Advertisement

International Journal of Tropical Insect Science

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 247–252 | Cite as

Egg-Chamber Development in the Ovarioles of The Fleshfly, Sarcophaga Tibialis Macquart (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), During The First Reproductive Cycle

  • Elizabeth D. Kokwaro
Article

Abstract

A polytrophic ovariole of the fleshfly, Sarcophaga tibialis Macquart, is composed of two successively maturing egg chambers, each consisting of an oocyte, an interconnected cluster of 15 nurse cells, and an enveloping layer of follicle cells. The oocyte is established at the posterior end of the egg chamber. Nurse cell differentiation is characterized by nucleolar multiplication. At 25°C the first egg generation took approximately 8 days to develop. During this period, the growth rate of the egg chamber increased with time. A dramatic increase occurred during days 4–6, and was associated with the formation of large intercellular spaces between the follicle cells as well as an accumulation of numerous yolk globules. Completion of egg-chamber development was marked by the degeneration of the cluster of nurse cells and that of follicle cells.

Key Words

Ovaries egg chamber differentiation development fleshfly Sarcophaga tibialis oocyte nurse cells follicle cells yolk 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abasa R. O. (1972) Reproductive biology of Sarcophaga tibialis (Diptera: Sarcophagidae)—II. Morphology of external and internal reproductive organs, ovary growth and oogenesis. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65, 400–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson E. (1964) Oocyte differentiation and vitelloge-nesis in the cockroach Periplaneta americana. J. Cell Biol. 20, 131–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson E. (1969) Oogenesis in the cockroach Periplaneta americana, with special reference to the specialization of the oolemma and the fate of coated vesicles. J. Micros-cop. 8, 721–738.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson E. and Spielman A. (1971) Permeability of the ovarian follicle of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. J.Cell Biol. 50, 101–221.Google Scholar
  5. Brown E. H. and King R. C (1964) Studies on the events resulting in the formation of an egg chamber in Droso-phila melanogaster. Growth 28, 41–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cruickshank W. J. (1971) Follicle cell protein synthesis in moth oocytes. J. Insect Physiol. 17, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giorgi F. (1978) Intercellular bridges in ovarian follicle cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Tiss. Res. 186, 413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodman T., Morrison P. E. and Davies D. M. (1967) Cytological changes in the developing ovary of the housefly fed milk and other diets. Can. J. Zool. 46, 409–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayat M. A. (1970) Principles and Techniques of Electron Microscopy. Biological Applications, Vol. 1. Van Nos-trand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Huebner E. and Anderson E. (1972) A cytological study of the ovary of Rhodnius prolixus—1. The ontogeny of the follicular epithelium. J. Morph. 136, 459–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ito S. and Karnovsky M. J. (1967) Formaldehyde-glutaral-dehyde fixatives containing trinitro compounds. J. Cell Biol. 39, 168A.Google Scholar
  12. King, R. C. (1970) Ovarian Development in Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. King R. C and Aggarwal S. K. (1965) Oogenesis in Hyalo-phora cecropia. Growth 29, 17–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. King R. C and Devine R. L. (1958) Oogenesis in adult Drosophila melanogaster—VII. The submicroscopic morphology of the ovary. Growth 22, 299–326.Google Scholar
  15. King R. G, Rubinson A. C. and Smith R. F. (1956) Oogenesis in adult Drosophila melanogaster. Growth 20, 121–157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. King R. C and Wolfsberg M. F. (1957) Oogenesis in adult Drosophila melanogaster—VI. A comparison of oogenesis among Drosophila melanogaster, virilis, pseudobscura and gibberosa. Growth 21, 281–285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nørrevang A. (1968) Electron microscopic morphology of oogenesis. Int. Rev. Cytol. 23, 114–186.Google Scholar
  18. Pantin C. F. A. (1960) Notes on Microscopical Techniques for Zoologists. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  19. Ramamurty P. S. (1964) Distribution of RNA in the ooplasm of scorpion fly. Sci. Cull. 30, 459–461.Google Scholar
  20. Stay B. (1965) Protein uptake in the oocytes of the cecropia moth. J. Cell Biol. 26, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Telfer W. H. (1961) The route of entry and localization of blood proteins in the oocytes of saturniid moths. J. bio-phys. biochem. Cytol. 9, 747–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Telfer W. H. and Smith D. S. (1970) Aspects of egg formation, In Insect Ultrastructure (Ed. by Neville A. C), pp. 117–134. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICIPE 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth D. Kokwaro
    • 1
  1. 1.The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE)NairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations