Advertisement

Intensity Levels of Stem-Borers in Maize and Sorghum and the Effect on Yield Under Different Intercropping Patterns

  • Kenuel Ogwaro
Article

Abstract

At harvest taller plants of both sorghum and maize produced a greater grain yield, but under intercropping conditions maize always out-yielded sorghum when planted at the same time, whether the sorghum was planted in the same hill as maize, or in alternate hills, or in alternate rows. There were generally more stem-borers in sorghum than in maize, with Chilo partellus predominating. Intercropping increased the level of stem-borers in maize, while infestation was very low in pure stands of maize, and the level of borer infestation in sorghum remained the same. Borers had a considerable effect on yield of maize at Mbita Point, on the shores of Lake Victoria: an infestation level of 38–52% of internodes bored resulted in significant yield loss. Implications of these results for predicting yield reduction due to stem-borers is discussed.

Key Words

Stem-borers maize sorghum intercropping effect on yield intensity levels infestation sowing pattern cron vield loss 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allyson S. (1977) A study of some North American larvae the genus Tetralopha Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae: Epipaschiinae). Can. Ent. 109, 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berberet R. C., Morrison R. D. and Wall R. G. (1979) Yield reduction caused by the lesser cornstalk-borer in non-irrigated Spanish peanuts. J. econ. Ent. 72, 526–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Evans A. C. and Sreedharan A. (1962) Studies of intercropping (2). Castor bean with groundnuts or soyabean. E. Afr. agric. For. J. 28, 7–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Harris K. M. (1962) Lepidopterous stem-borers of cereals in Nigeria. Bull. ent. Res. 53, 139–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ingram W. R. (1958) The lepidopterous stalk-borers associated with Gramineae in Uganda. Bull. ent. Res. 49, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Isaac P. V. and Rao K. V. (1941) A key for the identification of the larvae of the known lepidopterous borers of sugar-cane in India, based on morphological characters. Indian J. agric. Sci. 11, 795–803.Google Scholar
  7. Jackson R. D. and Peters D. C. (1963) Biological observations on the European corn-borer in South Eastern Missouri. J. econ. Ent. 56, 741–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lynch R. E. (1980) European corn-borer: yield losses in relation to hybrid and stage of corn development. J. econ. Ent. 73, 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lynch R. E., Robinson J. F. and Berry E. C. (1980) European corn-borer: yield losses and damage resulting from a simulated natural infestation. J. econ. Ent. 73, 141–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nye I. W. B. (1960) The insect pests of graminaceous crops in East Africa. Colon. Res. Stud. No. 31, 48 pp. London, H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
  11. Strickland A. H. (1952) The assessment of insect population in relation to crop losses. Trans. Ninth Int. Congr. Ent. Vol. I, pp. 611–618.Google Scholar
  12. Swaine G. (1957) The maize and sorghum stalk-borer, Busseola fusca (Fuller), in peasant agriculture in Tanganyika Territory. Bull. ent. Res. 48, 711–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Walker P. T. (1960) Insecticide studies on the maize stalk-borer, Busseola fusca (Fuller), and yield of maize. Bull. ent. Res. 51, 321–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICIPE 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenuel Ogwaro
    • 1
  1. 1.International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE)NairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations