Advertisement

International Journal of Tropical Insect Science

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 855–859 | Cite as

Faba Bean (Vicia Faba L.) Seed Coat Colour, Tannin Content and Susceptibility to Bruchids

  • M. E. Hassan Shazali
Research Article

Abstract

Five mutants for seed coat colour from the faba bean, Vicia faba L. variety BF 2/ 2 (Beladi) were tested qualitatively and quantitatively for tannin content. The susceptibility of the mutants to Bruchidius incarnatus (Boh.) and Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) was also evaluated. All seed coats contained tannins (0.75–3.75%). The darker the colour the lower the tannin content. Cotyledons with testas removed were devoid of tannins. The thickness of the seed coats ranged from 0.146–0.155 mm, however, differences among mutants were not significant. Faba seeds were more suitable for the multiplication of B. incarnatus than C. maculatus. The poor performance of the latter was manifested as low fecundity, high mortality and longer developmental period. It was concluded that selection for white coloured faba seeds should not be discouraged on the basis of its assumed susceptibility to bruchids.

Key Words

Vicia faba (L.) seed coat tannins Bruchidius incarnatus (Boh.) Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) damage 

Résumé

Cinq variétés de pericarpes de féve, Vicia Faba L. BF 2/2 (Beladi) ont subi des examens tant sur le plant qualitatif que quantitatif pour mesurer leur teneur tannique. La susceptibilité des varietés, Bruchidius incarnatus (Boh.) et Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) est également evaluée. Tous les péricarpes contiennent du tannin. Plus le pericarpe est sombre, moins est sa teneur en tannin. Les varietés Detested Cotyledons sont privé du tannin. Le diamétre des pericarpes varie de 0.146 à 0.155 mm, quoique les différences entre les varietés ne sont pas signifiantes. Les graines Faba conviennent pour la multiplication de B. incarnatus mieux que pour le C. maculatus. La maigre performance de ce dernier revient à sa médiocre fecondité, un taux important de mortalité et une période plus longue de maturité pour les graines Faba. Toutefois le devéloppement de ces deux insectes n’est pas louché par Lacouleur du péricarpe on sa teneur en tannin. En conclusion, il est recommandé de ne pas décourager l’option Faba (blanc) sous le prétexte de sa susceptibilité aux bruchidis.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abo-Hegazi A. M. T., Nassib A. M. and Ahmed M. Y. (1978) The association between seed coat colour and brightness of field beans (Vicia faba L.) and resistance to legume beetle. In Proceedings of 4th Con. Pest Control NRC Cairo. pp. 768–778.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed A. E. (1985) Sorghum grain tannin content and its effect on performance of growing chicks. M.Sc. thesis, University of Khartoum.Google Scholar
  3. Blessin C. E., Van Steen C. H. and Dimlar R. J. (1963) An examination of anthocyanogens in grain sorghum. Cereal Chem. 40, 241–250.Google Scholar
  4. Bond D. A. (1976) In vitro digestibility of some faba bean cultivars. Can. J. Plant Sci. 54, 413–421.Google Scholar
  5. Booker R. H. (1967) Observations on three bruchids associated with cowpea in Northern Nigeria. J. Stored Prod. Res. 3, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns R. E. (1971) Method for estimation of tannin in sorghum grain. Agron. J. 63, 511–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabrera A. and Martin A. (1968) Variation in tannin content in Vicia faba (L.). J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 106, 377–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chowdhury K. A. and Buth G. M. (1970) Seed coat structure and anatomy of Indian pulses. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 63, 169–179.Google Scholar
  9. Gorski M., Mieczylaw K. and Jan B. (1985) Variation in tannin content of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) seed coats. FABIS 11, 26–28.Google Scholar
  10. Griffiths D. W. (1983) Some anti-nutritive factors in Vicia faba L. FABIS 6, 1–3.Google Scholar
  11. Griffiths D. W. (1984) An assessment of the potential for improving the nutritive value of field beans Vicia faba: Progress report. In Vicia faba: Agronomy, Physiology and Breeding (Edited by Hebblethwaite P. D.), pp. 271–278. The Hague-Boston-Lancaster. Martin Nijhoff/Junk.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffiths D. W. and Jones D. J. H. (1977) Cellulose inhibition by tannins in the testa of field beans Vicia faba. J. Sci. Food Agric. 28, 983–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marquardt R. R., Ward A. T., Campbell L. D. and Cansfield P. E. (1977) Purification, identification and characterization of a growth inhibitor in faba beans (Vicia faba L. var. minor). J. Nutr. 107, 1313–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marquardt R. R., Mackirdy J. A. and Ward A. T. (1978) Comparative cell wall constituent level of tannin-free and tannin containing cultivars of faba beans (Vicia faba L.). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 58, 775–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Papadopoulos C. H., Tsaflaris A. S. and Roupakias D. G. (1985) Correlation between tannin content and testa colour in faba beans (Vicia faba L.). FABIS 13, 38–40.Google Scholar
  16. Podoler H. and Applebaum W. (1968) Physiological aspects of host specificity in Bruchidae — V. varietal differences in the resistance of Vicia faba L. to Callosobruchus chinensis L. J. Stored Prod. Res. 4, 9–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Price M. L., Scoyoc S. V. and Butler L. G. (1978) Critical evaluation of vanillin reaction as an assay for tannin in sorghum grain. J. Agric. Fd. Chem. 26, 1214–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rowland G. G. and Fowler D. B. (1977) Factors affecting selection for seed coat thickness in faba beans (Vicia faba L.). J. Crop Sci. 17, 88–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shazali M. E. H. (1986) The biology of Bruchidis incarnatus (Boh.) infesting faba beans (Vicia faba). Annu. Rep., Shambat Research Station, Khartoum North, Sudan.Google Scholar
  20. Solomon M. E. (1951) Control of humidity with potassium by droxide, sulphuric acid or other solutions. Bull, entomol. Res. 42, 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Southgate B. J. (1958) Systematic notes on species of Callosobruchus of economic importance. Bull, entomol. Res. 48, 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Southgate B. J. (1984) Observations on the larval emergence in Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Entomol. Gener. 9, 177–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Swain T. (1978) In Biochemical Aspects of Plant and Animal Co-evolution (Edited by Harborne J. B.), 1–19. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICIPE 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. E. Hassan Shazali
    • 1
  1. 1.Grain Storage Research CentreShambat Research StationKhartoum NorthSudan

Personalised recommendations