Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 180–188

# Study on parameters for topological variables field interpolated by moving least square approximation

Article

## Abstract

This paper presents a new approach to the structural topology optimization of continuum structures. Material-point independent variables are presented to illustrate the existence condition, or inexistence of the material points and their vicinity instead of elements or nodes in popular topology optimization methods. Topological variables field is constructed by moving least square approximation which is used as a shape function in the meshless method. Combined with finite element analyses, not only checkerboard patterns and mesh-dependence phenomena are overcome by this continuous and smooth topological variables field, but also the locations and numbers of topological variables can be arbitrary. Parameters including the number of quadrature points, scaling parameter, weight function and so on upon optimum topological configurations are discussed. Two classic topology optimization problems are solved successfully by the proposed method. The method is found robust and no numerical instabilities are found with proper parameters.

## Key words

topological optimization continuum structure meshless method moving least square approximation checkerboard pattern mesh-dependence

## References

1. [1]
Eschenauer, H.A., Kobelev, H.A. and Schumacher, A., A bubble for topology and shape optimization of structures. Structural Optimization, 1994, 8(2): 142–151.Google Scholar
2. [2]
Novotny, A.A., Feijoo, R.A., Taroco, E., et al., Topological sensitivity analysis for three-dimensional linear elasticity problem. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 196: 4354–4364.
3. [3]
Belytschko, T., Xiao, S.P., Parimi, C., Topology optimization with implicit functions and regularization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2003, 57: 1177–1196.
4. [4]
Bendsoe, M.P., Kikuchi, N., Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1998, 71: 197–224.
5. [5]
Rietz, A., Sufficiency of a finite exponent in SIMP (power law) methods. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001, 21(2): 159–163.
6. [6]
Sui, Y.K., Modelling, Transformation an Optimization: New Developments of Structural Synthesis Method. China: Dalian University of Technology Press, 1996.Google Scholar
7. [7]
Sui, Y.K., Ye, H.L., Du, J.Z., Development of structural topological optimization and imminency of its model transformation into independent level. Engineering Mechanics, 2005, 22 (sup): 107–118.Google Scholar
8. [8]
Sui, Y.K., Peng, X.R., The improvement for the ICM method of structural topology optimization. Acta Mechanica Sinica. 2005, 37(2): 190–198.Google Scholar
9. [9]
Xie, Y.M., Steven, G.P., Evolutionary Structural Optimization. Springer: London, 1997.
10. [10]
Zhou, M., Rozvany, G.I.N., On the validity of ESO type methods in topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001, 21(1): 80–83.
11. [11]
Sigmund, O., Petersson, J., Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: A survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards mesh-dependencies and local minima. Structural Optimization, 1998, 16(1): 68–75.
12. [12]
Yuan, Z., Wu, C.C., Topology optimization of continuum structures using incompatible finite elements. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2003, 35(2): 176–180.
13. [13]
Yuan, Z., Wu, C.C., Zhuang, S.B., Topology optimization of continuum structure using hybrid elements and artificial material model. Journal of China University of Science and Technology, 2001, 31(6): 694–699.Google Scholar
14. [14]
Sigmund, O., Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2007, 33(4–5): 401–424.
15. [15]
Poulsen, T.A., Topology optimization in wavelet space. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2002, 53(3): 567–582.
16. [16]
Rahmatalla, S.F., Swan, C.C., A Q4/Q4 continuum structural topology optimization implementation. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2004, 27(1): 130–135.
17. [17]
Belytschko, T., Xiao, S.P., Parimi, C., Topology optimization with implicit functions and regularization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2003, 57: 1177–1196.
18. [18]
Guo, X., Zhao, K., A new topology description function based approach for structural topology optimization. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2004, 36(5): 520–526.Google Scholar
19. [19]
Zhou, J.X., Zhou, W., Meshless approximation combined with implicit topology description for optimization of continuum. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2007, 36(4): 347–353.
20. [20]
Seonho Cho, Juho Kwak., Topology design optimization of geometrically non-linear structures using mesh-free method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 195: 5909–5925.
21. [21]
Luo, Z., Du, Y.X., Chen, L.P., et al. Continuum topology optimization for monolithic compliant mechanisms of micro-actuators. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 2006, 19(1): 58–68.
22. [22]
Du, Y.X., Chen, L.P., Luo, Z., Topology synthesis of Geometrically nonlinear compliant mechanisms using meshless method. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 2008, 21(1): 51–61.
23. [23]
Bendsoe, M.P., Sigmund, O., Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications. New York: Springer, 2003.
24. [24]
Sigmund, O., A 99 line topology optimization code written in Matlab. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001, 21(2): 120–127.