Advertisement

Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 391–398 | Cite as

Continuum Void Nucleation Model for Al-Mg Alloy Sheet Based on Measured Particle Distribution

  • C. J. Butcher
  • Zengtao Chen
Article

Abstract

Void nucleation within measured particle fields of an aluminum alloy is investigated to develop a continuum nucleation model which reflects nucleation at the individual particle scale. A nucleation model for heterogeneous particle distributions is synchronized with the continuum model of Chu and Needleman using the average nucleation strain. The parameters in the continuum model are identified from the particle fields and are evaluated over the range of stress states observed in sheet metal forming. The synchronized continuum nucleation model achieves very good agreement with the nucleation trends for three measured particle fields in uniaxial tension, plane strain, and equal-biaxial tension.

Key words

void nucleation ductile fracture second-phase particles aluminum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Pilkey, A.K., Effect of Second Phase Particle Clustering on Aluminum-Silicon Alloy Sheet Formability. Ph.D. Thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Worswick, M.J., Chen, Z.T., Pilkey, A.K. and Lloyd, D., Damage characterization and damage percolation modeling in aluminum alloy sheet. Acta Materialia, 2001, 49: 2791–2803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Chen, Z.T., Worswick, M.J., Cinotti, N., Pilkey, A.K. and Lloyd, D., A linked FE-damage percolation model of aluminium alloy sheet forming. International Journal of Plasticity, 2003, 19: 2099–2120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Chen, Z.T., The Role of Heterogeneous Particle Distribution in the Prediction of Ductile Fracture. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, 2004.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Chen, Z.T., Worswick, M.J., Pilkey, A.K. and Lloyd, D.J., Multi-scale damage percolation simulation and experiment of aluminum alloy stretch flanging. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2005, 53: 2692–2717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Chen, Z.T. and Worswick, M.J., Investigation of void nucleation in Al-Mg sheet. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2008, 483–484: 99–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Butcher, C.J. and Chen, Z.T., Damage percolation modeling of void nucleation within heterogeneous particle distributions. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2009, 17: 075003 (16 pp).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Bandstra, J.P. and Koss, D.A., On the influence of void clusters on void growth and coalescence during ductile fracture. Acta Materialia, 2008, 56: 4429–4439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Gurson, A.L., Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth-Part I. Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 1977, 99: 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Tvergaard, V., Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane strain conditions. International Journal of Fracture, 1981, 17: 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Gologanu, M., Leblond, J.B., Perrin, G., Devaux, J., Recent extensions of Gurson’s model for porous ductile metals. In: Continuum Mechanics, P. Suquet, Ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997, 61–130.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Benzerga, A.A., Micromechanics of coalescence in ductile fracture. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2002, 50: 1332–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Benzerga, A.A., Besson, J. and Pineau, A., Anisotropic ductile fracture of A50S steel. Acta Materialia, 2004, 52: 4639–4650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Horstemeyer, M.F. and Gokhale, A.M., A void-crack nucleation model for ductile materials. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1999, 36: 5029–5055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Horstemeyer, M.F., Ramaswamy, S. and Negrete, M., Using a micromechanical finite element parametric study to motivate a phenomenological macroscale model for void/crack nucleation in aluminum with a hard second phase. Mechanics of Materials, 2003, 35: 675–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Lievers, W.B., Pilkey, A.K. and Lloyd, D.J., Using incremental forming to calibrate a void nucleation model for automotive aluminum sheet alloys. Acta Materialia, 2004, 52: 3001–3007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Butcher, C.J., Chen, Z.T. and Worswick, M.J., A lower bound damage-based finite element simulation of stretch flange forming of Al-Mg alloys. International Journal of Fracture, 2006, 142: 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Voce, E., Relationship between stress and strain for homogeneous deformation. Journal of the Institute of Metals, 1948, 74: 537–562.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Embury, J.D., Plastic flow in dispersion hardened materials. Metallurgical Transactions A, 1985, 16: 2191–2200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Dighe, M.D. and Gokhale, A.M. and Horstemeyer, M.F., Effect of temperature on silicon particles damage in A356 alloy. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2002, 38: 1–8.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Shabrov, M.N. and Needleman, A., An analysis of inclusion morphology effects on void nucleation. Modeling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2002, 10: 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Gangalee, A. and Gurland, J., On the fracture of silicon particles in aluminum-silicon alloys. Transactions of the Metallurgical Society of AIME, 1967, 269–272.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Mazinani, M. and Poole, W.J., The effect of martensite plasticity on the deformation behaviour of a low carbon dual phase steel. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2007, 38: 328–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Zhang, K.S., Bai, J.B. and Francois, D., Numerical analysis of the influence of the Lode parameter on the void growth. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2001, 38: 5847–5856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Xue, L., Constitutive modelling of void shearing effect in ductile fracture of porous materials. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2007, 75: 3343–3366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Wu, P.D., Jain, M., Savoie, J., MacEwen, S.R., Tugcu, P., and Neale, K.W., Evaluation of anisotropic yield functions for aluminum sheets. International Journal of Plasticity, 2003, 19: 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Chu, C.C. and Needleman, A., Void nucleation effects in biaxially stretched sheets. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 1980, 102: 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Stoughton, T.B., A general forming limit criterion for sheet metal forming. International Journal of Mechanical Science, 2000, 42: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Tang, C.Y., Fan, J.P. and Tsui, C.P., Prediction for forming limit of AL2024T3 sheet based on damage theory using finite element method. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 2006, 19: 174–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Bai, S.L., Ni, S.Y. and Fang, J., Experimental study of microhole growth and coalescence in ductile materials. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 1999, 12: 220–226.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics and Technology 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations