Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis: A single-blinded, double-dummy, randomized controlled trial

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Akupunktur Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Insufficient clinical trial data were available to prove the efficacy of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis. A multicenter, double-dummy, single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at the outpatient departments of acupuncture at 5 hospitals in China to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture. A total of 140 patients with migraine without aura were recruited and assigned randomly to 2 different groups: the acupuncture group treated with verum acupuncture plus placebo and the control group treated with sham acupuncture plus flunarizine. Treated by acupuncture 3 times per week and drugs every night, patients from both groups were evaluated at week 0 (baseline), week 4, and week 16. The primary outcome was measured by the proportion of responders (defined as the proportion of patients with a reduction of migraine days by at least 50%). The secondary outcome measures included the number of migraine days, visual analogue scale (VAS, 0 to 10 cm) for pain, as well as the physical and mental component summary scores of the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). The patients in the acupuncture group had better responder rates and fewer migraine days compared with the control group (P<.05), whereas there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in VAS scores and SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores (P>.05). The results suggested that acupuncture was more effective than flunarizine in decreasing days of migraine attacks, whereas no significantly differences were found between acupuncture and flunarizine in reduction of pain intensity and improvement of the quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Diener HC. Kopfschmerz-News 3/2011, 14–5

  2. Hróbjartsson A, Kaptchuk TJ, Miller FG. Placebo effect studies are susceptible to response bias and to other types of biases. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1223–9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Linde K, Fässler M, Meissner K Placebo interventions, placebo effects and clinical practice. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 27;366(1572):1905–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Diener HC et al. Efficacy of acupuncture for the prophylaxis of migraine: a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet Neurol. 2006 Apr;5(4):310–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Streng A et al. Effectiveness and tolerability of acupuncture compared with metoprolol in migraine prophylaxis. Headache. 2006 Nov–Dec;46(10):1492–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang CP et al. Acupuncture versus topiramate in chronic migraine prophylaxis: a randomized clinical trial. Cephalagia. 2011 nov;31(15):1510–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Linde K et al. Acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD001218

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Hammes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, LP., Zhang, XZ., Guo, J. et al. Efficacy of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis: A single-blinded, double-dummy, randomized controlled trial. Dtsch Z Akupunkt 55, 22–24 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dza.2012.02.001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dza.2012.02.001

Navigation