Journal of Bionic Engineering

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 401–439 | Cite as

Biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces with transition metals and their oxides: A review

Article

Abstract

Transition metals and their oxide materials have been widely employed to fabricate superhydrophobic surfaces, not only because of their surface topography with controllable microstructures leading to water-repellence, diverse adhesion even tunable wettability, but also due to a variety of special properties like optical performance, magnetism, anti-bacterial, transparency and so on. At the meantime, biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces have attracted great interest from fabricating hierarchical micro-/nano-structures inspired by nature to imitate creature’s properties and many potential applications, including self-cleaning, antifogging, antireflection, low drag and great stability and durability. In this review, natural surfaces and biomimetic materials with special wettability are introduced by classification according to the similar microstructure of morphology, like array structure, sheet overlapped structure, high density hairs and seta shaped structure. Not only do we exhibit their special performances, but also try to find out the true reasons behind the phenomenon. Then, the recent progress of a series of superhydrophobic transition mental and their oxide materials, including TiO2, ZnO, Fe3O4, CuO, Ag, Au and so on, is presented with a focus on fabricating methods, microstructures, wettability, and other properties. As followed, these superhydrophobic surfaces can be applied in many fields, such as oil/water separation, self-cleaning, photo-controlled reversible wettability, surface-enhanced Raman scattering, antibacterial, anticorrosion, and synthesis of various applications. However, few of them have been applied in practical life. Hence, we discuss the remaining challenges at present and the development tendency in future at the end of this article. This review aims to present recent development of transition metals and their oxides applied in biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces about fabrication, microstructure, water repellence, various properties, and potential applications.

Keywords

biomimetic superhydrophobic transition metals metal oxides 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Zhang Q, Zang K, Xu D, Yang G, Huang H, Ni F, Liu C, Yang S. CuO nanostructures: Synthesis, characterization, growth mechanisms fundamental properties, and applications. Progress in Materials Science, 2014, 60, 208–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Dutta S, Chattopadhyay S, Sarkar A, Chakrabarti M, Sanyal D, Jana D. Role of defects in tailoring structural, electrical and optical properties of ZnO. Progress in Materials Science, 2009, 54, 89–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Comini E, Baratto C, Faglia G, Ferroni M, Vomiero A, Sberveglieri G. Quasi-one dimensional metal oxide semiconductors: Preparation, characterization and application as chemical sensors. Progress in Materials Science, 2009, 54, 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Devan R, Patil R, Lin J, Ma Y. One-dimensional metal-oxide nanostructures: Recent developments in synthesis, characterization, and applications. Advanced Functional Materials, 2012, 22, 3326–3370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Johnson P B, Christy R W. Optical properties of transition metals: Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Pd. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 1974, 9, 5056–5070.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Yilmaz G, Bozkurt U, Magden K A. Effect of iron ions (Fe2+, Fe3+on the formation and structure of aerobic granular sludge. Biodegradation, 2017, 28, 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Raveau B. Transition metal oxides: Promising functional materials. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2005, 25, 1965–1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Kamath C R, Shah B. Phytochemical screening and standardization of polyherbal formulation: Maharishi Amrit Kalash 5. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2014, 6, 96–98.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Tamilarasan S, Laha S, Natarajan S, Gopalakrishnan J. Exploring the colour of 3D transition-metal ions in trigonal bipyramidal coordination: Identification of purple-blue (CoO5and beige-red (NiO5chromophores in LiMgBO3 host. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2016, 2016, 288–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Lee K P, Trochimowicz H J, Reinhardt C F. Pulmonary response of rats exposed to titanium dioxide (TiO2by inhalation for two years. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 1985, 79, 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Li D, Gao G, Meng F, Ji C. Preparation of nano-iron oxide red pigment powders by use of cyanided tailing. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 155, 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Richterová I, Pavlu J, Nemecek Z, Šafránková J. Model of secondary emission and its application on the charging of gold dust grains. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 2006, 74, 235430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Boardman J. Silver is white. Revue Archéologique, 1987, 279–295.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Darmanin T, de Givenchy E T, Amigoni S, Guittard F. Superhydrophobic surfaces by electrochemical processes. Advanced Materials, 2013, 25, 1378–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Sun M, Luo C, Xu L, Ji H, Ouyang Q, Yu D, Chen Y. Artificial lotus leaf by nanocasting. Langmuir, 2005, 21, 8978–8981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Yuan Z, Chen H, Tang J, Gong H, Liu Y. Wang Z, Shi P, Zhang J, Chen X. Novel preparation of polystyrene film with a superhydrophobic surface using a template method. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2007, 40, 3485–3489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Öner D, McCarthy T J. Ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Effects of topography length scales on wettability. Langmuir, 2000, 16, 7777–7782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Jopp J, Grüll H, Yerushalmi-Rozen R. Wetting behavior of water droplets on hydrophobic microtextures of comparable size. Langmuir, 2004, 20, 10015–10019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Lei J, Zhao Y, Zhai J. A lotus-leaf-like superhydrophobic surface: A porous microsphere/nanofiber composite film prepared by electrohydrodynamics. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2004, 43, 4338–4341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Ma M, Mao Y, Gupta M, Gleason K, Rutledge G. Superhydrophobic fabrics produced by electrospinning and chemical vapor deposition. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2005, 38, 9742–9748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Yoon M, Kim Y, Cho J. Multifunctional colloids with optical, magnetic, and superhydrophobic properties derived from nucleophilic substitution-induced layer-by-layer assembly in organic media. ACS Nano, 2011, 5, 5417–5426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Buck M E, Schwartz S C, Lynn D M. Superhydrophobic thin films fabricated by reactive layer-by-layer assembly of azlactone-functionalized polymers. Chemistry of Materials, 2010, 22, 6319–6327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Liu K, Jiang L. Metallic surfaces with special wettability. Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 825–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Li J, Shi L, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Guo Z, Su B, Liu W. Stable superhydrophobic coatings from thiol-ligand nanocrystals and their application in oil/water separation. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2012, 22, 9774–9781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Wang B, Li J, Wang G, Liang W, Zhang Y, Shi L, Guo Z, Liu W. Methodology for robust superhydrophobic fabrics and sponges from in situ growth of transition metal/metal oxide nanocrystals with thiol modification and their applications in oil/water separation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, 5, 1827–1839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Moradi S, Hadjesfandiari N, Toosi S F, Kizhakkedathu J, Hatzikiriakos S. Effect of extreme wettability on platelet adhesion on metallic implants: From superhydrophilicity to superhydrophobicity. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8, 17631–17641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Barthlott W, Neinhuis C. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta, 1997, 202, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Feng L, Li S, Li Y, Zhang L, Zhai J, Song Y, Liu B, Jiang L, Zhu D. Super-hydrophobic surfaces: From natural to artificial. Advanced Materials, 2002, 14, 1857–1860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Wang G, Guo Z, Liu W. Interfacial effects of superhydrophobic plant surfaces: A review. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2014, 11, 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Ma J W. Impact of Surface Topography on Colloidal and Bacterial Adhesion. Master thesis, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA, 2011.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Feng L, Zhang Y, Xi J, Xi J, Zhu Y, Wang N, Xia F, Jiang L. Petal effect: A superhydrophobic state with high adhesive force. Langmuir, 2008, 24, 4114–4119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Guo Z, Liu W. Biomimic from the superhydrophobic plant leaves in nature: Binary structure and unitary structure. Plant Science, 2007, 172, 1103–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Koch K, Bhushan B, Barthlott W. Multifunctional surface structures of plants: An inspiration for biomimetics. Progress in Materials Science, 2009, 54, 137–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Gao X, Yan X, Yao X, Xu L, Zhang K, Zhang J, Yang B, Jiang L. The dry-style antifogging properties of mosquito compound eyes and artificial analogues prepared by soft lithography. Advanced Materials, 2010, 19, 2213–2217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Bidlingmayer W L. How mosquitoes see traps: Role of visual responses. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 1994, 10, 272–279.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Sun M, Watson G S, Zheng Y, Watson J A, Liang A. Wetting properties on nanostructured surfaces of cicada wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2009, 212, 3148–3155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Zhang G, Zhang J, Xie G, Liu Z, Shao H. Cicada wings: A stamp from nature for nanoimprint lithography. Small, 2006, 2, 1440–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Prum R O, Quinn T, Torres R H. Anatomically diverse butterfly scales all produce structural colours by coherent scattering. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2006, 209, 748–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Zheng Y, Gao X, Jiang L. Directional adhesion of superhydrophobic butterfly wings. Soft Matter, 2007, 3, 178–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Han Z, Mu Z, Li B, Wang Z, Zhang J, Niu S, Ren L. Active antifogging property of monolayer SiO2 film with bioinspired multiscale hierarchical pagoda structures. ACS Nano, 2016, 10, 8591–8602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Bixler G D, Bhushan B F. Fluid drag reduction and efficient self-cleaning with rice leaf and butterfly wing bioinspired surfaces. Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 7685–7710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Autumn K, Liang Y A, Hsieh S T, Hsieh T, Zesch W, Chan W, Kenny T, Fearing R, Full R. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature, 2000, 405, 681–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Liu K, Du J, Wu J, Jiang L. Superhydrophobic gecko feet with high adhesive forces towards water and their bio-inspired materials. Nanoscale, 2012, 4, 768–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Barthlott W, Schimmel T, Wiersch S, Koch K, Brede M, Barczewski M, Walheim S, Weis A, Kaltenmaier A, Leder A, Bohn H. The salvinia paradox: Superhydrophobic surfaces with hydrophilic pins for air retention under water. Advanced Materials, 2010, 22, 2325–2328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    Corbett J J, Koehler H W. Updated emissions from ocean shipping. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2003, 108, 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    Eyring V, Köhler H W, Van Aardenne J, Lauer A. Emissions from international shipping: 1. The last 5years. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2005, 110, D17305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Feng X Q, Gao X, Wu Z, Jiang L, Zheng Q. Superior water repellency of water strider legs with hierarchical structures: Experiments and analysis. Langmuir, 2007, 23, 4892–4896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    Cai Y, Lin L, Xue Z, Liu M, Wang S, Jiang L. Filefishinspired surface design for anisotropic underwater oleophobicity. Advanced Functional Materials, 2014, 24, 809–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    Martin J T, JuniPer B E. The Cuticles of Plants, Edward Arnold (Publisher Ltd., London, UK, 1970.Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    Bhushan B, Jung Y C. Natural and biomimetic artificial surfaces for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, low adhesion, and drag reduction. Progress in Materials Science, 2011, 56, 1–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    Chen X, Selloni A. Introduction: Titanium dioxide (TiO2nanomaterials. Chemical Reviews, 2014, 114, 9281–9282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    Anpo M, Dohshi S, Kitano M, Hu Y, Takeuchi M, Matsuoka M. The preparation and characterization of highly efficient titanium oxide-based photofunctional materials. Annual Review of Materials Science, 2005, 35, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    Kamegawa T, Shimizu Y, Yamashita H. Superhydrophobic surfaces with photocatalytic self-cleaning properties by nanocomposite coating of TiO2 and polytetrafluoroethylen. Advanced Materials, 2012, 24, 3697–3700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    Crick C R, Bear J C, Kafizas A, Parkin I. Superhydrophobic photocatalytic surfaces through direct incorporation of titania nanoparticles into a polymer matrix by aerosol assisted chemical vapor deposition. Advanced Materials, 2012, 24, 3505–3508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    Qing Y, Yang C, Yu N, Shang Y, Sun Y, Wang L, Liu C. Superhydrophobic TiO2/polyvinylidene fluoride composite surface with reversible wettability switching and corrosion resistance. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 290, 37–44.Google Scholar
  56. [56]
    Teisala H, Tuominen M, Stepien M, Haapanen J, Mäkelä J, Saarinen J, Toivakka J, Kuusipalo J. Wettability conversion on the liquid fame spray generated superhydrophobic TiO2 nanoparticle coating on paper and board by photocatalytic decomposition of spontaneously accumulated carbonaceous overlayer. Cellulose, 2013, 20, 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. [57]
    Lu Y, Sathasivam S, Song J, Crick C, Carmalt C, Parkin I. Robust self-cleaning surfaces that function when exposed to either air or oil. Science, 2015, 347, 1132–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. [58]
    Zhang X, Guo Y, Zhang Z, Zhang P. Self-cleaning superhydrophobic surface based on titanium dioxide nanowires combined with polydimethylsiloxane. Applied Surface Science, 2013, 284, 319–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. [59]
    Dong J, Yao Z, Yang T, Jiang L, Shen C. Control of superhydrophilic and superhydrophobic graphene interface. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3, 1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    Naghdi S, Jaleh B, Shahbazi N. Reversible wettability conversion of electrodeposited graphene oxide/titania nanocomposite coating: Investigation of surface structures. Applied Surface Science, 2016, 368, 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. [61]
    Wang X, Song J, Liu J, Wang Z. Direct-current nanogenerator driven by ultrasonic waves. Science, 2007, 316, 102–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    Omri K, Najeh I, Dhahri R, Ghoul J E, Mir L E. Effects of temperature on the optical and electrical properties of ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by sol–gel method. Microelectronic Engineering, 2014, 128, 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. [63]
    Sun X W, Wang J X. Fast switching electrochromic display using a viologen-modified ZnO nanowire array electrode. Nano Letters, 2008, 8, 1884–1889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    Moon T H, Jeong M C, Oh B Y, Ham M H, Jeun M H, Lee W Y, Myoung J M. Chemical surface passivation of HfO2 films in a ZnO nanowire transistor. Nanotechnology, 2006, 17, 2116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. [65]
    Chai G Y, Lupan O, Rusu E V, Stratn G I, Ursaki V U, Sontea U, Khallaf H, Chow L. Functionalized individual ZnO microwire for natural gas detection. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2012, 176, 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. [66]
    Huang Y, Sarkar D K, Chen X G. Superhydrophobic nanostructured ZnO thin films on aluminum alloy substrates by electrophoretic deposition process. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 327, 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. [67]
    Gao D, Jia M. Hierarchical ZnO particles grafting by fluorocarbon polymer derivative: Preparation and superhydrophobic behavior. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 343, 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. [68]
    Hahn Y B. Zinc oxide nanostructures and their applications. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2011, 28, 1797–1813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. [69]
    Wahab R, Ansari S G, Kim Y S, Seo H K, Shin H S. Room temperature synthesis of needle-shaped ZnO nanorods via sonochemical method. Applied Surface Science, 2007, 253, 7622–7626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. [70]
    Chen W J, Liu W L, Hsieh S H, Tsai T K. Preparation of nanosized ZnO using a brass. Applied Surface Science, 2007, 253, 6749–6753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. [71]
    Nikoobakht B, Wang X, Herzing A, Shi J. Cheminform abstract: Scalable synthesis and device integration of self-registered one-dimensional zinc oxide nanostructures and related materials. Chemical Society Reviews, 2013, 44, 342–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. [72]
    Xu T, Ji P, He M. Lin J. Growth and structure of pure ZnO micro/nanocombs. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2012, 2012, 1875–1890.Google Scholar
  73. [73]
    Yang F, Guo Z. Characterization of micro-morphology and wettability of lotus leaf, waterlily leaf and biomimetic ZnO surface. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2015, 12, 88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. [74]
    PauportéTh, Bataille G, Joulaud L, Vermersch F J. Well-aligned ZnO nanowire arrays prepared by seed-layer-free electrodeposition and their cassie-wenzel transition after hydrophobization. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2011, 114, 194–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. [75]
    Chiu W S, Khiew P S, Cloke M, Isa D, Tan T K, Radiman S, Abd-Shukor R, Hamid M A, Huang N W, Lim H N, Chia C H. Photocatalytic study of two-dimensional ZnO nanopellets in the decomposition of methylene blue. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 158, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. [76]
    Li J, Sun Q, Yao Q, Wang J, Han S, Jin C. Fabrication of robust superhydrophobic bamboo based on ZnO nanosheet networks with improved water-, UV-, and fire-resistant properties. Journal of Nanomaterials 2015, 2015, 431426.Google Scholar
  77. [77]
    Polshettiwar V, Baruwati B, Varma R S. Self-assembly of metal oxides into three-dimensional nanostructures: Synthesis and application in catalysis. ACS Nano, 2009, 3, 728–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. [78]
    Bitenc M, Orel Z C. Synthesis and characterization of crystalline hexagonal bipods of zinc oxide. Materials Research Bulletin, 2009, 44, 381–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. [79]
    Dai S, Zhang D, Shi Q, Han X, Wang S, Du Z. Biomimetic fabrication and tunable wetting properties of three-dimensional hierarchical ZnO structures by combining soft lithography templated with lotus leaf and hydrothermal treatments. Crystengcomm, 2013, 15, 5417–5424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. [80]
    Hao X, Wu G, Wang L, Lv D, Luo Y, Li L, He N. Superhydrophobic surfaces based on ZnO-constructed hierarchical architectures. Microelectronic Engineering, 2015, 141, 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. [81]
    Yu L, Hao G, Gu J, Zhou S, Zhang N, Jiang W. Fe3O4/PS magnetic nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization and their application as sorbents of oil from waste water. Journal of Magnetism & Magnetic Materials, 2015, 394, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. [82]
    Wu L, Zhang J, Li B, Wang A. Magnetically driven super durable superhydrophobic polyester materials for oil/water separation. Polymer Chemistry, 2014, 5, 2382–2390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. [83]
    Zieba J, Frydrysiak M. Modeling of textile magnetic core. Smartex Research Journal, 2012, 1, 102–110.Google Scholar
  84. [84]
    Zhu Q, Chu Y, Wang Z, Chen N, Lin L, Liu F, Pan Q. Robust superhydrophobic polyurethane sponge as a highly reusable oil-absorption material. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2013, 1, 5386–5393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. [85]
    Wu L, Li L, Li B, Zhang J, Wang A. Magnetic, durable, and superhydrophobic polyurethane@ Fe3O4@ SiO2@ fluoropolymer sponges for selective oil absorption and oil/water separation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7, 4936–4946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. [86]
    Li Z, Jiang Z, Fei B, Cai Z, Pan X. Comparison of bamboo green, timber and yellow in sulfite, sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide pretreatments for enzymatic saccharification. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 151, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. [87]
    Yu X, Liu S, Yu J. Superparamagnetic?-Fe2O3@SiO2@TiO2 composite microspheres with superior photocatalytic properties. Applied Catalysis B, 2011, 104, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. [88]
    Jin C, Yao Q, Li J, Fan B, Sun Q. Fabrication, superhydro phobicity, and microwave absorbing properties of the magnetic ?-Fe2O3/bamboo composites. Materials & Design, 2015, 85, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. [89]
    Yu Y, Jiang Z, Wang G, Tian G, Wang H, Song Y. Surface functionalization of bamboo with nanostructured ZnO. Wood Science and Technology, 2012, 46, 781–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. [90]
    Si Y, Guo Z. Superhydrophobic nanocoatings: From materials to fabrications and to applications. Nanoscale, 2015, 7, 5922–5946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. [91]
    Bao X, Cui J, Sun H, Liang W, Zhu Z, An J, Yang B, La P, Li A. Facile preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces based on metal oxide nanoparticles. Applied Surface Science, 2014, 303, 473–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. [92]
    Emsley J. Nature’s Building Blocks: An A-Z Guide to the Elements, Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 2011.Google Scholar
  93. [93]
    Gong Z J, Wang J L, Wu L M, Wang X Y. Lv G C, Liao L B. Fabrication of super hydrophobic surfaces on copper by solution-immersion. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2013, 21, 920–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. [94]
    Shirtcliffe N J, Mchale G, Newton M I, Perry C C. Wetting and wetting transitions on copper-based super-hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir the ACS Journal of Surfaces & Colloids, 2015, 21, 937–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. [95]
    Fan Y, Li C, Chen Z, Hong C. Study on fabrication of the superhydrophobic sol–gel films based on copper wafer and its anti-corrosive properties. Applied Surface Science, 2012, 258, 6531–6536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. [96]
    La D D, Nguyen T A, Lee S, Kim J W, Yong S K. A stable superhydrophobic and superoleophilic cu mesh based on copper hydroxide nanoneedle arrays. Applied Surface Science, 2011, 257, 5705–5710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. [97]
    Su F, Yao K. Facile fabrication of superhydrophobic surface with excellent mechanical abrasion and corrosion resistance on copper substrate by a novel method. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014, 6, 8762–8770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. [98]
    Wang H, Yu J, Wu Y, Shao W, Xu X. A facile two-step approach to prepare superhydrophobic surfaces on copper substrates. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2014, 2, 5010–5017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. [99]
    Zhang N, Lu S, Xu W, Zhang Y. Controlled growth of CuO-Cu3Pt/Cu micro-nano binary architectures on copper substrate and its superhydrophobic behavior. New Journal of Chemistry, 2014, 38, 4534–4540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. [100]
    Wang P, Zhang D, Qiu R, Wu J. Super-hydrophobic metal-complex film fabricated electrochemically on copper as a barrier to corrosive medium. Corrosionence, 2014, 83, 317–326.Google Scholar
  101. [101]
    Ou J, Hu W, Liu S, Xue M, Wang F, Li W. Superoleophobic textured copper surfaces fabricated by chemical etching/ oxidation and surface fluorination. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, 5, 10035–10041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. [102]
    Cheng Z, Lai H, Du Y, Fu K, Hou R, Zhang N, Sun K. Underwater superoleophilic to superoleophobic wetting control on the nanostructured copper substrates. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, 5, 11363–11370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. [103]
    Pan Q, Jin H, Wang H. Fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces on interconnected Cu(OH)nanowires via solution- immersion. Nanotechnology, 2007, 18, 355605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. [104]
    Li Y, Jia W Z, Song Y Y, Xia X H. Superhydrophobicity of 3D porous copper films prepared using the hydrogen bubble dynamic template. Chemistry of Materials, 2016, 19, 5758–5764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. [105]
    Shirtcliffe N J, Mchale G, Newton M I, Zhang Y. Superhydrophobic copper tubes with possible flow enhancement and drag reduction. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2009, 1, 1316–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. [106]
    Pei M D, Wang B, Li E, Zhang X H, Song X M, Yan H. The fabrication of superhydrophobic copper films by a low-pressure-oxidation method. Applied Surface Science, 2010, 256, 5824–5827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. [107]
    Wang G, Zhang T Y. Oxygen adsorption induced superhydrophilic- to-superhydrophobic transition on hierarchical nanostructured cuo surface. Journal of Colloid & Interface Science, 2012, 377, 438–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. [108]
    La D D, Nguyen T A, Lee S, Kim J W, Yong S K. A stable superhydrophobic and superoleophilic cu mesh based on copper hydroxide nanoneedle arrays. Applied Surface Science, 2011, 257, 5705–5710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. [109]
    Darmanin T, De Givenchy E T, Amigoni S, Guittard F. Superhydrophobic surfaces by electrochemical processes. Advanced Materials, 2013, 25, 1378–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. [110]
    Li J, Guo Z, Liu J H, Huang X J. Copper nanowires array: Controllable construction and tunable wettability. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2011, 115, 16934–16940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. [111]
    Sasmal A K, Mondal C, Sinha A K, Gauri S S, Pal J, Aditya T, Ganguly M, Dey S, Pal T. Fabrication of superhydrophobic copper surface on various substrates for roll-off, self-cleaning, and water/oil separation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014, 6, 22034–22043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. [112]
    Yuan X, Setyawati M I, Leong D T, Xie J P. Ultrasmall Ag+-rich nanoclusters as highly efficient nanoreservoirs for bacterial killing. Nano Research, 2014, 7, 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. [113]
    Jiang X, Yang M, Meng Y, Jiang W, Zhan J. Cysteamine- modified silver nanoparticle aggregates for quantitative sers sensing of pentachlorophenol with a portable raman spectrometer. Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, 5, 6902–6908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. [114]
    Belloni J. Photography: Enhancing sensitivity by silver- halide crystal doping. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 2003, 67, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. [115]
    Henglein A, Tausch-Treml R. Optical absorption and catalytic activity of subcolloidal and colloidal silver in aqueous solution: A pulse radiolysis study. Journal of Colloid & Interface Science, 1981, 80, 84–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. [116]
    Xu X, Zhang Z, Yang J. Fabrication of biomimetic superhydrophobic surface on engineering materials by a simple electroless galvanic deposition method. Langmuir, 2009, 26, 3654–3658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. [117]
    Inberg A, Ginsburg E, Shacham-Diamand Y, Croitoru N, Seidman A. Electroless and sputtered silver–tungsten thin films for microelectronics applications. Microelectronic Engineering, 2003, 65, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. [118]
    Ngo H T, Wang H N, Fales A M, Vo-Dinh T. DNA biosensor based on SERS molecular sentinel on nanowave chip. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2013, 85, 6378–6383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. [119]
    Park J H, Park J K, Shin H Y, Park J H, Park J K, Shin H Y. The preparation of Ag/mesoporous silica by direct silver reduction and Ag/functionalized mesoporous silica by in situ formation of adsorbed silver. Materials Letters, 2007, 61, 156–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. [120]
    Dubas S T, Kumlangdudsana P, Potiyaraj P. Layer-by-layer deposition of antimicrobial silver nanoparticles on textile fibers. Colloids & Surfaces A, 2006, 289, 105–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. [121]
    Shateri-Khalilabad M, Yazdanshenas M E. Fabrication of superhydrophobic, antibacterial, and ultraviolet-blocking cotton fabric. Journal of the Textile Institute, 2013, 104, 861–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. [122]
    Heinonen S, Huttunen-Saarivirta E, Nikkanen J P, Raulio M, Priha O, Laakso J, Storgårds E, Levänen E. Antibacterial properties and chemical stability of superhydrophobic silver-containing surface produced by sol–gel route. Colloids and Surfaces A, 2014, 453, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. [123]
    Xia Y, Wu Y, Hang T, Chang J, Li M. Electrodeposition of high density silver nanosheets with controllable morphologies served as effective and reproducible SERS substrates. Langmuir, 201, 32, 3385-3392.Google Scholar
  124. [124]
    Agnihotri S, Mukherji S, Mukherji S. Immobilized silver nanoparticles enhance contact killing and show highest efficacy: Elucidation of the mechanism of bactericidal action of silver. Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 7328–7340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. [125]
    Yang H, Liu Y, Shen Q, Chen L, You W, Wang X, Sheng J. Mesoporous silica microcapsule-supported Ag nanoparticles fabricated via nano-assembly and its antibacterial properties. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2012, 22, 24132–24138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. [126]
    Wu Y. Hang T, Komadina J, Ling H, Li M. High-adhesive superhydrophobic 3D nanostructured silver films applied as sensitive, long-lived, reproducible and recyclable SERS substrates. Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 9720–9726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. [127]
    Wang Z, Ou J, Wang Y, Xue M, Wang F, Pan B, Li C, Li W. Anti-bacterial superhydrophobic silver on diverse substrates based on the mussel-inspired polydopamine. Surface & Coatings Technology, 2015, 280, 378–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. [128]
    Ye W, Yan J, Ye Q, Zhou F. Template-free and direct electrochemical deposition of hierarchical dendritic gold microstructures: Growth and their multiple applications. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2010, 114, 15617–15624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. [129]
    Huang J, Han X, Wang D, Liu D, You T. Facile synthesis of dendritic gold nanostructures with hyperbranched architectures and their electrocatalytic activity toward ethanol oxidation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, 5, 9148–9154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. [130]
    Sun M, Watson G S, Zheng Y, Watson J A, Liang A. Wetting properties on nanostructured surfaces of cicada wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2009, 212, 3148–3155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. [131]
    Mo X, Wu Y, Zhang J, Hang T, Li M. Bioinspired multifunctional au nanostructures with switchable adhesion. Langmuir the ACS Journal of Surfaces & Colloids, 2015, 31, 10850–10858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. [132]
    Osicka J, Ilcikova M, Popelka A, Filip F, Bertok T, Tkac J, Kasak P. Simple, reversible and fast modulation in superwettability, gradient and adsorption by counterion exchange on self-assembled monolayer. Langmuir, 2016, 32, 5491–5499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. [133]
    Miyauchi M, Shibuya M, Zhao Z G, Liu Z. Surface wetting behavior of a WO3 electrode under light-irradiated or potential- controlled conditions. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009, 113, 10642–10646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. [134]
    Gu C, Zhang J, Tu J. A strategy of fast reversible wettability changes of WO3 surfaces between superhydrophilicity and superhydrophobicity. Journal of Colloid & Interface Science, 2010, 352, 573–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. [135]
    Wang N, Yuan Y, Wu Y, Hang T, Li M. Wetting transition of the caterpillar-like superhydrophobic Cu/Ni-Co hierarchical structure by heat treatment. Langmuir the ACS Journal of Surfaces & Colloids, 2015, 31, 10807–10812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. [136]
    Zhang X, Li Z, Liu K, Jiang L. Bioinspired multifunctional foam with self-cleaning and oil/water separation. Advanced Functional Materials, 2013, 23, 2881–2886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. [137]
    Kujawinski E B, Kido Soule M C, Valentine D L, Boysen A K, Longnecker K, Redmond M C. Fate of dispersants associated with the deepwater horizon oil spill. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45, 1298–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. [138]
    Wang B, Li J, Wang G, Liang W, Zhang Y, Shi L, Guo Z, Liu W. Methodology for robust superhydrophobic fabrics and sponges from in situ growth of transition metal/metal oxide nanocrystals with thiol modification and their applications in oil/water separation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, 5, 1827–1839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. [139]
    Crick C, Gibbins J, Parkin I. Superhydrophobic polymercoated copper-mesh; membranes for highly efficient oil-water separation. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2013, 1, 5943–5948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. [140]
    Yang J, Zhang Z Z, Xu X H, Zhu X T, Men X H, Zhou X Y. Superhydrophilic–superoleophobic coatings. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2012, 22, 2834–2837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. [141]
    Gui X, Wei J, Wang K, Cao A, Zhu H, Jia Y, Shu Q, Wu D. Carbon nanotube sponges. Advanced Materials, 2010, 22, 617–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. [142]
    Lee C H, Johnson N, Drelich J, Yap Y K. The performance of superhydrophobic and superoleophilic carbon nanotube meshes in water-oil filtration. Carbon, 2011, 49, 669–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. [143]
    Hayase G, Hayase G, Kanamori K, Fukuchi M, Kaji H, Nakanishi K. Facile synthesis of marshmallow-like macroporous gels usable under harsh conditions for the separation of oil and water. Angewandte Chemie, 2013, 52, 1986–1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. [144]
    Zhang Y, Wei S, Liu F, Du Y, Liu S, Ji Y, Yokoi T, Tatsumi T, Xiao F S. Superhydrophobic nanoporous polymers as efficient adsorbents for organic compounds. Nano Today, 2009, 4, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. [145]
    Cheng Y, Lu S, Xu W, Wen H, Wang J. Fabrication of superhydrophobic au-zn alloys surface on zinc substrate for roll-down, self-cleaning and anti-corrosion properties. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015, 3, 16774–16784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. [146]
    Guo J, Yang F, Guo Z. Fabrication of stable and durable superhydrophobic surface on copper substrates for oil-water separation and ice-over delay. Journal of Colloid & Interface Science, 2015, 466, 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. [147]
    Tan C, Li Q, Li Y, Zhang C, Xu L. Preparation of a stable superhydrophobic boat for efficient separation and removal of oil from water. RSC Advances, 2016, 6, 53813–53820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. [148]
    Pham V H, Dickerson J H. Superhydrophobic silanized melamine sponges as high efficiency oil absorbent materials. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014, 6, 14181–14188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. [149]
    Zhou X, Zhang Z, Xu X, Men X, Zhu X. Facile fabrication of superhydrophobic sponge with selective absorption and collection of oil from water. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52, 9411–9416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. [150]
    Yang X, Cranston E D. Chemically cross-linked cellulose nanocrystal aerogels with shape recovery and superabsorbent properties. Chemistry of Materials, 2014, 26, 6016–6025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. [151]
    Liu S, Xu Q, Latthe S S, Gurav A B, Xing R. Superhydrophobic/ superoleophilic magnetic polyurethane sponge for oil/water separation. RSC Advances, 2015, 5, 68293–68298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. [152]
    Peng H, Wang H, Wu J, Meng G, Wang Y, Shi Y, Liu Z, Guo X. Preparation of superhydrophobic magnetic cellulose sponge for removing oil from water. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55, 832–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. [153]
    Onda T, Shibuichi S, Satoh N, Tsujii K. Super-waterrepellent fractal surfaces. Langmuir, 1996, 12, 2125–2127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. [154]
    Sun T, Feng L, Gao X, Jiang L. Bioinspired surfaces with special wettability. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2005, 38, 644–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. [155]
    Feng L, Li S, Li Y, Li H, Zhang L, Zhai J, Song Y, Liu B, Jiang L, Zhu D. Super-hydrophobic surfaces: From natural to artificial. Advanced Materials, 2002, 14, 1857–1860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. [156]
    Li L, Liu Z, Zhang Q, Meng C, Zhang T, Zhai J. Underwater superoleophobic porous membrane based on hierarchical TiO2 nanotubes: Multifunctional integration of oil-water separation, flow-through photocatalysis and self-cleaning. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015, 3, 1279–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. [157]
    Crick C R, Ismail S, Pratten J, Parkin I P. An investigation into bacterial attachment to an elastomeric superhydrophobic surface prepared via, aerosol assisted deposition. Thin Solid Films, 2011, 519, 3722–3727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. [158]
    Ganesh V A, Nair A S, Raut H K, Walsh T M, Ramakrishna S. Photocatalytic superhydrophilic TiO2 coating on glass by electrospinning. RSC Advances, 2012, 2, 2067–2072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. [159]
    Crick C R, Parkin I P. Preparation and characterisation of super-hydrophobic surfaces. Chemistry-A European Journal, 2010, 16, 3568–3588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. [160]
    Teisala H, Tuominen M, Stepien M, Haapanen J, Mäkelä J M, Saarinen J J, Toivakka M, Kuusipalo J. Wettability conversion on the liquid flame spray generated superhydrophobic TiO2 nanoparticle coating on paper and board by photocatalytic decomposition of spontaneously accumulated carbonaceous overlayer. Cellular, 2013, 20, 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. [161]
    Fujishima A, Rao T N, Tryk D A. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis. Journal of Photochemistry & Photobiology C Photochemistry Reviews, 2000, 1, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. [162]
    Diebold U. The surface science of titanium dioxide. Surface Science Reports, 2003, 48, 53–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. [163]
    Carp O, Huisman C L, Reller A. Photoinduced reactivity of titanium dioxide. Progress in Solid State Chemistry, 2004, 32, 33–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. [164]
    Fujishima A. TiO2 photocatalysis and related surface phenomena. Meeting of the International Society of Electrochemistry, 2008, 63, 515–582.Google Scholar
  165. [165]
    Chen X, Selloni A. Introduction: Titanium dioxide (TiO2nanomaterials. Chemical Reviews, 2014, 114, 9281–9282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. [166]
    Xu Q F, Liu Y, Lin F J, Mondal B, Lyons A M. Superhydrophobic TiO2-polymer nanocomposite surface with UV-induced reversible wettability and self-cleaning properties. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, 5, 8915–8924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. [167]
    Ramakrishna S, Kumar K S S, Mathew D, Nair C P R. Superhydrophobic material with heat-healing and self-cleaning properties. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5, 18510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. [168]
    Milner S T. Polymer brushes. Science, 1991, 251, 905–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. [169]
    Russell T P, Surface-responsive materials. Science, 2002, 297, 964–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. [170]
    Sun T, Wang G, Feng L, Liu B, Ma Y, Jiang L, Zhu D. Reversible switching between superhydrophilicity and superhydrophobicity. Angewandte Chemie, 2004, 43, 357–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. [171]
    Motornov M, Minko S, Eichhorn K J, Nitschke M, Simon F, Stamm M. Reversible tuning of wetting behavior of polymer surface with responsive polymer brushes. Langmuir, 2003, 19, 8077–8085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. [172]
    Lahann J, Mitragotri S, Tran T N, Choi I S, Hoffer S, Somorjai G A, Langer R. Reversibly switching surface. Science, 2003, 299, 371–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. [173]
    Wang R, Hashimoto K, Fujishima A, Koijma M, Kitamura E, Watanabe A S T. Light-induced amphiphilic surfaces. Nature, 1997, 388, 431–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. [174]
    Zhang J, Lu X, Huang W, Han Y. Reversible superhydrophobicity to superhydrophilicity transition by extending and unloading an elastic polyamide film. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2005, 26, 477–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. [175]
    Hou W, Wang Q. UV-driven reversible switching of a polystyrene/ titania nanocomposite coating between superhydrophobicity and superhydrophilicity. Langmuir, 2009, 25, 6875–6879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. [176]
    Liu H, Feng L, Zhai J, Jiang L, Zhu D B. Reversible wettability of a chemical vapor deposition prepared ZnO film between superhydrophobicity and superhydrophilicity. Langmuir, 2004, 20, 5659–5661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. [177]
    Liu K, Cao M, Fujishima A, Jiang L. Bio-inspired titanium dioxide materials with special wettability and their applications. Chemical Reviews, 2014, 114, 10044–10094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. [178]
    Fujishima A, Zhang X, Tryk D A. TiO2 photocatalysis and related surface phenomena. Surface Science Reports, 2008, 63, 515–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. [179]
    Zhang L, Dillert R, Bahnemann D, Vormoor M. Photo-induced hydrophilicity and self-cleaning: models and reality. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5, 7491–7507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. [180]
    Wang R, Hashimoto K, Fujishima A, Chikuni M, Kojima E. Kitamura A, Shimohigoshi M, Watanabe T. Light-induced amphiphilic surfaces. Nature, 1997, 388, 431–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. [181]
    Banerjee S, Dionysiou D D, Pillai S C. Self-cleaning applications of TiO2 by photo-induced hydrophilicity and photocatalysis. Applied Catalysis B, 2015, 176, 396–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. [182]
    Zhang L, Dillert R, Bahnemann D, Vormoor M. Photo-induced hydrophilicity and self-cleaning: Models and reality. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5, 7491–7507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. [183]
    Liu Z, Zhang X, Murakami T, Fujishima A. Sol–gel SiO2/TiO2 bilayer films with self-cleaning and antireflection properties. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2008, 92, 1434–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. [184]
    Asahi R, Morikawa T, Ohwaki T, Aoki K, Taga Y. Visiblelight photocatalysis in nitrogen-doped titanium oxides. Science, 2001, 293, 269–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. [185]
    Borras A, Lopez C, Rico V, Gracia F, González-Elipe A R, Richter E, Battiston G, Gerbasi R, McSporran N, Sauthier G, György E, Figueras A. Effect of visible and UV illumination on the water contact angle of TiO2 thin films with incorporated nitrogen. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2007, 111, 1801–1808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. [186]
    Antony R P, Mathews T, Dash S, Tyagi A K. Kinetics and physicochemical process of photoinduced hydrophobic ? superhydrophilic switching of pristine and N-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013, 117, 6851–6860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. [187]
    Drelich J, Chibowski E. Superhydrophilic and superwetting surfaces: Definition and mechanisms of control. Langmuir, 2010, 26, 18621–18623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. [188]
    Daniel S, Chaudhury M K, Chen J C. Fast drop movements resulting from the phase change on a gradient surface. Science, 2001, 291, 633–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. [189]
    Beebe D J, Moore J S, Yu Q, Liu R H, Kraft M L, Jo B H, Devadoss C. Microfluidic tectonics: A comprehensive construction platform for microfluidic systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000, 97, 13488–13493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. [190]
    Zhai G Q, Ying L, Kang E T, Neoh K G. Surface and interface characterization of smart membranes. Surface and Interface Analysis, 2004, 36, 1048–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. [191]
    Yin Y, Guo N, Wang C, Rao Q. Alterable superhydrophobic–superhydrophilic wettability of fabric substrates decorated with Ion–TiO2 coating via ultraviolet radiation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2014, 53, 14322–14328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. [192]
    Fleischmann M, Hendra P J, Mcquillan A J. Raman spectra of pyridine adsorbed at a silver electrode. Chemical Physics Letters, 1974, 26, 163–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. [193]
    Kneipp J, Kneipp H, Kneipp K. SERS–a single-molecule and nanoscale tool for bioanalytics. Chemical Society Reviews, 2008, 37, 1052–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. [194]
    Lee H K, Lee Y H, Zhang Q, Phang I Y, Tan J M R, Cui Y, Ling X Y. Superhydrophobic surface-enhanced raman scattering platform fabricated by assembly of Ag nanocubes for trace molecular sensing. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, 5, 11409–11418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. [195]
    Tang H, Meng G, Huang Q, Zhang Z, Huang Z, Zhu C. Arrays of cone-shaped ZnO nanorods decorated with Ag nanoparticles as 3D surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates for rapid detection of trace polychlorinated biphenyls. Advanced Functional Materials, 2012, 22, 218–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. [196]
    Chang S, Combs Z A, Gupta M K, Davis R, Tsukruk V V. In situ growth of silver nanoparticles in porous membranes for surface-enhanced Raman scattering. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2010, 2, 3333–3339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. [197]
    Zhang B, Wang H, Lu L, Ai K, Zhang G, Cheng X. Large-area silver-coated silicon nanowire arrays for molecular sensing using surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy. Advanced Functional Materials, 2010, 18, 2348–2355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. [198]
    Yoon I, Kang T, Choi W, Kim J, Yoo Y, Joo S W, Park Q H, Ihee H, Kim B J. Single nanowire on a film as an efficient sers-active platform. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009, 131, 758–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. [199]
    Coluccio M L, Das G, Mecarini F, Gentile F, Pujia A, Bava L, Tallerico R, Candeloro P, Liberale C, Angelis F D, Fabrizio E D. Silver-based surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERSsubstrate fabrication using nanolithography and site selective electroless deposition. Microelectronic Engineering, 2009, 86, 1085–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. [200]
    Jiang X, Lai Y, Yang M, Yang H, Jiang W, Zhan J. Silver nanoparticle aggregates on copper foil for reliable quantitative SERS analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with a portable Raman spectrometer. Analyst, 2012, 137, 3995–4000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. [201]
    Yang Y, Li Z Y, Yamaguchi K, Tanemura M, Huang Z, Jiang D, Chen Y, Zhou F, Nogami M. Controlled fabrication of silver nanoneedles array for SERS and their application in rapid detection of narcotics. Nanoscale, 2012, 4, 2663–2669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. [202]
    Wang Y, Wang H, Wang Y, Shen Y, Xu S, Xu W. Plasmondriven dynamic response of a hierarchically structural silverdecorated nanorod array for sub-1nm nanogaps. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8, 15623–15629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. [203]
    Pillai Z S, Kamat P V. What factors control the size and shape of silver nanoparticles in the citrate ion reduction method? Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2004, 108, 945–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. [204]
    Wustholz K L, Henry A I, Natan M J, Freeman R G, Duyne R P V. Exploring single-molecule SERS and singlenanoparticle plasmon microscopy. Proceedings of SPIE 739–Plasmonics: Metallic Nanostructures and Their Optical Properties VII, 2009, 7394, 739403-1-739403-10.Google Scholar
  205. [205]
    Privett B J, Youn J, Hong S A, Lee J, Han J, Shin J H, Schoenfisch M H. Antibacterial fluorinated silica colloid superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir, 2011, 27, 9597–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. [206]
    Banerjee I, Pangule R C, Kane R S. Antifouling coatings: Recent developments in the design of surfaces that prevent fouling by proteins, bacteria, and marine organisms. Advanced Materials, 2011, 23, 690–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. [207]
    Chau N H, Bang L A, Buu N Q, Dung T T N, Ha H T, Quang D V. Some results in manufacturing of nanosilver and investigation of its application for disinfection. Advances in Natural Sciences, 2008, 9, 241–248.Google Scholar
  208. [208]
    Shi Q, Vitchuli N, Nowak J, Noar J, Caldwell J M, Breidt F, Bourham M, McCord M, Zhang X. One-step synthesis of silver nanoparticle-filled nylon nanofibers and their antibacterial properties. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2011, 21, 10330–10335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. [209]
    Senapati S, Srivastava S K, Singh S B, Mishra H N. Magnetic Ni/Ag core–shell nanostructure from prickly Ni nanowire precursor and its catalytic and antibacterial activity. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2012, 22, 6899–6906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. [210]
    Cui J, Hu C, Yang Y, Wu Y, Yang L, Wang Y, Liu Y, Jiang Z. Facile fabrication of carbonaceous nanospheres loaded with silver nanoparticles as antibacterial materials. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2012, 22, 8121–8126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. [211]
    Kim Y H, Lee D K, Cha H G, Kim C W, Kang Y S. Synthesis and characterization of antibacterial Ag-SiO2 nanocomposite. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2007, 111, 3629–3635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. [212]
    Roach P, Shirtcliffe N J, Farrar D, Perry C C. Quantification of surface-bound proteins by fluorometric assay: Comparison with quartz crystal microbalance and amido black assay. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2006, 110, 20572–20579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. [213]
    Koc Y, de Mello A J, Mchale G, Newton M I, Roach P, Shirtcliffe N J. Nano-scale superhydrophobicity: Suppression of protein adsorption and promotion of flow-induced detachment. Lab on a Chip, 2008, 8, 582–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. [214]
    Zhang X, Wang L, Levänen E. Superhydrophobic surfaces for the reduction of bacterial adhesion. RSC Advances, 2013, 3, 12003–12020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. [215]
    Heinonen S, Huttunen-Saarivirta E, Nikkanen J P, Raulio M, Priha O, Laakso J, Storgards E, Levänen E. Antibacterial properties and chemical stability of superhydrophobic silver-containing surface produced by sol–gel route. Colloids & Surfaces A, 2014, 453, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. [216]
    Che P, Liu W, Chang X, Wang A, Han Y. Multifunctional silver film with superhydrophobic and antibacterial properties. Nano Research, 2016, 9, 442–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. [217]
    Rai M, Yadav A, Gade A. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnology Advances, 2009, 27, 76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. [218]
    Choi O, Deng K, Kim N, Ross L, Surampalli R, Hu Z. The inhibitory effects of silver nanoparticles, silver ions, and silver chloride colloids on microbial growth. Water Research, 2008, 42, 3066–3074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. [219]
    Choi O, Hu Z. Size dependent and reactive oxygen species related nanosilver toxicity to nitrifying bacteria. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42, 4583–4588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. [220]
    Reyes-Vidal Y, Suarez-Rojas R, Ruiz C, Torres J, Stefan T, Méndez A, Trejo G. Electrodeposition, characterization, and antibacterial activity of zinc/silver particle composite coatings. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 342, 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. [221]
    Morones J R, Elechiguerra J L, Camacho A, Holt K, Kouri J B, Ramirez J T, Yacaman M J. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology, 2005, 16, 2346–2353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. [222]
    AshaRani P V, Low Kah Mun G, Hande M P, Valiyaveettil S. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in human cells. ACS Nano, 2008, 3, 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. [223]
    Koc Y, de Mello A J, Mchale G, Newton M I, Roach P, Shirtcliffe N J. Nano-scale superhydrophobicity: Suppression of protein adsorption and promotion of flow-induced detachment. Lab on a Chip, 2008, 8, 582–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. [224]
    Latthe S S, Sudhagar P, Devadoss A, Kumar A M, Liu S, Terashima C, Nakataa K, Fujishima A. A mechanically bendable superhydrophobic steel surface with self-cleaning and corrosion-resistant properties. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015, 3, 14263–14271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. [225]
    Li L, Zhang Y, Lei J, He J, Lv R, Li N, Pan F. A facile approach to fabricate superhydrophobic Zn surface and its effect on corrosion resistance. Corrosion Science, 2014, 85, 174–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. [226]
    Tao L, Chen S, Sha C, Tian J, Chang X, Yin Y. Corrosion behavior of super-hydrophobic surface on copper in seawater. Electrochimica Acta, 2007, 52, 8003–8007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. [227]
    Wang P, Zhang D, Qiu R, Wan Y, Wu J. Green approach to fabrication of a super-hydrophobic film on copper and the consequent corrosion resistance. Corrosion Science, 2014, 80, 366–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. [228]
    Ebert D, Bhushan B. Transparent, superhydrophobic, and wear-resistant coatings on glass and polymer substrates using SiO2, ZnO, and ITO nanoparticles. Langmuir, 2012, 28, 11391–11399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. [229]
    Deng Z Y, Wang W, Mao L H, Wang C F, Chen S. Versatile superhydrophobic and photocatalytic films generated from TiO2-SiO2@pdms and their applications on fabrics. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015, 2, 4178–4184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jilin University 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hubei Collaborative Innovation Centre for Advanced Organic Chemical Materials and Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for the Green Preparation and Application of Functional MaterialsHubei UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Solid Lubrication, Lanzhou Institute of Chemical PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesLanzhouChina

Personalised recommendations