Advertisement

International Journal of Tropical Insect Science

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 807–811 | Cite as

Phytophagy of Sergentomyia ingrami — II. Feeding Performance On Selected Indigenous and Exotic Plants

  • J. B. Kaddu
  • M. J. Mutinga
  • S. Nokoe
  • R. M. Musyoki
Research Article

Abstract

Feeding performances of 3509 male and 4838 female sandflies, Sergentomyia ingrami, fed on 46 native or indigenous and exotic or introduced species belonging to 21 families of plants found in Kenya were examined. The results indicated more feeding on certain families than on others. The most used families were Musaceae, Araceae and Compositae, while the least was Alliaceae. A liking for certain species was also detected in families with more than one species investigated. Generally, the most used species were Bidens pilosa (Compositae) and Lycopersicon esculentum (Solanaceae). Interaction between the sex of the sandflies and the tested plants was minimal, suggesting that in most cases males and females had similar species likings. Sergentomyia ingrami fed more on two of the exotic species investigated.

Key Words

Sandfly Sergentomyia ingrami phytophagy feeding performance 

Résumé

Les performances trophiques de 3509 p h lé bot ornes mâles et 4838 phlébotomes femelles de l’espèce Sergentomyia ingrami étaient examinees. Les Phlébotomes étaient nourris sur 46 espèces de plantes indigènes et exotiques appartenant à 21 familles de plantes trouvées aux Kenya. Les résultats ont montré que certaines familles de plantes étaient mieux utilisées que d’autres. Les familles les plus utilisées étaient Musaceae, Araceae et Compositae, tandis que les Alliaceae ont constitué les plantes les moins utilisées. Aussi, une preference chez certaines espèces de plantes était détectée dans certaines familles ayant plus d’une espèce étudiée. Dans l’ensemble, les espèces de plantes les plus utilisées étaient Bidens pilosa (Compositae) et Lycopersicon esculentum (Solanaceae). L’interaction entre le sexe (de phlébotome) et les plantes testées était moindre, ceci suggère que dans la plupart des cas, les phlébotomes mâles et femelles avaient une préférence similaire pour les même espèces de plantes. S. ingrami se nourrit plus sur 2 des espèces de plantes exotiques étudiées.

Mots Clés

Phlébotomes Sergentomyia ingrami phytophagie performance alimentaire 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler S. and Theodor O. (1957) Transmission of disease agents by Phlebotomine sandflies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2, 203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beach R., Young D. G. and Mutinga M. J. (1983) New Phlebotomus sandfly colonies: Rearing Phlebotomus martini, Sergentomyia africana (Diptera: Psychodidae). J. med. Entomol. 20, 579–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaman-Mbaya V. and Muhammed S. I. (1976) Antibiotic action of Solanum incanum Linnaeus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 9, 920–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaddu J. B. and Mutinga M. J. (1981) Leishmania in Kenyan phlebotomine sandflies— 1. Leishmania aethiopica in the midgut of naturally-infected Phlebotomus pedifer. Insect Sci. Applic. 2, 245–250.Google Scholar
  5. Kaddu J. B. (1986) Leishmania in Kenyan Phlebotomine sandflies — III. Advances in the investigation of vectorial capacity and vector parasite relationships of various species of sandflies. In Kenya. Insect Sci. Applic. 7, 207–212.Google Scholar
  6. Kaddu J.B., Mutinga M.J. and Nyamori M.P. (1986) Leishmania in Kenyan Phlebotomine sandflies — IV. Artificial feeding and attempts to infect six species of laboratory-reared sandflies with Leishmania donovani. Insect Sci. Applic. 7, 731–735.Google Scholar
  7. Kaddu J. B., Nyamori M. P. and Musyoki R. M. (1987) Interaction of Leishmania, bacteria and fungi. In Proceedings of the Third Mediterranean Conference of Parasitology, p. 63. Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
  8. Kaddu J. B., Mutinga M. J., Nokoe S. and Musyoki R. M. (1992) Sandfly-plant interaction I. Phytophagy of Sergentomyia ingrami. Part I: Feeding rates. Insect Sci. Applic. (in press).Google Scholar
  9. Mckee R. K. (1959) Factors affecting the toxicity of solanin. and related alkaloids to Fusarium caeruleum. J. gen. Microbiol. 20, 686–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schlein Y., Polacheck I. and Yuval B. (1985) Mycoses, bacterial infections and antibacterial activity of sandflies (Psychodidae) and their possible role in the transmission of leishmaniasis. Parasitology 90, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sherlock I. A. and Sherlock V. A. (1961) Sobre a infecao experimental de Phlebotomus longipalpis pela Leishmania donovani. Revta bras. Biol. 21, 409–418.Google Scholar
  12. Van Handel E. (1972) The detection of nectar in mosquitoes. Mosquito News 32, 458.Google Scholar
  13. Verdcourt B. and Trump E. C (1969) Common Poisonous Plants of East Africa. Collins, London.Google Scholar
  14. Watt J. M. and Breyer-Brandwijk G. M. (1962) The Medicinan and Poisonous Plants of Southert and Eastern Africa 2nd edition. Livingstone, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  15. Young C. J., Turner D. P., Killick-Kendrick R., Rioux A. J. and Leaney A. J. (1980) Fructose in wild-caught Phlebotomus ariosi. and the possible relevance of sugars taken by sandflies to the transmission of leishmaniasis. Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 74, 363–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICIPE 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. B. Kaddu
    • 1
  • M. J. Mutinga
    • 1
  • S. Nokoe
    • 1
  • R. M. Musyoki
    • 1
  1. 1.The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE)NairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations