Advertisement

Mammalian Biology

, Volume 92, Issue 1, pp 111–114 | Cite as

Genetic evidence of promiscuity in a mammal without apparent sexual dimorphism, the white-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari)

  • Dalila Alves Leite
  • Alexine Keuroghlian
  • Danilo Aqueu Rufo
  • Cristina Yumi Miyaki
  • Cibele BiondoEmail author
Short communication

Abstract

Polygyny in mammals, as in other groups, is related to sexual dimorphism, with males being larger than females or with elaborate weaponry as a response to sexual selection. However, sexual selection can also act on females, leading to cases where dimorphism is reversed or absent and females mate with several males, leading to a promiscuous mating system. In this study, we analyzed the mating system of a monomorphic mammalian species, the white-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari), using microsatellite molecular markers and parentage tests. The white-lipped peccary mating system is predicted to be polygyny, but so far, no systematic study exists. To verify their mating behavior, 131 individuals of a herd from the Brazilian Pantanal were genotyped for 11 microsatellite loci and parentage tests were performed for all the sampled young. We determined that both males and females had offspring with more than one partner which is compatible with a promiscuous mating system. Promiscuity in this species could be related to competition among females as a result of the female-biased sex ratio leading to sexual and/or natural selection not only on males but also females.

Keywords

Mating system Multiple paternity Parentage tests Sexual selection Tayassuidae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altrichter, M., Almeida, R., 2002. Exploitation of white-lipped peccaries Tayassu pecari (Artiodactyla: Tayassuidae) on the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Oryx 36, 126–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altrichter, M., Drews, C., Carrillo, E., Sáenz, J., 2001. Sex ratio and breeding of white-lipped peccaries Tayassu pecari (Artiodactyla: Tayassuidae) in a Costa Rican rain forest. Revista de Biología Tropical 49, 383–389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Altrichter, M., Drews, C., Sáenz, J.C., Carrilo, E., 2002. Presupuesto de tiempo del chancho cariblanco (Tayassu pecari) em un bosque humedo de Costa Rica. Biotropica 34, 136–143.Google Scholar
  4. Andersson, M., 1994. Sexual Selection, second ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, H., Keuroghlian, A., Reyna-Hurtado, R., Altrichter, M., Gongora, J.R., 2017. White-lipped Peccary Tayassu pecari link, 179. In: Melletti, M., Meijaard, E. (Eds.), Ecology, Conservation and Management of Wild Pigs and Peccaries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biondo, C., Keuroghlian, A., Gongora, J., Miyaki, C.Y., 2011. Population genetic structure and dispersal in white-lipped peccaries (Tayassu pecari) from the Brazilian Pantanal. J. Mammal. 92, 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birkhead, T.R., Møller, A.P., 1998. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Bodmer, R.E., 1990. Responses of ungulates to seasonal inundations in the Amazon floodplain. J. Trop. Ecol. 6, 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrillo, E., Sáenz, J.C., Fuller, T.K., 2002. Movements and activities of white-lipped peccaries in Corcovado National Park, Costa Rica. Biol. Conserv. 108, 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clutton-Brock, T.H., 2007. Sexual selection in males and females. Science 21, 1882–1885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clutton-Brock, T.H., Parker, G.A., 1995. Sexual coercion in animal societies. Anim. Behav. 49, 1345–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clutton-Brock, T.H., Harvey, P.H., Rudder, B., 1977. Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates. Nature 269, 797–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, J.D., Waser, P.M., Hellgren, E.C., Garbor, T.M., De Wood, J.A., 2011. Is sexual monomorphism a predictor of polygynandry? Evidence from asocial mammal, the collared peccary. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 775–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dalla Vecchia, A.C., Biondo, C., Sanches, A., Keuroghlian, A., Miyaki, C.Y., Galetti, M., GalettiJr., P.M., 2011. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci for white-lipped peccaries (Tayassu pecari) and cross-amplification in collared peccaries (Pecari tajacu). Conserv. Genet. Resour. 3, 151–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Darwin, C., 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. J. Murray, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Emlen, S.T., Oring, L.W., 1977. Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197, 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fragoso, J.M.V., 1994. Large Mammals and the Community of an Amazonian Rainforest. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  18. Fragoso, J.M.V., 1998. Home range and movement patterns of white lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari) herds in the northern Brazilian Amazon. Biotropica 30, 458–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gottdenker, N., Bodmer, R.E., 1998. Reproduction and productivity of white-lipped and collared peccaries in the Peruvian Amazon. J. Zool. Lond. 245, 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenwood, P.J., 1980. Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim. Behav. 28, 1140–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffith, S.C., Owens, I.P.F., Thuman, K.A., 2002. Extra-pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol. Ecol. 11, 2195–2212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jácomo, A.T.A., 2004. Ecologia, Manejo e Conservação do Queixada Tayassu pecari no Parque Nacional das Emas e em Propriedades Rurais de seu Entorno. Ph.D. dissertation. Universidade de Brasília, Goiás, Brazil.Google Scholar
  23. Keuroghlian, A., Desbiez, A.L.J., 2010. Biometric and age estimation of live peccaries in the Southern Pantanal, Brazil. Suiform Soundings 9, 24–35.Google Scholar
  24. Keuroghlian, A., Eaton, D.P., 2008a. Fruit availability and peccary frugivory in an isolated Atlantic forest fragment: effects on peccary ranging behavior and habitat use. Biotropica 40, 62–70.Google Scholar
  25. Keuroghlian, A., Eaton, D.P., 2008b. Importance of rare habitats and riparian zones in a tropical forest fragment: preferential use by Tayassu pecari, a wide-ranging frugivore. J. Zool. Lond. 275, 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keuroghlian, A., Eaton, D.P., 2009. Removal of palm fruits and ecosystem engineering in palm stands by white-lipped peccaries (Tayassu pecari) and other frugivores in an isolated Atlantic Forest fragment. Biodivers. Conserv. 18, 1733–1750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keuroghlian, A., Eaton, D.P., Longland, W.S., 2004. Area use by white-lipped and collared peccaries (Tayassu pecari and Tayassu tajacu) in a tropical forest fragment. Biol. Conserv. 120, 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Keuroghlian, A., Santos, M.C.A., Eaton, D.P., 2015. The effects of deforestation on white-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari) home range in the southern Pantanal. Mammalia 79 (4), 491–497,  https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2014-0094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kiltie, R.A., Terborgh, J., 1983. Observations on the behavior of rain forest peccaries in Peru: why do white lipped peccaries form herds? Z. Tierpsychol. 62, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mayor, P., Bodmer, R.E., Lopez-Bejar, M., 2009. Reproductive performance of the wild white-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari) female in the Peruvian Amazon. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 56, 631–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Painter, L.R.E., 1998. Gardeners of the Forest: Plant-Animal Interactions in a Neotropical Forest Ungulate Community. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  32. Rohrer, G.A., Alexander, L.J., Keele, J.W., Smith, T.P., Beattie, C.W., 1994. A microsatellite linkage map of the porcine genome. Genetics 136, 231–245.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Rohrer, G.A., Alexander, L.J., Hu, Z., Smith, T.P., Keele, J.W., Beattie, C.W., 1996. A comprehensive map of the porcine genome. Genome Res. 6, 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rufo, D.A., 2012. Parentescoe diferenciaçãogenéticaem queixadas (Tayassu pecari) do Pantanal Matogrossense (MS). M.S. Thesis. Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
  35. Schulte-Hostedde, A.I., Millar, J.S., Gibbs, H.L., 2004. Sexual selection and mating patterns in a mammal with female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Behav. Ecol. 15, 351–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sowls, L.K., 1997. Javelinas and Other Peccaries: Their Biology, Management, and Use, second ed. Texas A&M University Press, College Station.Google Scholar
  37. Storz, J.F., 1999. Genetic consequences of mammalian social structure. J. Mammal. 80, 553–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang, J., 2004. Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics 166, 1963–1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang, J., Santure, A.W., 2009. Parentage and sibship inference from multi-locus genotype data under polygamy. Genetics 181, 1579–1594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wolff, J.O., Macdonald, D.W., 2004. Promiscuous females protect their offspring. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dalila Alves Leite
    • 1
  • Alexine Keuroghlian
    • 2
  • Danilo Aqueu Rufo
    • 3
  • Cristina Yumi Miyaki
    • 3
  • Cibele Biondo
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas (CCNH), Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)Alameda da Universidade s/n°São PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Peccary Project, Rua Spipe CalargeMato Grosso do SulBrazil
  3. 3.Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de BiociênciasUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations