Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of Deterministic, Reliability-Based Topology Optimization under Uncertainties

  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reliability and optimization are two key elements for structural design. The reliability-based topology optimization (RBTO) is a powerful and promising methodology for finding the optimum topologies with the uncertainties being explicitly considered, typically manifested by the use of reliability constraints. Generally, a direct integration of reliability concept and topology optimization may lead to computational difficulties. In view of this fact, three methodologies have been presented in this study, including the double-loop approach (the performance measure approach, PMA) and the decoupled approaches (the so-called Hybrid method and the sequential optimization and reliability assessment, SORA). For reliability analysis, the stochastic response surface method (SRSM) was applied, combining with the design of experiments generated by the sparse grid method, which has been proven as an effective and special discretization technique. The methodologies were investigated with three numerical examples considering the uncertainties including material properties and external loads. The optimal topologies obtained using the deterministic, RBTOs were compared with one another; and useful conclusions regarding validity, accuracy and efficiency were drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bendsøe, M.P. and Kikuchi, N., Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1988, 71(2): 197–224.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bendsøe, M.P. and Sigmund, O., Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg Company, 2003.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, C.Y., Pan, J. and Wang, D.Y., The satellite structure topology optimization based on homogenization method and its size sensitivity analysis. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 2005, 18(2): 173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, J.O., Yang, Y.S. and Ruy, W.S., A comparative study on reliability-index and target-performance-based probabilistic structural design optimization. Computers & Structures, 2002, 80(3–4): 257–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maute, K. and Frangopol, D.M., Reliability-based design of MEMS mechanisms by topology optimization. Computers & Structures, 2003, 81(8): 813824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, C., Wang, S.Y, Bae, K.R., Moon, H. and Choi, K.K., Reliability-based topology optimization with uncertainties. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2006, 20(4): 494–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho, K.H., Park, J.Y., Im, M.G. and Han, S.Y., Reliability-based topology optimization of electro-thermal-compliant mechanisms with a new material mixing method. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2012, 13(5): 693–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kharmanda, G., Olhoff, N., Mohamed, A. and Lemaire, M., Reliability-based topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2004, 26(5): 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Silva, M., Tortorelli, D.A., Norato, J.A., Ha, C. and Bae, H.R., Component and system reliability-based topology optimization using a single-loop method. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2010, 41(1): 87–106.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen, T.H., Song, J. and Paulino, G.H., Single-loop system reliability-based topology optimization considering statistical dependence between limit-states. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2011, 44(5): 593–611.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoo, K.S., Eom, Y.S., Park, J.Y., et al., Reliability-based topology optimization using successive standard response surface method. Finite Elem Anal Des, 2011, 47(8): 843–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eom, Y.S., Yoo, K.S., Park, J.Y. and Han, S.Y., Reliability-based topology optimization using a standard response surface method for three-dimensional structures. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2011, 43(2): 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki, K. and Kikuchi, N., A homogenization method for shape and topology optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1991, 93 (3): 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bendsøe, M.P., Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Computers & Structures, 1989, 1(4): 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xie, Y.M. and Steven, G.P., A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Computers & Structures, 1993, 49(5): 885–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, M.Y., Wang, X. and Guo, D., A level set method for structural topology optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2003, 192(1–2): 227–246.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Eschenauer, H.A. and Olhoff, N., Topology optimization of continuum structures: a review. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2001, 54(4): 331–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, S.H. and Chen, W., A comparative study of uncertainty propagation methods for black-box-type problems. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2009, 37(3): 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hasofer, A.M. and Lind, N.C., An exact and invariant first order reliability format. Journal of Engineering Mechanics—ASCE, 1974, 100(1): 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenblatt, M., Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1952, 23(3): 470–472.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, P.L. and Kiureghian, A.D., Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 1986, 1(2): 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tu, J. and Choi, K.K., A new study on reliability-based design optimization. Journal of Mechanical Design-ASME, 1999, 121(4): 557–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, Y.T., Millwater, H.R. and Cruse, T.A., Advanced probabilistic structural analysis method for implicit performance functions. AIAA Journal, 1990, 28(9): 1663–1669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grujicic, M., Arakere, G., Bell, W.C., Marvi, H., Yalavarthy, H.V., Pandurangan, B., Haque, I. and Fadel, G.M., Reliability-Based Design Optimization for Durability of Ground Vehicle Suspension System Components. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2010, 19(3): 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Du, X. and Chen, W., Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design. Journal of Mechanical Design-ASME, 2004, 126(2): 225–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Isukapalli, S.S., Roy, A. and Georgopoulos, P.G., Stochastic response surface methods (SRSMs) for uncertainty propagation: application to environmental and biological systems. Risk Analysis, 1998, 18(3): 351–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiong, F.F., Chen, W., Xiong, Y. and Yang, S., Weighted stochastic response surface method considering sample weights. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2011, 43(6): 837–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smolyak, S.A., Quadrature and interpolation formulas for tensor products of certain classes of functions. Doklady Akademii nauk SSSR, 1963, 1(4): 240–243.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Yserentant, H., On the multi-level splitting of finite element spaces. Numerische Mathematik, 1986, 49(4): 379–412.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Xiong, F.F., Greene, S., Chen, W., Xiong, Y. and Yang, S.X., A new sparse grid based method for uncertainty propagation. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2010, 41(3): 335–349.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Gerstner, T. and Griebel, M., Numerical integration using sparse grids. Numerical Algorithms, 1998, 18(3–4): 209–232.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Clenshaw, C.W. and Curtis, A.R., A method for numerical integration on an automatic computer. Numerische Mathematik, 1960, 2(1): 197–205.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Svanberg, K., The method of moving asymptotes-a new method for structural optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1987, 24(2): 359–373.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Sigmund, O., Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2007, 33(4–5): 401–424.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaokai Chen.

Additional information

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51275040 and 50905017), and the Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (No. B12022). The authors are also grateful to Krister Svanberg for providing his implementation of the MMA algorithm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Q., Chen, X., Ma, Z. et al. A Comparison of Deterministic, Reliability-Based Topology Optimization under Uncertainties. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 29, 31–45 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-9166(16)60005-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-9166(16)60005-8

Key Words

Navigation