Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 171–179 | Cite as

Elasto-plastic constitutive model of soil-structure interface in consideration of strain softening and dilation

Article

Abstract

The behavior of soil-structure interface plays a major role in the definition of soil-structure interaction. In this paper a bi-potential surface elasto-plastic model for soil-structure interface is proposed in order to describe the interface deformation behavior, including strain softening and normal dilatancy. The model is formulated in the framework of generalized potential theory, in which the soil-structure interface problem is regard as a two-dimensional mathematical problem in stress field, and plastic state equations are used to replace the traditional field surface. The relation curves of shear stress and tangential strain are fitted by a piecewise function composed by hyperbolic functions and hyperbolic secant functions, while the relation curves of normal strain and tangential strain are fitted by another piecewise function composed by quadratic functions and hyperbolic secant functions. The approach proposed has the advantage of deriving an elastoplastic constitutive matrix without postulating the plastic potential functions and yield surface. Moreover, the mathematical principle is clear, and the entire model parameters can be identified by experimental tests. Finally, the predictions of the model have been compared with experimental results obtained from simple shear tests under normal stresses, and results show the model is reasonable and practical.

Key words

generalized potential theory strain softening shear dilatancy interface constitutive model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Clough, G.W. and Duncan, J.M., Finite element analysis of retaining wall behavior. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Division, ASCE, 1971, 97(12): 1657–1673.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Desai, C.S., Drumm, E.C. and Zaman, M.M., Cyclic testing and modeling of interface. Journal of Geotechnical engineering, ASCE, 1985, 111(6): 793–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Lu, T.H. and Bao, F.B., A coupled constitutive model for interface thin-layer element. Hydraulic Engineering, 2000, 2: 71–75.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Wang, W., Study on soil-structure interface model based on the potential energy dissipating principle and its application [Ph.D. dissertation]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2006.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Wang, W., Lu, T.H. and Sun, B.X., Mathematical model of shear stress-strain relationship of soil-concrete interface during shear fracture. Key Engineering Materials, 2007, (348–349): 881–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Desai, C.S. and Ma, Y., Modelling of joints and interfaces using the disturbed-state concept. Journal or Numerical and Analysis Methods in Geomechanics, 1992, (16): 623–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hu, L.M., The mechanical characteristics of soil and structure interface and its engineering application [Ph.D. dissertation]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Zhang, G., Monotonic and cyclic mechanical characteristics and damage theory of the interface between structure and coarse grained soil [Ph.D. dissertation]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2002.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Zhang, G. and Zhang, J.M., Load-induced damage of the interface between structure and coarse grained soil. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2004, 36(3): 322–327.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Zhang, G. and Zhang, J.M., Elastoplastic damage model of soil-structure interface in single pile-soil interaction analysis. Engineering Mechanics, 2006, 23(2): 72–77.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Boulon, M. and Nova, R., Modelling of soil-structure interface behavior: a comparison between elasto- plastic and rate type laws. Computers and Geotechnics, 1990, (9): 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Gennaro, V. and Frank, R., Elasto-plastic analysis of the interface behavior between granular media and structure. Computers and Geotechnics, 2002, 29: 547–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Ghionna, V.N. and Mortar, G., An elastoplastic model for sand-structure interface behavior. Geotechnique, 2002, 52(1): 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Liu, H.B., Song, E.X. and Ling, H.I., Constitutive modeling of soil-structure interface through the concept of critical state soil mechanics. Mechanics Research Communications, 2006, 33: 515–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Sun, J.Z. and Wang, Y., Constitutive model of calcareous sand structure interface. Chinese Quarterly of Mechanic, 2006, 27(3): 476–480.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Yin, Z.Z., Zhu, H. and Xu, G.H., Numerical simulation of the deformation in the interface between soil and structural material. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 16(3): 14–22.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Luan, M.T. and Wu, Y.J., A nonlinear elasto-perfectly plastic model of interface element for soil-structure interaction and its applications. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2004, 25(4): 507–513.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Yang, G.H., Building the generalized plastic potential theory in constitutive relation of soils. In: Proceedings of the 3th National Conference on the Numerical Analysis and Analytical Method for Rock and Soil Mechanics, Zhuhai, 1988: 140–148.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Yang, G.H., The Multi-potential constitutive theory of elasto-plasticity for the soil and rock materials. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1991, 13(5): 99–107.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Yang, G.H., A new strain space elasto-plastic constitutive model for soils. In: Proceedings of second international conference on soft soil engineering, Nanjing: Hohai University Press, 1996: 255–262.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Yang, G.H., Mathematical theory and application of the constitutive model of soils [Ph.D. dissertation]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 1998.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Yang, G.H., Jie, Y.X. and Li, G.X., Multi-potential surface model for soils and its verification. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1999, 21(5): 578–582.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Yang, G.H. and Li, G.X., Mathematical foundation of constitutive models of geotechnical material and generalized potential theory. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2002, 23(5): 531–535.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Yang, G.H. and Li, G.X., Constitutive theory of soils based on the generalized potential theory. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2007, 29(4): 594–597.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Shen, Z.J., A nonlinear dilatant stress-strain model for soils and rock materials. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 1986, 4: 1–14.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Wang, P.C., Zhu, X.R. and Fang, P.F., Expansion of large strain spherical cavity in soil in consideration of dilation and strain softening. Shuili Xuebao, 2004, 9: 78–82.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics and Technology 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering of Ministry of EducationNanjingChina
  2. 2.Geotechnical Research InstituteHohai UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations