Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 27–51 | Cite as

Cell and molecular biomechanics: perspectives and challenges

Article

Abstract

As an intriguing interdisciplinary research field, cell and molecular biomechanics is at the cutting edge of mechanics in general and biomechanics in particular. It has the potential to provide a quantitative understanding of how forces and deformation at tissue, cellular and molecular levels affect human health and disease. In this article, we review the recent advances in cell and molecular biomechanics, examine the available computational and experimental tools, and discuss important issues including protein deformation in mechanotransduction, cell deformation and constitutive behavior, cell adhesion and migration, and the associated models and theories. The opportunities and challenges in cell and molecular biomechanics are also discussed. We hope to provide readers a clear picture of the current status of this field, and to stimulate a broader interest in the applied mechanics community.

Key words

molecular biomechanics cell mechanics protein mechanics cell adhesion cell migration mechanotransduction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Nayak, G.D., Ratnayaka, H.S., Goodyear, R.J. and Richardson, G.P., Development of the hair bundle and mechanotransduction. The International Journal of Developmental Biology, 2007, 51: 597–608.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Zhu, C., Bao, G. and Wang, N., Cell mechanics: mechanical response, cell adhesion, and molecular deformation. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 2000, 2: 189–226.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Davies, P.F. and Tripathi, S.C., Mechanical stress mechanisms and the cell. An endothelial paradigm. Circulation Research, 1993, 72: 239–245.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Lehoux, S., Castier, Y. and Tedgui, A., Molecular mechanisms of the vascular responses to haemodynamic forces. Journal of Internal Medicine, 2006, 259: 381–392.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Engler, A.J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H.L. and Discher, D.E., Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell, 2006, 126: 677–689.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Kamm, R.D. and Kaazempur-Mofrad, M.R., On the molecular basis for mechanotransduction. Mechanics & chemistry of biosystems, 2004, 1: 201–209.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Vogel, V. and Sheetz, M., Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2006, 7: 265–275.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Mofrad, M.R.K. and Kamm, R.D., Cellular Mechanotransduction, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Gautam, M., Gojova, A. and Barakat, A.I., Flow-activated ion channels in vascular endothelium. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2006, 46: 277–284.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Suchyna, T. and Sachs, F., Mechanical and electrical properties of membranes from dystrophic and normal mouse muscle. Journal of Physiology, 2007, 581: 369–387.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Hudspeth, A.J., Choe, Y., Mehta, A.D. and Martin, P., Putting ion channels to work: mechanoelectrical transduction, adaptation, and amplification by hair cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 2000, 97: 11765–11772.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Hytonen, V.P. and Vogel, V., How force might activate talin’s vinculin binding sites: SMD reveals a structural mechanism. PLoS Computational Biology, 2008, 4: e24.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Lee, J.H., Huh, Y.M., Jun, Y.W., Seo, J.W., Jang, J.T., Song, H.T., Kim, S., Cho, E.J., Yoon, H.G., Suh, J.S. and Cheon, J., Artificially engineered magnetic nanoparticles for ultra-sensitive molecular imaging. Nature Medicine, 2007, 13: 95–99.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Mofrad, M.R., Golji, J., Abdul Rahim, N.A. and Kamm, R.D., Force-induced unfolding of the focal adhesion targeting domain and the influence of paxillin binding. Mechanics & Chemistry of Biosystems, 2004, 1: 253–265.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Kanchanawong, P., Shtengel, G., Pasapera, A.M., Ramko, E.B., Davidson, M.W., Hess, H.F. and Waterman, C.M., Nanoscale architecture of integrin-based cell adhesions. Nature, 2010, 468: 580–584.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Grashoff, C., Hoffman, B.D., Brenner, M.D., Zhou, R., Parsons, M., Yang, M.T., McLean, M.A., Sligar, S.G., Chen, C.S., Ha, T. and Schwartz, M.A., Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics. Nature, 2010, 466: 263–266.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Ingber, D.E., Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again. The FASEB Journal, 2006, 20: 811–827.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Howard, J., Mechanical signaling in networks of motor and cytoskeletal proteins. Annual Review of Biophysics, 2009, 38: 217–234.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Bao, G. and Suresh, S., Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials. Nature Materials, 2003, 2: 715–726.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Bao, G., Mechanics of biomolecules. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2002, 50: 2237–2274.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Alberts, B., Bray, D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K. and Watson, J.D., Molecular Biology of the Cell. Garland Publishing, New York, 2002.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Voet, D. and Voet, J.G., Biochemistry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Creighton, T.E., Proteins, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1993.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    McCammon, J.A., Gelin, B.R., Karplus, M. and Wolynes, P.G., The hinge-bending mode in lysozyme. Nature, 1976, 262: 325–326.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Rief, M., Gautel, M., Oesterhelt, F., Fernandez, J.M. and Gaub, H., Reversible unfolding of individual titin immunoglobulin domains by AFM. Science, 1997, 276: 1109–1112.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Kellermayer, M.S.Z., Smith, S.B., Granzier, H.L. and Bustamante, C., Folding-unfolding transitions in single titin molecules characterized with laser tweezers. Science, 1997, 276: 1112–1116.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Tskhovrebova, L., Trinnick, J., Sleep, J.A. and Simmons, R.M., Elasticity and unfolding of single molecules of the giant muscle protein titin. Nature, 1997, 387: 308–312.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Oberhauser, A.F., Marszalek, P.E., Erickson, H.P. and Fernandez, J.M., The molecular elasticity of the extracellular matrix protein tenascin. Nature, 1998, 393: 181–185.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Krammer, A., Lu, H., Isralewitz, B., Schulten, K. and Vogel, V., Forced unfolding of the fibronectin type III module reveals a tensile molecular recognition switch. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 1999, 96: 1351–1356.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Ohashi, T., Kiehart, D.P. and Ericson, H., Dynamics and elasticity of the fibronectin matrix in living cell culture visualized by fibronectin-green fluorescent protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 1999, 96: 2153–2158.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Craig, D., Krammer, A., Schulten, K. and Vogel, V., Comparison of the early stages of forced unfolding for fibronectin type III modules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 2001, 98: 5590–5595.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Vogel, V., Thomas, W.E., Craig, D.W., Krammer, A. and Baneyx, G., Structural insights into the mechanical regulation of molecular recognition sites. Trends in Biotechnology, 2001, 19: 416–423.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Puklin-Faucher, E., Gao, M., Schulten, K. and Vogel, V., How the headpiece hinge angle is opened: New insights into the dynamics of integrin activation. Journal of Cell Biology, 2006, 175: 349–360.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Vogel, V. and Sheetz, M.P., Cell fate regulation by coupling mechanical cycles to biochemical signaling pathways. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 2009, 21: 38–46.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Puklin-Faucher, E. and Vogel, V., Integrin activation dynamics between the RGD-binding site and the headpiece hinge. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2009, 284: 36557–36568.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Kong, F., García, A.J., Mould, A.P., Humphries, M.J. and Zhu, C., Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand. Journal of Cell Biology, 2009, 185: 1275–1284.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Ruggeri, Z.M., Von Willebrand factor. Current Opinion in Hematology, 2003, 10: 142–149.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Johnson, C.P., Tang, H.Y., Carag, C., Speicher, D.W. and Discher, D.E, Forced unfolding of proteins within cells. Science, 2007, 317: 663–666.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Soto, C., Protein misfolding and disease; protein refolding and therapy. FEBS Letters, 2001, 498: 204–207.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Fu, J., Wang, Y.K., Yang, M.T., Desai, R.A., Yu, X., Liu, Z. and Chen, C.S., Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates. Nature Methods, 2010, 7: 733–736.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Galbraith, C.G. and Sheetz, M.P., A micromachined device provides a new bend on fibroblast traction forces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 1997, 94: 9114–9118.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Tan, J.L., Tien, J., Pirone, D.M., Gray, D.S., Bhadriraju, K. and Chen, C.S., Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 2003, 100: 1484–1489.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    Legant, W.R., Miller, J.S., Blakely, B.L., Cohen, D.M., Genin, G.M. and Chen, C.S., Measurement of mechanical tractions exerted by cells in three-dimensional matrices. Nature Methods, 2010, 7: 969–971.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    McGarry, J.P., Murphy, B.P. and McHugh, P.E., Computational mechanics modelling of cell-substrate contact during cyclic substrate deformation. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2005, 53: 2597–2637.MATHGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    Chen, S. and Gao, H., Non-slipping adhesive contact of an elastic cylinder on stretched substrates. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 2006, 462: 211–228.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    Guilak, F. and Mow, V.C., The mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite element model of cell-matrix interactions in articular cartilage. Journal of Biomechanics, 2000, 33: 1663–1673.Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    Leipzig, N.D. and Athanasiou, K.A., Unconfined creep compression of chondrocytes. Journal of Biomechanics, 2005, 38: 77–85.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    Caille, N., Thoumine, O., Tardy, Y. and Meister, J.J., Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. Journal of Biomechanics, 2002, 35: 177–187.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    Satcher, R.L. and Dewey, C.F., Theoretical estimates of mechanical properties of the endothelial cell cytoskeleton. Biophysical Journal, 1996, 71: 109–118.Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    Stamenovic, D. and Ingber, D.E., Models of cytoskeletal mechanics of adherent cells. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 2002, 1: 95–108.Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    Ingber, D.E., Cellular tensegrity — Defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton. Journal of Cell Science, 1993, 104: 613–627.Google Scholar
  52. [52]
    Ingber, D.E. and Tensegrity, I., Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. Journal of Cell Science, 2003, 116: 1157–1173.Google Scholar
  53. [53]
    Canadas, P., Wendling-Mansuy, S. and Isabey, D., Frequency response of a viscoelastic tensegrity model: Structural rearrangement contribution to cell dynamics. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering — Transactions of the ASME, 2006, 128: 487–495.Google Scholar
  54. [54]
    Sultan, C., Stamenovic, D. and Ingber, D.E., A computational tensegrity model predicts dynamic rheological behaviors in living cells. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2004, 32: 520–530.Google Scholar
  55. [55]
    Maurin, B., Canadas, P., Baudriller, H., Montcourrier, P. and Bettache, N., Mechanical model of cytoskeleton structuration during cell adhesion and spreading. Journal of Biomechanics, 2008, 41: 2036–2041.Google Scholar
  56. [56]
    Luo, Y., Xu, X., Lele, T., Kumar, S. and Ingber, D.E., A multi-modular tensegrity model of an actin stress fiber. Journal of Biomechanics, 2008, 41: 2379–2387.Google Scholar
  57. [57]
    Na, S., Meininger, G.A. and Humphrey, J.D., A theoretical model for F-actin remodeling in vascular smooth muscle cells subjected to cyclic stretch. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2007, 246: 87–99.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  58. [58]
    Moreo, P., Garcia-Aznar, J.M. and Doblar, M., Modeling mechanosensing and its effect on the migration and proliferation of adherent cells. Acta Biomaterialia, 2008, 4: 613–621.Google Scholar
  59. [59]
    Besser, A. and Schwarz, U.S., Coupling biochemistry and mechanics in cell adhesion: a model for inhomogeneous stress fiber contraction. New Journal of Physics, 2007, 9: 425.Google Scholar
  60. [60]
    Matthew, R.S. and Ben, O.S., Kinetics of stress fibers. New Journal of Physics, 2008(2): 025002.Google Scholar
  61. [61]
    Deshpande, V.S., McMeeking, R.M. and Evans, A.G., A bio-chemo-mechanical model for cell contractility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 2006, 103: 14015–14020.Google Scholar
  62. [62]
    Wei, Z., Deshpande, V.S., McMeeking, R.M. and Evans, A.G., Analysis and interpretation of stress fiber organization in cells subject to cyclic stretch. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2008, 130 (3): 031009–9.Google Scholar
  63. [63]
    Pathak, A., Deshpande, V.S., McMeeking, R.M. and Evans, A.G., The simulation of stress fibre and focal adhesion development in cells on patterned substrates. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 2008, 5: 507–524.Google Scholar
  64. [64]
    Kim, J.S. and Sun, S.X., Continuum modeling of forces in growing viscoelastic cytoskeletal networks. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2009, 256: 596–606.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  65. [65]
    N’Dri, N.A., Shyy, W. and Tran-Soy-Tay, R., Computational modeling of cell adhesion and movement using a continuum-kinetics approach. Biophysical Journal, 2003, 85: 2273–2286.Google Scholar
  66. [66]
    Rubinstein, B., Jacobson, K. and Mogilner, A., Multiscale two-dimensional modeling of a motile simple-shaped cell. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 2005, 3: 413–439.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  67. [67]
    Milan, J.L., Wendling-Mansuy, S., Jean, M. and Chabrand, P., Divided medium-based model for analyzing the dynamic reorganization of the cytoskeleton during cell deformation. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 2007, 6: 373–390.Google Scholar
  68. [68]
    Michael, C.F., Amit, B., Mariana, B.G. and Peter, J.B., Finite-element stress analysis of a multicomponent model of sheared and focally-adhered endothelial cells. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2007, 35: 208–223.Google Scholar
  69. [69]
    Fernandez, P., Pullarkat, P.A. and Ott, A., A master relation defines the nonlinear viscoelasticity of single fibroblasts. Biophysical Journal, 2006, 90: 3796–3805.Google Scholar
  70. [70]
    Kasza, K.E., Rowat, A.C., Liu, J., Angelini, T.E., Brangwynne, C.P., Koenderink, G.H. and Weitz, D.A., The cell as a material. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 2007, 19: 101–107.Google Scholar
  71. [71]
    Jiang, G.Y., Huang, A.H., Cai, Y.F., Tanase, M. and Sheetz, M.P., Rigidity sensing at the leading edge through alpha(v)beta(3) integrins and RPTP alpha. Biophysical Journal, 2006, 90: 1804–1809.Google Scholar
  72. [72]
    Darling, E.M., Zauscher, S. and Guilak, F., Viscoelastic properties of zonal articular chondrocytes measured by atomic force microscopy. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2006, 14: 571–579.Google Scholar
  73. [73]
    Mathur, A.B., Inge, E.W., Reichert, W.M. and Truskey, G.A., Examination of the effect of stress on streptavidin-biotin/integrin-fibronectin bonds at the cell-substrate interface with the AFM-TIRFM. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, 2001, 221: U347–U348.Google Scholar
  74. [74]
    Titushkin, I. and Cho, M., Modulation of cellular mechanics during osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biophysical Journal, 2007, 93: 3693–3702.Google Scholar
  75. [75]
    Gardel M.L., Shin, J.H., MacKintosh, F.C., Mahadevan, L., Matsudaira, P. and Weitz, D.A., Elastic behavior of cross-linked and bundled actin networks. Science, 2004, 304: 1301–1305.Google Scholar
  76. [76]
    Palmer, J.S. and Boyce, M.C., Constitutive modeling of the stress-strain behavior of F-actin filament networks. Acta Biomaterialia, 2008, 4: 597–612.Google Scholar
  77. [77]
    Lu, L., Oswald, S.J., Ngu, H. and Yin, F.C.P., Mechanical properties of actin stress fibers in living cells. Biophysical Journal, 2008, 95: 6060–6071.Google Scholar
  78. [78]
    Stamenovic, D., Rosenblatt, N., Montoya-Zavala, M., Matthews, B.D., Hu, S., Suki, B., Wang, N. and Ingber, D.E., Rheological behavior of living cells is timescale-dependent. Biophysical Journal, 2007, 93: L39–41.Google Scholar
  79. [79]
    Deng, L.H., Trepat, X., Butler, J.P., Millet, E., Morgan, K.G., Weitz, D.A. and Fredberg, J.J., Fast and slow dynamics of the cytoskeleton. Nature Materials, 2006, 5: 636–640.Google Scholar
  80. [80]
    Chowdhury, F., Na, S., Collin, O., Tay, B., Li, F., Tanaka, T., Leckband, D.E. and Wang, N., Is cell rheology governed by nonequilibrium-to-equilibrium transition of noncovalent bonds? Biophysical Journal, 2008, 95: 5719–5727.Google Scholar
  81. [81]
    Jaasma, M.J., Jackson, W.M., Tang, R.Y. and Keaveny, T.M., Adaptation of cellular mechanical behavior to mechanical loading for osteoblastic cells. Journal of Biomechanics, 2007, 40: 1938–1945.Google Scholar
  82. [82]
    Li, Q.S., Lee, G.Y.H., Ong, C.N. and Lim, C.T., AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2008, 374: 609–613.Google Scholar
  83. [83]
    Lekka, M., Laidler, P., Gil, D., Lekki, J., Stachura, Z. and Hrynkiewicz, A.Z., Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy. European Biophysics Journal with Biophysics Letters, 1999, 28: 312–316.Google Scholar
  84. [84]
    Suresh, S., Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. Acta Biomaterialia, 2007, 3: 413–438.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  85. [85]
    Ward, K.A., Li, W.I., Zimmer, S. and Davis, T., Viscoelastic properties of transformed-cells-role in tumor-cell progression and metastasis formation. Biorheology, 1991, 28: 301–313.Google Scholar
  86. [86]
    Geiger, B. and Bershadsky, A., Assembly and mechanosensory function of focal contacts. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 2001, 13: 584–592.Google Scholar
  87. [87]
    Wayner, E.A., Orlando, R.A. and Cheresh, D.A., Integrins alpha v beta 3 and alpha v beta 5 contribute to cell attachment to vitronectin but differentially distribute on the cell surface. Journal of Cell Biology, 1991, 113: 919–929.Google Scholar
  88. [88]
    Zhu, C., Kinetics and mechanics of cell adhesion. Journal of Biomechanics, 2000, 33: 23–33.Google Scholar
  89. [89]
    Evans, E.A., Detailed mechanics of membrane-membrane adhesion and separation. II. Discrete kinetically trapped molecular cross-bridges. Biophysical Journal, 1985, 48: 185–192.Google Scholar
  90. [90]
    Evans, E.A., Detailed mechanics of membrane-membrane adhesion and separation. I. Continuum of molecular cross-bridges. Biophysical Journal, 1985, 48: 175–183.Google Scholar
  91. [91]
    Ward, M.D. and Hammer, D.A., A theoretical analysis for the effect of focal contact formation on cellsubstrate attachment strength. Biophysical Journal, 1993, 64: 936–959.Google Scholar
  92. [92]
    Ward, M.D., Dembo, M. and Hammer, D.A., Kinetics of cell detachment: peeling of discrete receptor clusters. Biophysical Journal, 1994, 67: 2522–2534.Google Scholar
  93. [93]
    Kong, D., Ji, B. and Dai, L., Nonlinear mechanical modeling of cell adhesion. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2008, 250: 75–84.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  94. [94]
    Chen, B. and Gao, H.J., Mechanical principle of enhancing cell-substrate adhesion via pre-tension in the cytoskeleton. Biophysical Journal, 2010, 98: 2154–2162.Google Scholar
  95. [95]
    Marshall, B.T., Long, M., Piper, J.W., Yago, T., McEver, R.P. and Zhu, C., Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules. Nature, 2003, 423: 190–193.Google Scholar
  96. [96]
    Bershadsky, A.D., Balaban, N, Q. and Geiger, B., Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 2003, 19: 677–695.Google Scholar
  97. [97]
    Riveline, D., Zamir, E., Balaban, N.Q., Schwarz, U.S., Ishizaki, T., Narumiya, S., Kam, Z., Geiger, B. and Bershadsky, A.D., Focal contacts as mechanosensors: externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDia1-dependent and rock-independent mechanism. Journal of Cell Biology, 2001, 153: 1175–1186.Google Scholar
  98. [98]
    Balaban, N.Q., Schwarz, U.S., Riveline, D., Goichberg, P., Tzur, G., Sabanay, I., Mahalu, D., Safran, S.A., Bershadsky, A., Addadi, L. and Geiger, B., Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nature Cell Biology, 2001, 3: 466–472.Google Scholar
  99. [99]
    Buck, R.C., Reorientation response of cells to repeated stretch and recoil of the substratum. Experimental Cell Research, 1980, 127: 470–474.Google Scholar
  100. [100]
    Dartsch, P. and Hammerle, H., Orientation response of arterial smooth muscle cells to mechanical stimulation. European Journal of Cell Biology, 1986, 41: 339–346.Google Scholar
  101. [101]
    Jungbauer, S., Gao, H., Spatz, J.P. and Kemkemer, R., Two characteristic regimes in frequency-dependent dynamic reorientation of fibroblasts on cyclically stretched substrates. Biophysical Journal, 2008, 95: 3470–3478.Google Scholar
  102. [102]
    Kaunas, R., Nguyen, P., Usami, S. and Chien, S., From the cover: cooperative effects of Rho and mechanical stretch on stress fiber organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 2005, 102: 15895–15900.Google Scholar
  103. [103]
    Moretti, M., Prina-Mello, A., Reid, A.J., Barron, V. and Prendergast, P.J., Endothelial cell alignment on cyclically-stretched silicone surfaces. Journal of Materials Science — Materials in Medicine, 2004, 15: 1159–1164.Google Scholar
  104. [104]
    Neidlinger-Wilke, C., Grood, E.S., Wang, J.H.C., Brand, R.A. and Claes, L., Cell alignment is induced by cyclic changes in cell length: studies of cells grown in cyclically stretched substrates. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2001, 19: 286–293.Google Scholar
  105. [105]
    Neidlinger-Wilke, C., Wilke, H.-J. and Claes, L., Cyclic stretching of human osteoblasts affects proliferation and metabolism: A new experimental method and its application. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2005, 12: 70–78.Google Scholar
  106. [106]
    Wang, H.C., Ip, W., Boissy, R. and Grood, E.S., Cell orientation response to cyclically deformed substrates: Experimental validation of a cell model. Journal of Biomechanics, 1995, 28: 1543–1552.Google Scholar
  107. [107]
    Nicolas, A., Geiger, B. and Safran, S.A., Cell mechanosensitivity controls the anisotropy of focal adhesions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 2004, 101: 12520–12525.Google Scholar
  108. [108]
    Nicolas, A. and Safran, S.A., Limitation of cell adhesion by the elasticity of the extracellular matrix. Biophysical Journal, 2006, 91: 61–73.Google Scholar
  109. [109]
    Nicolas, A., Besser, A. and Safran, S.A., Dynamics of cellular focal adhesions on deformable substrates: Consequences for cell force microscopy. Biophysical Journal, 2008, 95: 527–539.Google Scholar
  110. [110]
    Shemesh, T., Geiger, B., Bershadsky, A.D. and Kozlov, M.M., Focal adhesions as mechanosensors: A physical mechanism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 2005, 102: 12383–12388.Google Scholar
  111. [111]
    De, R., Zemel, A. and Safran, S.A., Dynamics of cell orientation. Nature Physics, 2007, 3: 655–659.Google Scholar
  112. [112]
    De, R. and Safran, S.A., Dynamical theory of active cellular response to external stress. Physical Review E, 2008, 78 (3): 031923–18.Google Scholar
  113. [113]
    Qian, J., Wang, J. and Gao, H., Lifetime and strength of adhesive molecular bond clusters between elastic media. Langmuir, 2008, 24: 1262–1270.Google Scholar
  114. [114]
    Wang, J. and Gao, H., Clustering instability in adhesive contact between elastic solids via diffusive molecular bonds. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2008, 56: 251–266.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  115. [115]
    Kong, D., Ji, B. and Dai, L., Stability of adhesion clusters and cell reorientation under lateral cyclic tension. Biophysical Journal, 2008, 95: 4034–4044.Google Scholar
  116. [116]
    Ji, B., Kong, D. and Dai, L., Dynamics of adhesion cluster and cell reorientation under lateral cyclic loading. Biorheology, 2008, 45: 96–97.Google Scholar
  117. [117]
    Kong, D., Ji, B. and Dai, L., Stabilizing to disruptive transition of focal adhesion response to mechanical forces. Journal of Biomechanics, 2010, 43: 2524–2529.Google Scholar
  118. [118]
    Geiger, B., Spatz, J.P. and Bershadsky, A.D., Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2009, 10: 21–33.Google Scholar
  119. [119]
    Puklin-Faucher, E. and Sheetz, M.P., The mechanical integrin cycle. Journal of Cell Science, 2009, 122: 179–186.Google Scholar
  120. [120]
    Bershadsky, A., Kozlov, M. and Geiger, B., Adhesion-mediated mechanosensitivity: a time to experiment, and a time to theorize. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 2006, 18: 472–481.Google Scholar
  121. [121]
    Chen, C.S., Mrksich, M., Huang, S., Whitesides, G.M. and Ingber, D.E., Geometric control of cell life and death. Science, 1997, 276: 1425–1428.Google Scholar
  122. [122]
    DiMilla, P.A., Barbee, K. and Lauffenburger, D.A., Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed. Biophysical Journal, 1991, 60: 15–37.Google Scholar
  123. [123]
    Sthanou, A., Mylona, E., Chaplain, M. and Tracqui, P., A computational model of cell migration coupling the growth of focal adhesions with oscillatory cell protrusions. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2008, 253: 701–716.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  124. [124]
    Satulovsky, J., Lui, R. and Wang, Y.-L., Exploring the control circuit of cell migration by mathematical modeling. Biophysical Journal, 2008, 94: 3671–3683.Google Scholar
  125. [125]
    Wolf, K., Mazo, I., Leung, H., Engelke, K., von Andrian, U.H., Deryugina, E.I., Strongin, A.Y., Brocker, E.B. and Friedl, P., Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration: mesenchymal-amoeboid transition after blocking of pericellular proteolysis. Journal of Cell Biology, 2003, 160: 267–277.Google Scholar
  126. [126]
    Hu, K., Ji, L., Applegate, K.T., Danuser, G. and Waterman-Storer, C.M., Differential transmission of actin motion within focal adhesions. Science, 2007, 315: 111–115.Google Scholar
  127. [127]
    Lan, Y. and Papoian, G.A., The stochastic dynamics of filopodial growth. Biophysical Journal, 2008, 94: 3839–3852.Google Scholar
  128. [128]
    Chan, C.E. and Odde, D.J., Traction dynamics of filopodia on compliant substrates. Science, 2008, 322: 1687–1691.Google Scholar
  129. [129]
    Guo, W.-H. and Wang, Y.-L., Retrograde fluxes of focal adhesion proteins in response to cell migration and mechanical signals. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 2007, 18: 4519–4527.Google Scholar
  130. [130]
    Mogilner, A., Mathematics of cell motility: have we got its number? Journal of Mathematical Biology, 2009, 58: 105–134.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  131. [131]
    Wyckoff, J.B., Pinner, S.E., Gschmeissner, S., Condeelis, J.S. and Sahai, E., ROCK- and myosin-dependent matrix deformation enables protease-independent tumor-cell invasion in vivo. Current Biology, 2006, 16: 1515–1523.Google Scholar
  132. [132]
    Sahai, E. and Marshall, C.J., Differing modes of tumour cell invasion have distinct requirements for Rho/ROCK signalling and extracellular proteolysis. Nature Cell Biology, 2003, 5: 711–719.Google Scholar
  133. [133]
    Croft, D.R. and Olson, M. F., Regulating the conversion between rounded and elongated modes of cancer cell movement. Cancer Cell, 2008, 14: 349–351.Google Scholar
  134. [134]
    Sanz-Moreno, V., Gadea, G., Ahn, J., Paterson, H., Marra, P., Pinner, S., Sahai, E. and Marshall, C.J., Rac activation and inactivation control plasticity of tumor cell movement. Cell, 2008, 135: 510–523.Google Scholar
  135. [135]
    Fata, J.E., Werb, Z. and Bissell, M.J., Regulation of mammary gland branching morphogenesis by the extracellular matrix and its remodeling enzymes. Breast Cancer Research, 2003, 6: 1–11.Google Scholar
  136. [136]
    Oikonomou, N., Harokopos, V., Zalevsky, J., Valavanis, C., Kotanidou, A., Szymkowski, D.E., Kollias, G. and Aidinis, V., Soluble TNF mediates the transition from pulmonary inflammation to fibrosis. Plos One, 2006, 1: e108.Google Scholar
  137. [137]
    Berk, B.C., Fujiwara, K. and Lehoux, S., ECM remodeling in hypertensive heart disease. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2007, 117: 568–575.Google Scholar
  138. [138]
    Plant, A.L., Bhadriraju, K., Spurlin, T.A. and Elliott, J.T., Cell response to matrix mechanics: Focus on collagen. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) — Molecular Cell Research, 2009, 1793: 893–902.Google Scholar
  139. [139]
    Saha, K., Keung, A.J., Irwin, E.F., Li, Y., Little, L., Schaffer, D.V. and Healy, K.E., Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior. Biophysical Journal, 2008, 95: 4426–4438.Google Scholar
  140. [140]
    Willits, R.K. and Skornia, S.L., Effect of collagen gel stiffness on neurite extension. Journal of Biomaterials Science — Polymer Edition, 2004, 15: 1521–1531.Google Scholar
  141. [141]
    Leach, J.B., Brown, X.Q., Jacot, J.G., DiMilla, P.A. and Wong, J.Y., Neurite outgrowth and branching of PC12 cells on very soft substrates sharply decreases below a threshold of substrate rigidity. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2007, 4: 26–34.Google Scholar
  142. [142]
    Thomas, T.W. and DiMilla, P.A., Spreading and motility of human glioblastoma cells on sheets of silicone rubber depend on substratum compliance. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2000, 38: 360–370.Google Scholar
  143. [143]
    Wozniak, M.A., Desai, R., Solski, P.A., Der, C.J. and Keely, P.J., ROCK-generated contractility regulates breast epithelial cell differentiation in response to the physical properties of a three-dimensional collagen matrix. Journal of Cell Biology, 2003, 163: 583–595.Google Scholar
  144. [144]
    King, C., Dembo, M. and Hammer, D.A., Cell-cell mechanical communication through compliant substrates. Biophysical Journal, 2008, 95: 6044–6051.Google Scholar
  145. [145]
    Solon, J., Levental, I., Sengupta, K., Georges, P.C. and Janmey, P.A., Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. Biophysical Journal, 2007, 93: 4453–4461.Google Scholar
  146. [146]
    Lo, C.-M., Wang, H.-B., Dembo, M. and Wang, Y.-L., Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophysical Journal, 2000, 79: 144–152.Google Scholar
  147. [147]
    Ulrich, T.A., Pardo, E.M.D. and Kumar, S., The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. Cancer Research, 2009, 69: 4167–4174.Google Scholar
  148. [148]
    Cheng, C.-M., Steward Jr, R.L. and LeDuc, P.R., Probing cell structure by controlling the mechanical environment with cell-substrate interactions. Journal of Biomechanics, 2009, 42 187–192.Google Scholar
  149. [149]
    Jiang, X.Y., Takayama, S., Qian, X.P., Ostuni, E., Wu, H.K., Bowden, N., LeDuc, P., Ingber, D.E. and White-sides, G.M., Controlling mammalian cell spreading and cytoskeletal arrangement with conveniently fabricated continuous wavy features on poly(dimethylsiloxane). Langmuir, 2002, 18: 3273–3280.Google Scholar
  150. [150]
    Selhuber-Unkel, C., Lopez-Garcia, M., Kessler, H. and Spatz, J.P., Cooperativity in adhesion cluster formation during initial cell adhesion. Biophysical Journal, 2008, 95: 5424–5431.Google Scholar
  151. [151]
    Cavalcanti-Adam, E.A., Volberg, T., Micoulet, A., Kessler, H., Geiger, B. and Spatz, J.P., Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. Biophysical Journal, 2007, 92: 2964–2974.Google Scholar
  152. [152]
    Yamada, K.M., Pankov, R. and Cukierman, E., Dimensions and dynamics in integrin function. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 2003, 36: 959–966.Google Scholar
  153. [153]
    Agoram, B., Barocas, V.H., Coupled macroscopic and microscopic scale modeling of fibrillar tissues and tissue equivalents. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering — Transactions of the ASME, 2001, 123: 362–369.Google Scholar
  154. [154]
    Pedersen, J.A., Boschetti, F. and Swartz, M.A., Effects of extracellular fiber architecture on cell membrane shear stress in a 3D fibrous matrix. Journal of Biomechanics, 2007, 40: 1484–1492.Google Scholar
  155. [155]
    Wang, J.H., Goldschmidt-Clermont, P. and Yin, F.C., Contractility affects stress fiber remodeling and reorientation of endothelial cells subjected to cyclic mechanical stretching. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2000, 28: 1165–1171.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics and Technology 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied MechanicsBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical EngineeringGeorgia Institute of Technology and Emory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations