodia interpunctella). Z. Wiss. Zool 151, 192–242.Google Scholar
  15. Salkeld E. H. (1983) A catalogue of the eggs of some Canadian Geometridae (Lepidoptera), with comments. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 126, 3–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wigglesworth V. B. and Beament J. W. L. (1950) The respiratory mechanisms of some insect eggs. Q. J. Micros. Sci. 91, 429–452.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICIPE 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vineet Kumar
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Rajadurai
    • 1
  • A. M. Babu
    • 1
  • B. K. Kariappa
    • 1
  1. 1.Electron Microscopy UnitCentral Sericultural Research and Training InstituteMysoreIndia

Personalised recommendations