Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Honeybee’s Protrusible Glossa is a Compliant Mechanism

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many biological structures can perform highly-dexterous actions by using dynamic surfaces. To deal with the contradictive demands of high feeding efficiency and low energy expenditure during nectar feeding, the glossal surface of a honeybee undergoes shape changes, in which glossal hairs erect together with segment elongation in a drinking cycle. In this paper, we extracted a transmission link embedded in the glossa from postmortem examination and found that the compliance of the intersegmental membranes provides more possibilities for this highly kinematic synchronicity. According to the morphing phenomena of honeybee’s glossa, we proposed a compliant mechanism model to predict the deformation behavior of honeybee considering elastic properties of the glossal intersegmental membranes. The increase of membrane stiffness may improve the capacity of elastic potential energy transfer, but will still result in the increase of mass. An index is introduced to evaluate the contradiction for optimizing structural parameters. This work may arouse new prospects for conceptual design of micro-mechanical systems equipped with bio-inspired compliant mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vincent J F V. Deployable structures in nature: Potential for biomimicking. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2000, 214, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson C V. Off like a shot: Scaling of ballistic tongue projection reveals extremely high performance in small chameleons. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6, 18625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Wassenbergh S, Strother J A, Flammang B E, Ferry-Graham L A, Aerts P. Extremely fast prey capture in pipefish is powered by elastic recoil. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2008, 5, 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Krenn H W, Plant J D, Szucsich N U. Mouthparts of flower-visiting insects. Arthropod Structure & Development, 2005, 34, 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim W, Bush J W M. Natural drinking strategies. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 705, 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee S J, Kim B H, Lee J Y. Experimental study on the fluid mechanics of blood sucking in the proboscis of a female mosquito. Journal of Biomechanics, 2009, 42, 857–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lehnert M S, Mulvane C P, Brothers A. Mouthpart separation does not impede butterfly feeding. Arthropod Structure & Development, 2014, 43, 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim W, Gilet T, Bush J W M. Optimal concentrations in nectar feeding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011, 108, 16618–16621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Paul J, Roces F. Fluid intake rates in ants correlate with their feeding habits. Journal of Insect Physiology, 2003, 49, 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moulton D E, Lessinnes T, O’Keeffe S, Dorfmann L, Goriely A. The elastic secrets of the chameleon tongue. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical Physical & Engineering Sciences, 2016, 472, 20160030.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Rico-Guevara A, Fan T H, Rubega M A. Hummingbird tongues are elastic micropumps. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Science, 2015, 282, 20151014.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harper C J, Swartz S M, Brainerd E L. Specialized bat tongue is a hemodynamic nectar mop. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110, 8852–8857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pernal S F, Currie R W. The influence of pollen quality on foraging behavior in honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2001, 51, 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu J, Zhu R, Yan S, Yang Y. Erection pattern and section-wise wettability of honeybee glossal hairs in nectar feeding. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2015, 218, 664–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao J, Wu J, Yan S. Erection mechanism of glossal hairs during honeybee feeding. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2015, 386, 62–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Snodgrass R E. Anatomy of the Honey Bee, Cornell University Press, London, UK, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu R, Lv H, Liu T, Yang Y, Wu J, Yan S. Feeding kinematics and nectar intake of the honey bee tongue. Journal of Insect Behavior, 2016, 29, 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li C, Wu J, Yang Y, Zhu R, Shao Z. Drag reduction in the mouthpart of a honeybee facilitated by galea ridges for nectar-dipping strategy. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2015, 12, 70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao C, Wu J, Yan S. Observations and temporal model of a honeybee’s hairy tongue in microfluid transport. Journal of Applied Physics, 2015, 118, 194701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Roberts T J, Azizi E. Flexible mechanisms: the diverse roles of biological springs in vertebrate movement. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2011, 214, 353–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen Y, Wang X, Ren H, Yin H, Jia S. Hierarchical dragonfly wing: Microstructure-biomechanical behavior relations. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2012, 9, 185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lichtwark G A, Bougoulias K, Wilson A M. Muscle fascicle and series elastic element length changes along the length of the human gastrocnemius during walking and running. Journal of Biomechanics, 2007, 40, 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moulton D E, Lessinnes T, O’Keeffe S, Dorfmann L, Goriely A. The elastic secrets of the chameleon tongue. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical Physical & Engineering Sciences, 2016, 472, 20160030.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Dickinson M H, Lighton J R B. Muscle efficiency and elastic potential energy storage in the flight motor of Drosophila. Science, 1995, 268, 87–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wager J C, Challis J H. Elastic energy within the human plantar aponeurosis contributes to arch shortening during the push-off phase of running. Journal of Biomechanics, 2016, 49, 704–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gronenberg W. Fast actions in small animals: Springs and click mechanisms. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 1996, 178, 727–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Higham T E, Irschick D J. Springs, steroids, and slingshots: The roles of enhancers and constraints in animal movement. Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 2013, 183, 583–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jensen B D, Howell L L, Salmon L G. Design of two-link, in-plane, bistable compliant micro-mechanisms. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1999, 121, 416–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vincent J F V, Wegst U G K. Design and mechanical properties of insect cuticle. Arthropod Structure & Development, 2004, 33, 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wegst U G K, Ashby M F. The mechanical efficiency of natural materials. Philosophical Magazine, 2004, 84, 2167–2186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Appel E, Heepe L, Lin C P, Gorb S N. Ultrastructure of dragonfly wing veins: Composite structure of fibrous material supplemented by resilin. Journal of Anatomy, 2015, 227, 561–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lobontiu N. Compliant Mechanisms: Design of Flexure Hinges, CRC press, Boca Raton, USA, 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China

    Yunqiang Yang, Rengao Zhu & Chuchu Li

  2. Division of Intelligent and Biomechanical Systems, State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Jianing Wu, Rengao Zhu & Shaoze Yan

Authors
  1. Yunqiang Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jianing Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rengao Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chuchu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shaoze Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yunqiang Yang or Shaoze Yan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Wu, J., Zhu, R. et al. The Honeybee’s Protrusible Glossa is a Compliant Mechanism. J Bionic Eng 14, 607–615 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60426-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60426-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation