Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 220–230 | Cite as

Yield Criterion in Plastic-Damage Models for Concrete

Article

Abstract

A class of plastic-damage models for concrete require an unambiguous definition of cohesion in the yield criteria. For this reason, the Lubliner yield criterion has been adopted by many investigators and the commercial FE program Abaqus. As is well known, this criterion has achieved great success especially in plane stress states. In this paper, we are trying to extend it to triaxial compression stress states. First, a major limitation of the Lubliner criterion is analyzed. Then, a revised version of the Lubliner criterion is proposed, which shows appropriate properties over a wide range of stress states often encountered in engineering structures, and the predicted failure envelopes fit well with experimental data. For the concrete damaged plasticity model in Abaqus, a calibration strategy is suggested for uniformly confined concrete.

Key words

plastic-damage model Lubliner yield criterion triaxial compression concrete damaged plasticity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Lubliner, J., Oliver, J., Oller, S. and Oñate, E., A plastic-damage model for concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1989, 25(3): 229–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Luccioni, B., Oller, S. and Danesi, R., Coupled plastic-damaged model. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1996, 129(1–2): 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Lee, J. and Fenves, G.L., Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 1998, 124(8): 892–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Wu, J.Y., Damage Energy Release Rate-based Elastoplastic Damage Constitutive Model for Concrete and Its Application to Nonlinear Analysis of Structures. Shanghai, China: Department of Building Engineering, Tongji University, 2004 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Wu, J.Y., Li, J. and Faria, R., An energy release rate-based plastic-damage model for concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2006, 43(3): 583–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Cicekli, U., Voyiadjis, G.Z. and Abu Al-Rub, R.K., A plasticity and anisotropic damage model for plain concrete. International Journal of Plasticity, 2007, 23(10–11): 1874–1900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Voyiadjis, G.Z., Taqieddin, Z.N. and Kattan, P.I., Anisotropic damage-plasticity model for concrete. International Journal of Plasticity, 2008, 24(10): 1946–1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Abaqus Analysis User’s Manual, version 6.9. Providence, RI: Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., 2009.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Abaqus Theory Manual, version 6.9. Providence, RI: Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., 2009.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Lee, J., Theory and Implementation of Plastic-damage Model for Concrete Structures under Cyclic and Dynamic Loading. Berkeley, CA: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Lee, J., and Fenves, G.L., A plastic-damage concrete model for earthquake analysis of dams. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1998, 27: 937–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Abaqus Verification Manual, version 6.9. Providence, RI: Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., 2009.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Lundqvist,J., Nordin,H., Täljsten, B. and Olofsson,T., Numerical analysis of concrete beams strengthened with CFRP — A case study of anchorage lengths. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Bond Behaviour of FRP in Structures, Hong Kong, China, 2005.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Jankowiak, T. and Lodygowski, T., Identification of parameters of concrete damage plasticity constitutive model. Foundations of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2005, 6: 53–69.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Zhang, J., Wang, Q.Y., Hu, S.Y. and Wang, C.J., Parametric verification of concrete damaged plasticity model of Abaqus. Building Structures, 2008, 38(8): 127–130 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Wang, D.S., Li, Z.S., Li, C.M., Jiang, W.W., Wang, G.J. and Liao, Y., Nonlinear elasto-plastic time history analysis for complex structures in ABAQUS. Building Structures, 2007, 37(5): 92–96 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Lee, S., Nonlinear dynamic earthquake analysis of skyscrapers. In: 8th World Congress of Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2008.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Long, Y.C., Zhang, C.H. and Feng, J., Numerical simulation of reinforcement strengthening for high-arch dams to resist strong earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2008, 37(15): 1739–1761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Pan, J.W., Zhang, C.H., Wang, J.T. and Xu, Y.J., Seismic damage-cracking analysis of arch dams using different earthquake input mechanisms. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2009, 52(2): 518–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Zhang, C.H. and Zhang, Y.L., Nonlinear dynamic analysis of the Three Gorges Projects powerhouse excited by pressure fluctuation. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A, 2009, 10(9): 1231–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Liu, W., Research on Mechanism of Concrete-filled Steel Tubes Subjected to Local Compression. Fuzhou, China: School of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, 2005 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Han, L.H., Yao, G.H. and Tao, Z., Performance of concrete-filled thin-walled steel tubes under pure torsion. Thin-walled Structures, 2007, 45: 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Li,J. and Wu,J.Y., Energy-based CDM model for nonlinear analysis of confined concrete structures. In: International Symposium on Confined Concrete (ISCC), Changsha, China, 2004.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Mills, L.L. and Zimmerman, R.M., Compressive strength of plain concrete under multiaxial loading conditions. Journal of American Concrete Institute, 1970, 67–10: 802–807.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Schichert,G. and Winkler,H., Results of test concerning to multiaxial compressive stresses. In: Deutscher Ausschuss für Stahlbeton, Bulletin 277, Berlin, Germany, 1977.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Chinn, J. and Zimmerman, R.M., Behavior of plain concrete under various high triaxial compression loading conditions. Technical Report No. WL TR 64–163 (AD 468460). NM: Air Force Weapons Laboratory, 1965.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Voyiadjis, G.Z. and Kattan, P.I., Advances in Damage Mechanics: Metals and Metals Matrix Composites. Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier, 1999.MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Voyiadjis, G.Z. and Kattan, P.I., Advances in Damage Mechanics: Metals and Metal Matrix Composites, with an Introduction to Fabric Tensors, second ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier, 2006.MATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Li, Q. and Ansari, F., Mechanics of damage and constitutive relationships for high-strength concrete in triaxial compression. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 1999, 125(1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Launay, P. and Gachon, H., Strain and ultimate strength of concrete under triaxial stress. ACI Special Publication, 1971, 34: 13–43.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Oller, S., Onate, E., Oliver, J. and Lubliner, J., Finite element nonlinear analysis of concrete structures using a plastic-damage model. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1990, 35: 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Koksal, H.O., Doran, B. and Turgay, T., A practical approach for modeling FRP wrapped concrete columns. Construction and Building Materials, 2009, 23: 1429–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics and Technology 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and MechanicsHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations