Advertisement

International Journal of Tropical Insect Science

, Volume 5, Issue 6, pp 509–511 | Cite as

Resistance to Hyalomma Anatolicum Anatolicum Koch (1844) and Rhipicephalus Evertsi Neumann (1897) (Ixodoidea: Ixodidae) by Cattle in the Sudan

  • A. A. Latif
Research Article

Abstract

A test with 100 nymphs of Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum for evaluation of resistance of cattle to ticks was found to have a good potential for assessing the resistance status of cattle. Thus, 7% of nymphs engorged and moulted on a resistant host with average engorgement weight of 7.6 mg compared to 19 and 45% of engorged nymphs on two susceptible hosts with 15.8 and 13.6 mg average engorgement weights. Similarly, the number of detached fully engorged Rhipicephalus evertsi nymphs dropped from the resistant cows ranged between 14 and 57 compared with 118–124 from the two susceptible animals. The correlations between the three parameters; ranking cattle for resistance (natural tick burdens), the number of detached fully engorged R. evertsi nymphs, and the percentage survival of H. a. anatolicum nymphs after artificial infestation are discussed and found to be significant (r = 0.778; r = +0.886; r = +0.936). It is, therefore possible to assess the overall resistance status of hosts and cull the susceptible, if necessary.

Key Words

Hyalomma anatolicum Rhipicephalus evertsi cattle resistance to ticks the Sudan susceptible host tick burden 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kaiser M. N., Sutherst R. W. and Bourne A. S. (1982) Relationships between ticks and zebu cattle in Southern Uganda. Trap. anim. Hlth Prod. 14, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Latif A. A. (1984) Resistance to natural tick infestations in different breeds of cattle in Sudan. Insect Sci. Applic. 5, 95–97.Google Scholar
  3. Sutherst R. W., Roberts J. A. and Wagland B. M. (1979a) Resistance in cattle to Haemaphysalis (Kaiseriana) longi-cornis. Int. J. Parasit. 9, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Sutherst R. W., Wharton R. H., Cook I. M., Sutherland I. D. and Bourne A. S. (1979b) Long-term population studies on the cattle tick Boophilus microplus on untreated cattle selected for different levels of tick resistance. Aust. J. agric. Res. 30, 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Sutherst R. W., Norton G. A. and Maywald G. F. (1979c) Analysis of control strategies for cattle tick on Zebu x British cattle. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Conference of Australian Veterinary Association, pp. 46–51.Google Scholar
  6. Trager W. (1939) Acquired immunity to ticks. J. Parasit. 25, 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Utech K. B. W., Wharton R. H. and Kerr J. D. (1978a) Resistance to Boophilus microplus in different breeds of cattle. Aust. J. agric. Res. 29, 885–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Utech K. B. W., Seifert G. W. and Wharton R. H. (1978b) Breeding Australian Illawarra shorthorn cattle for re-sistance to Boophilus microplus. I. Factors affecting resistance. Aust. J. agric. Res. 29, 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wharton R. H., Harley K. L. S., Wilkinson P. R., Utech K. B. W. and Kelley B. M. (1969) A comparison of cattle tick control by pasture spelling, planned dipping, and tick resistant cattle. Aust. J. agric. Res. 20, 783–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wharton R. H. and Utech K. B. W. (1970) The relation between engorgement and dropping of Boophilus micro -plus (Canestrini Ixodidae) to the assessment of tick numbers on cattle. J. Aust. ent. Soc. 9, 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wikel S. K. (1982) Immune responses to arthropods and their products. A. Rev. Ent. 27, 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICIPE 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Latif
    • 1
  1. 1.Tick and Tick-borne Diseases Control Project, c/o FAOKhartoumSudan

Personalised recommendations